Life cycle assessment and life cycle costing of a building-scale, solar-driven water purification system *

被引:3
|
作者
Kolathur, Sharang [1 ,2 ]
Khatiwada, Dilip [1 ]
Khan, Ershad Ullah [2 ]
机构
[1] KTH Royal Inst Technol, Dept Energy Technol, Div Energy Syst, Brinellvagen 68, SE-10044 Stockholm, Sweden
[2] HVR Water Purificat AB, Vasagatan 7, S-11120 Stockholm, Sweden
来源
ENERGY NEXUS | 2023年 / 10卷
关键词
Life cycle assessment (LCA); Air gap membrane distillation (AGMD); Solar energy; Levelized cost of water (LCOW); Solar and grid-operated system; ENERGY SYSTEM; DEMAND;
D O I
10.1016/j.nexus.2023.100208
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Water purification systems require material resources and energy to build and operate, thus leading to environmental burdens. Mature water treatment technologies such as reverse osmosis and multi-effect distillation have been extensively studied for their environmental impacts. There is still a lack of such studies in one of the promising technologies, namely, air gap membrane distillation (AGMD). This study performs a cradle-to-grave life cycle assessment (LCA) and a life cycle costing of a solar-driven AGMD water purification system. This research also assesses the cost competitiveness of the system compared to local bottled water using a levelized cost of water (LCOW) approach. The study shows that the environmental impacts of the water purification systems (using a functional unit of 590 m 3 of drinking water produced over a time period of 15 years) are: 27,224 kg CO 2eq (climate change), 2,408 kg 1.4-DCB (human carcinogenic toxicity), 3,100 kg 1.4-DCB (marine ecotoxicity), and 2,286 kg 1.4-DCB (freshwater ecotoxicity). The solar PV sub-system and solar thermal sub-system have a much higher impact than the water purification sub-system. The LCOW calculations show that the system, with its current runtime of six hours using solar energy, has a levelized cost of 0.46 USD/L. Alternative scenarios, such as the use of grid electricity and end-of-life treatment of generated wastes, are also evaluated. A sensitivity analysis is performed on four parameters, i.e., component lifetime, maintenance frequency, discount rate, and AGMD module production cost. This study could be useful to local governments, investors, and potential customers interested in the water purification system's environmental footprint and cost competitiveness.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Life Cycle Costing for Exterior Materials on Building Facade
    Lee, Jae-Seob
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT, 2021, 147 (07)
  • [22] Life cycle costing in public building projects in Vietnam
    Nguyen T.-Q.
    Ngo V.-Y.
    [J]. Journal of Applied Science and Engineering, 2021, 24 (06): : 861 - 866
  • [23] Life cycle assessment of solar hot water system for multifamily house
    Zelazna, A.
    Pawlowski, A.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING IV, 2013, : 479 - 482
  • [24] Life Cycle Assessment as a tool for the selection of solar hot water system
    Zelazna, A.
    Golebiowska, J.
    [J]. IV INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF COMPUTATIONAL METHODS IN ENGINEERING SCIENCE (CMES'19), 2019, 710
  • [25] Environmental and economic assessment of gasification wastewater treatment by life cycle assessment and life cycle costing approach
    Innocenzi, Valentina
    Cantarini, Federica
    Zueva, Svetlana
    Amato, Alessia
    Morico, Barbara
    Beolchini, Francesca
    Prisciandaro, Marina
    Veglio, Francesco
    [J]. RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2021, 168
  • [26] Analysis of effects of an objective function on environmental and economic performance of a water network system using life cycle assessment and life cycle costing methods
    Lim, Seong-Rin
    Park, Donghee
    Park, Jong Moon
    [J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2008, 144 (03): : 368 - 378
  • [27] Comparison of development scenarios of a black water source-separation sanitation system using life cycle assessment and environmental life cycle costing
    Thibodeau, Charles
    Monette, Frederic
    Glaus, Mathias
    [J]. RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2014, 92 : 38 - 54
  • [28] Analysis of effects of an objective function on environmental and economic performance of a water network system using life cycle assessment and life cycle costing methods
    Lim, Seong-Rin
    Park, Donghee
    Park, Jong Moon
    [J]. CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL, 2008, 144 (03) : 368 - 378
  • [29] Life cycle assessment of solar-driven oxidation as a polishing step of secondary-treated urban effluents
    Ioannou-Ttofa, Lida
    Foteinis, Spyros
    Chatzisymeon, Efthalia
    Michael-Kordatou, Irene
    Fatta-Kassinos, Despo
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL TECHNOLOGY AND BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2017, 92 (06) : 1315 - 1327
  • [30] Integration of life cycle assessment and life cycle costing for the eco-design of rubber products
    Dong, Yahong
    Zhao, Yating
    Wang, Hong
    Liu, Peng
    He, Yan
    Lin, Guangyi
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2022, 12 (01)