Dosimetric characteristics of 6MV flattening filter free and flattened beams among beam-matched linacs: a three-institutional study

被引:1
|
作者
Ghemis, Diana M. [1 ,2 ]
Marcu, Loredana G. [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Virag, Vasile [2 ]
Virag, Adriana [2 ]
机构
[1] West Univ Timisoara, Fac Phys, Timisoara, Romania
[2] MedEuropa, Oradea 410191, Romania
[3] Univ Oradea, Fac Informat & Sci, Oradea 410087, Romania
[4] Univ South Australia, UniSA Allied Hlth & Human Performance, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia
关键词
Beam matched linacs; FFF beam; Dosimetry; Commissioning; UNFLATTENED PHOTON BEAMS; QUALITY-ASSURANCE; QUANTITATIVE-EVALUATION; FREE FFF; TRUEBEAM; PARAMETERS; PROTOCOL; SYSTEM; IMRT;
D O I
10.1186/s13014-023-02313-5
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
BackgroundBeam matching is a concept in radiotherapy applied to clinics where more than one linac is employed to harmonise beam characteristics across linacs for allowing patients interchange without replanning. In view of this, the current study analyzes and compares dosimetric characteristics of 6MV flattening filter free and flattened beams of three beam-matched linear accelerators (linacs) from three different clinics with the aim to evaluate the matching under tight criteria for gamma analysis.MethodsThree Elekta linacs from three different clinics were included. The linacs have the same collimator assembly, Elekta Agility. Beam data were collected during commissioning process using PTW dosimetry systems. Dose profiles and percentage depth doses (PDD) were analyzed using 1D gamma analysis (1 mm/1%) as well as the following parameters: depth of maximum dose, PDD10, flatness, unflattnes, symmetry, penumbra, output factors. Additionally, five stereotactic treatment plans were optimized in one clinic and calculated by all three planning systems (Monaco) for a dosimetric comparison.ResultsGamma analysis of dose profiles and PDDs showed clinically acceptable results of 96.3% passing rate for profiles and 100% passing rate for PDDs. All dosimetric parameters were in good agreement with the reference data. Furthermore, dosimetric comparisons between stereotactic treatment plans showed a maximum standard deviation of 0.48 Gy for the maximum dose to PTV, and a maximum standard deviation of 0.1 Gy for the dose to the organs at risk.ConclusionsAll three linacs showed a strong agreement between parameters and passed the gamma analysis using 1% DD/1mm DTA criteria. This study confirmed the matching between linacs, offering the possibility to interchange patients with no replanning.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 35 条
  • [31] Dosimetric Impact on the Flattening Filter and Addition of Gold Nanoparticles in Radiotherapy: A Monte Carlo Study on Depth Dose Using the 6 and 10 MV FFF Photon Beams
    Spina, Armando
    Chow, James C. L.
    MATERIALS, 2022, 15 (20)
  • [32] Dose evaluation of Grid Therapy using a 6 MV flattening filter-free (FFF) photon beam: A Monte Carlo study
    Martinez-Rovira, Immaculada
    Puxeu-Vaque, Josep
    Prezado, Yolanda
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2017, 44 (10) : 5378 - 5383
  • [33] Dosimetric accuracy of the Acuros XB and Anisotropic analytical algorithm near interface of the different density media for the small fields of a 6-MV flattening-filter-free beam
    Kang, S. W.
    Chung, J. B.
    Lee, J. W.
    Kim, M. J.
    Kim, Y. L.
    Kim, J. S.
    Eom, K. Y.
    Kim, I. A.
    Suh, T. S.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION RESEARCH, 2017, 15 (02): : 157 - 165
  • [34] Geometrical source modeling of 6MV flattening-filter-free (FFF) beam from TrueBeam linear accelerator and its commissioning validation using Monte Carlo simulation approach for radiotherapy
    Shende, Ravindra
    Dhoble, S. J.
    Gupta, Gourav
    RADIATION PHYSICS AND CHEMISTRY, 2022, 199
  • [35] Evaluation of dosimetric parameters of small fields of 6 MV flattening filter free photon beam measured using various detectors against Monte Carlo simulation (Mar, 10.1017/S1460396920000114, 2020)
    Mamballikalam, Gopinath
    Senthilkumar, S.
    Jayadevan, P. M.
    Jaon Bos, R. C.
    Basith, P. M. Ahamed
    Inippully, Rohit
    Shine, N. S.
    Clinto, C. O.
    JOURNAL OF RADIOTHERAPY IN PRACTICE, 2021, 20 (03) : 369 - 369