Quality Selection in Two-Sided Markets: A Constrained Price Discrimination Approach

被引:2
|
作者
Light, Bar [1 ]
Johari, Ramesh [2 ]
Weintraub, Gabriel [3 ]
机构
[1] Tel Aviv Univ, Sch Math Sci, Dept Stat & Operat Res, IL-6139001 Tel Aviv, Israel
[2] Stanford Univ, Dept Management Sci & Engn, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[3] Stanford Univ, Grad Sch Business, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
two-sided markets; online marketplaces; quality selection; price discrimination; information design; INFORMATION DESIGN; MONOPOLY; SYSTEMS;
D O I
10.1287/opre.2020.0754
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Online platforms collect rich information about participants and then share some of this information back with them to improve market outcomes. In this paper, we study the following information disclosure problem in two-sided markets: if a platform wants to maximize revenue, which sellers should the platform allow to participate, and how much of its available information about participating sellers' quality should the platform share with buyers? We study this information disclosure problem in the context of two distinct two-sided market models: one in which the platform chooses prices and the sellers choose quantities (similar to ride sharing), and one in which the sellers choose prices (similar to e-commerce). Our main results provide conditions under which simple information structures commonly observed in practice, such as banning certain sellers from the platform and not distinguishing between participating sellers, maximize the platform's revenue. The platform's information disclosure problem naturally transforms into a constrained price discrimination problem in which the constraints are determined by the equilibrium outcomes of the specific two-sided market model being studied. We analyze this constrained price discrimination problem to obtain our structural results.
引用
收藏
页数:31
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Tying and freebies in two-sided markets
    Amelio, Andrea
    Jullien, Bruno
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ORGANIZATION, 2012, 30 (05) : 436 - 446
  • [42] Diffusion of Innovation in Two-Sided Markets
    Hui, Ka Hung
    Subramanian, Vijay
    Guo, Dongning
    Berry, Randall
    [J]. 2012 50TH ANNUAL ALLERTON CONFERENCE ON COMMUNICATION, CONTROL, AND COMPUTING (ALLERTON), 2012, : 426 - 433
  • [43] Switching Costs in Two-Sided Markets
    Lam, Wing Man Wynne
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ECONOMICS, 2017, 65 (01): : 136 - 182
  • [44] Mixed duopoly in two-sided markets
    Kim, Jeong-Yoo
    [J]. MANCHESTER SCHOOL, 2024, 92 (03): : 281 - 295
  • [45] Interviewing in two-sided matching markets
    Lee, Robin S.
    Schwarz, Michael
    [J]. RAND JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2017, 48 (03): : 835 - 855
  • [46] Dynamics of two-sided internet markets
    Vogelsang M.
    [J]. International Economics and Economic Policy, 2010, 7 (1) : 129 - 145
  • [47] Profit Shifting in Two-Sided Markets
    Schindler, Dirk
    Schjelderup, Guttorm
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE ECONOMICS OF BUSINESS, 2010, 17 (03) : 373 - 383
  • [48] Two-sided Airport Markets Reprised
    Starkie, David
    [J]. JOURNAL OF TRANSPORT ECONOMICS AND POLICY, 2021, 55 : 1 - 15
  • [49] Symposium on two-sided markets - Introduction
    Rochet, Jean-Charles
    Tirole, Jean
    [J]. RAND JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2006, 37 (03): : 643 - 644
  • [50] Subgroup fairness in two-sided markets
    Zhou, Quan
    Marecek, Jakub
    Shorten, Robert
    Kumar, Ashwani
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2023, 18 (02):