Life cycle assessment and life cycle costing of a building-scale, solar-driven water purification system *

被引:3
|
作者
Kolathur, Sharang [1 ,2 ]
Khatiwada, Dilip [1 ]
Khan, Ershad Ullah [2 ]
机构
[1] KTH Royal Inst Technol, Dept Energy Technol, Div Energy Syst, Brinellvagen 68, SE-10044 Stockholm, Sweden
[2] HVR Water Purificat AB, Vasagatan 7, S-11120 Stockholm, Sweden
来源
ENERGY NEXUS | 2023年 / 10卷
关键词
Life cycle assessment (LCA); Air gap membrane distillation (AGMD); Solar energy; Levelized cost of water (LCOW); Solar and grid-operated system; ENERGY SYSTEM; DEMAND;
D O I
10.1016/j.nexus.2023.100208
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Water purification systems require material resources and energy to build and operate, thus leading to environmental burdens. Mature water treatment technologies such as reverse osmosis and multi-effect distillation have been extensively studied for their environmental impacts. There is still a lack of such studies in one of the promising technologies, namely, air gap membrane distillation (AGMD). This study performs a cradle-to-grave life cycle assessment (LCA) and a life cycle costing of a solar-driven AGMD water purification system. This research also assesses the cost competitiveness of the system compared to local bottled water using a levelized cost of water (LCOW) approach. The study shows that the environmental impacts of the water purification systems (using a functional unit of 590 m 3 of drinking water produced over a time period of 15 years) are: 27,224 kg CO 2eq (climate change), 2,408 kg 1.4-DCB (human carcinogenic toxicity), 3,100 kg 1.4-DCB (marine ecotoxicity), and 2,286 kg 1.4-DCB (freshwater ecotoxicity). The solar PV sub-system and solar thermal sub-system have a much higher impact than the water purification sub-system. The LCOW calculations show that the system, with its current runtime of six hours using solar energy, has a levelized cost of 0.46 USD/L. Alternative scenarios, such as the use of grid electricity and end-of-life treatment of generated wastes, are also evaluated. A sensitivity analysis is performed on four parameters, i.e., component lifetime, maintenance frequency, discount rate, and AGMD module production cost. This study could be useful to local governments, investors, and potential customers interested in the water purification system's environmental footprint and cost competitiveness.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Life cycle assessment and life cycle costing of multistorey building: Attributional and consequential perspectives
    Fauzi, Rizal Taufiq
    Lavoie, Patrick
    Tanguy, Audrey
    Amor, Ben
    [J]. BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, 2021, 197
  • [2] Life Cycle Assessment and Life Cycle Costing of a SOFC system for distributed power generation
    Strazza, Carlo
    Del Borghi, Adriana
    Costamagna, Paola
    Gallo, Michela
    Brignole, Emma
    Girdinio, Paola
    [J]. ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2015, 100 : 64 - 77
  • [3] BIM-based life cycle assessment and life cycle costing of an office building in Western Europe
    Santos, Ruben
    Costa, Antonio Aguiar
    Silvestre, Jose D.
    Vandenbergh, Thomas
    Pyl, Lincy
    [J]. BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, 2020, 169
  • [4] A case-based study on the use of life cycle assessment and life cycle costing in the building industry
    Collin, C.
    Olesen, G. G. H.
    Secher, Qvist A.
    [J]. SUSTAINABLE BUILT ENVIRONMENT D-A-CH CONFERENCE 2019 (SBE19 GRAZ), 2019, 323
  • [5] Life cycle assessment and life cycle costing approach for building decarbonization by design choices: A case study
    Umdu, Emin Selahattin
    Yildirim, Nurdan
    Guzel, Poyraz
    Alakavuk, Ebru
    Umdu, Duygu Cinar
    [J]. ENERGY STORAGE, 2024, 6 (03)
  • [6] Study on integrated method of life cycle assessment and life cycle costing
    State Key Laboratory of Digital Manufacturing Equipment and Technology, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China
    [J]. Zhongguo Jixie Gongcheng, 2007, 15 (1804-1809):
  • [7] Comparative life cycle assessment and life cycle costing of lodging in the Himalaya
    Bhochhibhoya, Silu
    Pizzol, Massimo
    Achten, Wouter M. J.
    Maskey, Ramesh Kumar
    Zanetti, Michela
    Cavalli, Raffaele
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2017, 22 (11): : 1851 - 1863
  • [8] Comparative life cycle assessment and life cycle costing of lodging in the Himalaya
    Silu Bhochhibhoya
    Massimo Pizzol
    Wouter M. J. Achten
    Ramesh Kumar Maskey
    Michela Zanetti
    Raffaele Cavalli
    [J]. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2017, 22 : 1851 - 1863
  • [9] Life cycle costing as a bottom line for the life cycle sustainability assessment ck in the solar energy sector: A review
    Ximenes Naves, Alex
    Barreneche, Camila
    Ines Fernandez, A.
    Cabeza, Luisa F.
    Haddad, Assed N.
    Boer, Dieter
    [J]. SOLAR ENERGY, 2019, 192 : 238 - 262
  • [10] Life cycle assessment and life cycle costing of bioethanol from sugarcane in Brazil
    Luo, Lin
    van der Voet, Ester
    Huppes, Gjalt
    [J]. RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2009, 13 (6-7): : 1613 - 1619