Accuracy of digital impressions for implant-supported complete-arch prosthesis when using an auxiliary geometry device

被引:9
|
作者
Arikan, Hale [1 ]
Muhtarogullari, Mehmet [1 ]
Uzel, Sema Merve [1 ]
Guncu, Mustafa Baris [1 ]
Aktas, Guliz [1 ]
Marshall, Lindsay Simone [2 ]
Turkyilmaz, Ilser [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Hacettepe Univ, Fac Dent, Dept Prosthodont, Ankara, Turkiye
[2] NYU, Coll Dent, Dept Prosthodont, New York, NY USA
[3] NYU, Coll Dent, New York, NY USA
[4] NYU, Coll Dent, Dept Prosthodont, 380 Second Ave,Suite 302, New York, NY 10010 USA
关键词
Digital dentistry; Digital impression; Fit; Framework; Implant; Intraoral scanner; MULTIPLE IMPLANTS; FIT; TECHNOLOGY; FRAMEWORKS; PROTOCOL; SCANNER; DESIGN;
D O I
10.1016/j.jds.2023.01.012
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Background/purpose: Digital impressions using intraoral scanners have recently gained popularity. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the fit of full-arch screw-retained cobalt-chromium frameworks fabricated via two different digital impression methods. Materials and methods: An edentulous resin master model with four dental implants was fabricated. Forty cobalt-chromium superstructures were fabricated and evaluated according to four groups. In Group 1, the superstructures were evaluated using an intraoral scanner to generate digital impressions. Group 2 relied on the help of an auxiliary geometric appliance in generation of digital impressions via intraoral scanner. The traditional method of splinted open-tray conventional impressions was designated for Group 3. Finally, the control group (Group 4) relied on scanning of the master model directly with a laboratory scanner. Vertical marginal discrepancy was evaluated, and data obtained were statistically analyzed. Results: The highest mean vertical marginal gap value (80.86 +/- 50.06 mu m) was observed for Group 1 and statistically higher than Group 2, 3, and 4 (P < 0.05). The lowest mean vertical marginal gap value (41.98 +/- 26.33 mu m) was measured from Group 4 and statistically similar to Group 2 and 3 (P > 0.05). Conclusion: It has been suggested that the use of auxiliary geometric appliances yields increased scanning accuracy. Frameworks fabricated using the traditional splinted open-tray technique were more reliable compared to those frameworks from digital impressions. (c) 2023 Association for Dental Sciences of the Republic of China. Publishing services by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页码:808 / 813
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Accuracy of digital impressions for implant-supported complete-arch prosthesis, using an auxiliary geometry part-An in vitro study
    Iturrate, Mikel
    Eguiraun, Harkaitz
    Solaberrieta, Eneko
    [J]. CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2019, 30 (12) : 1250 - 1258
  • [2] Effect of prefabricated auxiliary devices and scanning patterns on the accuracy of complete-arch implant digital impressions
    Wu, Hio Kuan
    Chen, Guanhui
    Wang, Jing
    Zhang, Zhengchuan
    Huang, Xiaoqiong
    Lin, Xiaoxuan
    Deng, Feilong
    Li, Yiming
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2024, 140
  • [3] Obtaining reliable intraoral digital scans for an implant-supported complete-arch prosthesis: A dental technique
    Iturrate, Mikel
    Minguez, Rikardo
    Pradies, Guillermo
    Solaberrieta, Eneko
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2019, 121 (02): : 237 - 241
  • [4] Accuracy of intraoral scan with prefabricated aids and stereophotogrammetry compared with open tray impressions for complete-arch implant-supported prosthesis: A clinical study
    Fu, Xiao-Jiao
    Liu, Min
    Liu, Bei-Lei
    Tonetti, Maurizio S.
    Shi, Jun-Yu
    Lai, Hong-Chang
    [J]. CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2024, 35 (08) : 830 - 840
  • [5] Accuracy of different digital scanning techniques and scan bodies for complete-arch implant-supported prostheses
    Mizumoto, Ryan M.
    Yilmaz, Burak
    McGlumphy, Edwin A., Jr.
    Seidt, Jeremy
    Johnston, William M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2020, 123 (01): : 96 - 104
  • [6] Conventional and digital impressions for complete-arch implant-supported fixed prostheses: time, implant quantity effect and patient satisfaction
    Pereira, Ana Larisse Carneiro
    Medeiros, Vitoria Ramos
    Campos, Maria de Fatima Trindade Pinto
    de Medeiros, Annie Karoline Bezerra
    Yilmaz, Burak
    Carreiro, Adriana da Fonte Porto
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ADVANCED PROSTHODONTICS, 2022, 14 (04): : 212 - 222
  • [7] Digital scanning for complete-arch implant-supported restorations: A systematic review
    Wulfman, Claudine
    Naveau, Adrien
    Rignon-Bret, Christophe
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2020, 124 (02): : 161 - 167
  • [8] Accuracy analysis of complete-arch digital scans in edentulous arches when using an auxiliary geometric device
    Iturrate, Mikel
    Eguiraun, Harkaitz
    Etxaniz, Olatz
    Solaberrieta, Eneko
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2019, 121 (03): : 447 - 454
  • [9] Knowledge structure and research hotspots on digital scanning for implant-supported complete-arch prosthesis: A bibliometric analysis
    Gao, Yutong
    Zhao, Mingyu
    Xia, Shici
    Sa, Yue
    [J]. HELIYON, 2024, 10 (17)
  • [10] An interim solution for a fractured complete-arch fixed implant-supported prosthesis using an Essix retainer
    Thomas, Tyler J.
    Bidra, Avinash S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2016, 116 (05): : 824 - 825