Quality Selection in Two-Sided Markets: A Constrained Price Discrimination Approach

被引:2
|
作者
Light, Bar [1 ]
Johari, Ramesh [2 ]
Weintraub, Gabriel [3 ]
机构
[1] Tel Aviv Univ, Sch Math Sci, Dept Stat & Operat Res, IL-6139001 Tel Aviv, Israel
[2] Stanford Univ, Dept Management Sci & Engn, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[3] Stanford Univ, Grad Sch Business, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
two-sided markets; online marketplaces; quality selection; price discrimination; information design; INFORMATION DESIGN; MONOPOLY; SYSTEMS;
D O I
10.1287/opre.2020.0754
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Online platforms collect rich information about participants and then share some of this information back with them to improve market outcomes. In this paper, we study the following information disclosure problem in two-sided markets: if a platform wants to maximize revenue, which sellers should the platform allow to participate, and how much of its available information about participating sellers' quality should the platform share with buyers? We study this information disclosure problem in the context of two distinct two-sided market models: one in which the platform chooses prices and the sellers choose quantities (similar to ride sharing), and one in which the sellers choose prices (similar to e-commerce). Our main results provide conditions under which simple information structures commonly observed in practice, such as banning certain sellers from the platform and not distinguishing between participating sellers, maximize the platform's revenue. The platform's information disclosure problem naturally transforms into a constrained price discrimination problem in which the constraints are determined by the equilibrium outcomes of the specific two-sided market model being studied. We analyze this constrained price discrimination problem to obtain our structural results.
引用
收藏
页数:31
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Segmenting Two-Sided Markets
    Banerjee, Siddhartha
    Gollapudi, Sreenivas
    Kollias, Kostas
    Munaga, kamesh
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 26TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON WORLD WIDE WEB (WWW'17), 2017, : 63 - 72
  • [22] EXPERIMENTATION IN TWO-SIDED MARKETS
    Peitz, Martin
    Rady, Sven
    Trepper, Piers
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC ASSOCIATION, 2017, 15 (01) : 128 - 172
  • [23] Strategies for two-sided markets
    Eisenmann, Thomas
    Parker, Geoffrey
    Van Alstyne, Marshall W.
    [J]. HARVARD BUSINESS REVIEW, 2006, 84 (10) : 92 - +
  • [24] Price-Increasing Competition on Two-Sided Markets with Homogeneous Platforms
    Böhme E.
    Müller C.
    [J]. Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, 2013, 13 (4) : 453 - 479
  • [25] Price structure in two-sided markets: Evidence from the magazine industry
    Kaiser, U
    Wright, J
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ORGANIZATION, 2006, 24 (01) : 1 - 28
  • [26] A Leverage Theory of Tying in Two-Sided Markets with Nonnegative Price Constraints
    Choi, Jay Pil
    Jeon, Doh-Shin
    [J]. AMERICAN ECONOMIC JOURNAL-MICROECONOMICS, 2021, 13 (01) : 283 - 337
  • [27] Second-Degree Price Discrimination by a Two-Sided Monopoly Platform
    Jeon, Doh-Shin
    Kim, Byung-Cheol
    Menicucci, Domenico
    [J]. AMERICAN ECONOMIC JOURNAL-MICROECONOMICS, 2022, 14 (02) : 322 - 369
  • [28] Pricing models of two-sided markets incorporating service quality
    Xue, Zhaojie
    Cheng, Shuqing
    Yu, Mingzhu
    Zou, Liang
    [J]. KYBERNETES, 2019, 48 (08) : 1827 - 1850
  • [29] Two-sided approach
    Arianne Heinrichs
    [J]. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, 2006, 7 : 386 - 387
  • [30] Two-sided markets and electronic intermediaries
    Jullien, B
    [J]. CESIFO ECONOMIC STUDIES, 2005, 51 (2-3) : 233 - 260