Accuracy of digital impressions for implant-supported complete-arch prosthesis when using an auxiliary geometry device

被引:9
|
作者
Arikan, Hale [1 ]
Muhtarogullari, Mehmet [1 ]
Uzel, Sema Merve [1 ]
Guncu, Mustafa Baris [1 ]
Aktas, Guliz [1 ]
Marshall, Lindsay Simone [2 ]
Turkyilmaz, Ilser [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Hacettepe Univ, Fac Dent, Dept Prosthodont, Ankara, Turkiye
[2] NYU, Coll Dent, Dept Prosthodont, New York, NY USA
[3] NYU, Coll Dent, New York, NY USA
[4] NYU, Coll Dent, Dept Prosthodont, 380 Second Ave,Suite 302, New York, NY 10010 USA
关键词
Digital dentistry; Digital impression; Fit; Framework; Implant; Intraoral scanner; MULTIPLE IMPLANTS; FIT; TECHNOLOGY; FRAMEWORKS; PROTOCOL; SCANNER; DESIGN;
D O I
10.1016/j.jds.2023.01.012
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Background/purpose: Digital impressions using intraoral scanners have recently gained popularity. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the fit of full-arch screw-retained cobalt-chromium frameworks fabricated via two different digital impression methods. Materials and methods: An edentulous resin master model with four dental implants was fabricated. Forty cobalt-chromium superstructures were fabricated and evaluated according to four groups. In Group 1, the superstructures were evaluated using an intraoral scanner to generate digital impressions. Group 2 relied on the help of an auxiliary geometric appliance in generation of digital impressions via intraoral scanner. The traditional method of splinted open-tray conventional impressions was designated for Group 3. Finally, the control group (Group 4) relied on scanning of the master model directly with a laboratory scanner. Vertical marginal discrepancy was evaluated, and data obtained were statistically analyzed. Results: The highest mean vertical marginal gap value (80.86 +/- 50.06 mu m) was observed for Group 1 and statistically higher than Group 2, 3, and 4 (P < 0.05). The lowest mean vertical marginal gap value (41.98 +/- 26.33 mu m) was measured from Group 4 and statistically similar to Group 2 and 3 (P > 0.05). Conclusion: It has been suggested that the use of auxiliary geometric appliances yields increased scanning accuracy. Frameworks fabricated using the traditional splinted open-tray technique were more reliable compared to those frameworks from digital impressions. (c) 2023 Association for Dental Sciences of the Republic of China. Publishing services by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页码:808 / 813
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] NUMBER OF IMPLANTS MAY NOT SIGNIFICANTLY AFFECT LONG-TERM CLINICAL OUTCOMES OF COMPLETE-ARCH IMPLANT-SUPPORTED PROSTHESIS
    Kim, Yongjeong
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EVIDENCE-BASED DENTAL PRACTICE, 2020, 20 (02)
  • [32] Dimensional accuracy of different techniques used for complete-arch multi-implant impressions
    Ghanem, Rabab A.
    Nassani, Mohammad Z.
    Baroudi, Kusai
    Fattah, Amany Abdel
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE AND CLINICAL DENTISTRY, 2016, 7 (03) : 225 - 231
  • [33] Alternative complete-arch cement-retained implant-supported fixed partial denture
    Hofstede, TM
    Ercoli, C
    Hagan, MF
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 1999, 82 (01): : 94 - 99
  • [34] Marginal discrepancy of CAD-CAM complete-arch fixed implant-supported frameworks
    Yilmaz, Burak
    Kale, Ediz
    Johnston, William M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2018, 120 (01): : 65 - 70
  • [35] Effect of framework material on the color of implant-supported complete-arch fixed dental prostheses
    Yilmaz, Burak
    Alp, Gulce
    Johnston, William M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2019, 122 (01): : 69 - 75
  • [36] Complete-arch implant-supported monolithic zirconia fixed dental prostheses: A systematic review
    Abdulmajeed, Aous A.
    Lim, Kevin G.
    Naerhi, Timo O.
    Cooper, Lyndon F.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2016, 115 (06): : 672 - 677
  • [37] Accuracy of different digital acquisition methods in complete arch implant-supported prostheses: An in vitro study
    Pinto, Ricardo J.
    Casado, Sara A.
    Chmielewski, Krzysztof
    Carames, Joao M.
    Marques, Duarte S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2024, 132 (01): : 172 - 177
  • [38] Prosthetically guided bone sculpturing for a maxillary complete-arch implant-supported monolithic zirconia fixed prosthesis based on a digital smile design: A clinical report
    Rojas-Vizcaya, Fernando
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2017, 118 (05): : 575 - 580
  • [39] Milled cobalt-chromium metal framework with veneered porcelain for a complete-arch fixed implant-supported prosthesis: A clinical report
    Srivastava, Akanksha
    Bidra, Avinash S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2020, 123 (03): : 367 - 372
  • [40] Pick-up Impression of Complete Arch Implant-Supported Interim Prosthesis
    Jamjoom, Faris Z.
    Lee, Damian J.
    Zheng, Fengyuan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORAL IMPLANTOLOGY, 2019, 45 (01) : 55 - 57