Accuracy analysis of complete-arch digital scans in edentulous arches when using an auxiliary geometric device

被引:71
|
作者
Iturrate, Mikel [1 ]
Eguiraun, Harkaitz [1 ,2 ]
Etxaniz, Olatz [1 ]
Solaberrieta, Eneko [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Basque Country UPV EHU, Engn Sch Bilbao, Dept Graph Design & Engn Projects, Bilbao, Spain
[2] Univ Basque Country UPV EHU, Plentzia Marine Stn, Res Ctr Expt Marine Biol & Biotechnol, Plentzia, Spain
[3] Univ Basque Country UPV EHU, Engn Sch Gipuzkoa, Dept Graph Design & Engn Projects, San Sebastian, Spain
来源
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY | 2019年 / 121卷 / 03期
关键词
CLINICAL-EVALUATION; MULTIPLE IMPLANTS; INTRAORAL SCANNER; IMPRESSIONS; PRECISION; FIT;
D O I
10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.09.017
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Statement of problem. Obtaining reliable digital scans of edentulous patients is challenging because of the absence of anatomic landmarks/geometric variations along the dental arch. Whether adding an auxiliary geometric device (AGD) will improve scanning is unclear. Purpose. The purpose of this in vitro study was to analyze the accuracy of complete-arch digital scans of completely edentulous arches by placing a consumable AGD. Material and methods. stainless-steel model of the maxilla of a completely edentulous arch with 4 implants was built. The model was scanned using a reference industrial scanner as the control and using 3 intraoral scanners (True Definition [3M ESPE], TRIOS 3 [3Shape A/S], and iTero [Align Technology, Inc]). Each intraoral scanner was used 10 times without the AGD in place and 10 more times with the AGD fixed on the model. Accuracy in terms of trueness and precision was established by comparing 5 reference distances with or without the AGD in place. A software program for analyzing 3D data was used to measure these 5 distances, and a data analysis software program was used for statistical and measurements analysis (alpha=.05). Results. Significant differences (P<.05) were found in all reference distances for trueness and in 4 of the 5 reference distances for precision depending on whether the AGD had been used or not. Without the AGD in place, trueness ranged from 21 +/- 16 mu m in the shortest reference distance to 125 +/- 80 mu m in the largest reference distance. With the AGD in place, trueness ranged from 11 +/- 8 in the shortest reference distance to 64 +/- 51 mu m in the largest reference distance. Precision ranged from 18 +/- 14 mu m in the shortest reference distance to 84 +/- 74 mu m in the largest reference distance without the AGD and from 7 +/- 7 mu m in the shortest to 63 +/- 46 mu m in the largest with it. Conclusion. Complete-arch digital scans of edentulous jaws are more accurate when an AGD is used to resolve the lack of anatomic landmarks. An additional advantage is that the use of the AGD allows for a more fluent scanning process.
引用
收藏
页码:447 / 454
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Accuracy of digital impressions for implant-supported complete-arch prosthesis when using an auxiliary geometry device
    Arikan, Hale
    Muhtarogullari, Mehmet
    Uzel, Sema Merve
    Guncu, Mustafa Baris
    Aktas, Guliz
    Marshall, Lindsay Simone
    Turkyilmaz, Ilser
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DENTAL SCIENCES, 2023, 18 (02) : 808 - 813
  • [2] Accuracy of digital complete-arch, multi-implant scans made in the edentulous jaw with gingival movement simulation: An in vitro study
    Knechtle, Nathalie
    Wiedemeier, Daniel
    Mehl, Albert
    Ender, Andreas
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2022, 128 (03): : 468 - 478
  • [3] Influence of scanning protocol on the accuracy of complete-arch digital implant scans: An in vitro study
    Hamilton, Adam
    Negreiros, William Matthew
    Jain, Shruti
    Finkelman, Matthew
    Gallucci, German O.
    [J]. CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2024, 35 (06) : 641 - 651
  • [4] Effect of artificial landmarks of the prefabricated auxiliary devices located at different arch positions on the accuracy of complete-arch edentulous digital implant scanning: An in-vitro study
    Wu, Hio Kuan
    Chen, Guanhui
    Zhang, Zhengchuan
    Lin, Xiaoxuan
    Huang, Xiaoqiong
    Deng, Feilong
    Li, Yiming
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2024, 140
  • [5] The effect of scanner type and scan body position on the accuracy of complete-arch digital implant scans
    Cakmak, Gulce
    Yilmaz, Hakan
    Trevino, Alejandro
    Kokat, Ali Murat
    Yilmaz, Burak
    [J]. CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2020, 22 (04) : 533 - 541
  • [6] Effect of prefabricated auxiliary devices and scanning patterns on the accuracy of complete-arch implant digital impressions
    Wu, Hio Kuan
    Chen, Guanhui
    Wang, Jing
    Zhang, Zhengchuan
    Huang, Xiaoqiong
    Lin, Xiaoxuan
    Deng, Feilong
    Li, Yiming
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2024, 140
  • [7] Effect of scan pattern on complete-arch scans with 4 digital scanners
    Latham, Jason
    Ludlow, Mark
    Mennito, Anthony
    Kelly, Abigail
    Evans, Zachary
    Renne, Walter
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2020, 123 (01): : 85 - 95
  • [8] Impact of color temperature and illuminance of ambient light conditions on the accuracy of complete-arch digital implant scans
    Ochoa-Lopez, Gaston
    Revilla-Leon, Marta
    Gomez-Polo, Miguel
    [J]. CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2024, 35 (08) : 898 - 905
  • [9] Comparison of the accuracy of intraoral scans between complete-arch scan and quadrant scan
    Youn-Gyeong Moon
    Kyung-Min Lee
    [J]. Progress in Orthodontics, 21
  • [10] Comparison of the accuracy of intraoral scans between complete-arch scan and quadrant scan
    Moon, Youn-Gyeong
    Lee, Kyung-Min
    [J]. PROGRESS IN ORTHODONTICS, 2020, 21 (01)