Dosimetric characteristics of 6MV flattening filter free and flattened beams among beam-matched linacs: a three-institutional study

被引:1
|
作者
Ghemis, Diana M. [1 ,2 ]
Marcu, Loredana G. [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Virag, Vasile [2 ]
Virag, Adriana [2 ]
机构
[1] West Univ Timisoara, Fac Phys, Timisoara, Romania
[2] MedEuropa, Oradea 410191, Romania
[3] Univ Oradea, Fac Informat & Sci, Oradea 410087, Romania
[4] Univ South Australia, UniSA Allied Hlth & Human Performance, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia
关键词
Beam matched linacs; FFF beam; Dosimetry; Commissioning; UNFLATTENED PHOTON BEAMS; QUALITY-ASSURANCE; QUANTITATIVE-EVALUATION; FREE FFF; TRUEBEAM; PARAMETERS; PROTOCOL; SYSTEM; IMRT;
D O I
10.1186/s13014-023-02313-5
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
BackgroundBeam matching is a concept in radiotherapy applied to clinics where more than one linac is employed to harmonise beam characteristics across linacs for allowing patients interchange without replanning. In view of this, the current study analyzes and compares dosimetric characteristics of 6MV flattening filter free and flattened beams of three beam-matched linear accelerators (linacs) from three different clinics with the aim to evaluate the matching under tight criteria for gamma analysis.MethodsThree Elekta linacs from three different clinics were included. The linacs have the same collimator assembly, Elekta Agility. Beam data were collected during commissioning process using PTW dosimetry systems. Dose profiles and percentage depth doses (PDD) were analyzed using 1D gamma analysis (1 mm/1%) as well as the following parameters: depth of maximum dose, PDD10, flatness, unflattnes, symmetry, penumbra, output factors. Additionally, five stereotactic treatment plans were optimized in one clinic and calculated by all three planning systems (Monaco) for a dosimetric comparison.ResultsGamma analysis of dose profiles and PDDs showed clinically acceptable results of 96.3% passing rate for profiles and 100% passing rate for PDDs. All dosimetric parameters were in good agreement with the reference data. Furthermore, dosimetric comparisons between stereotactic treatment plans showed a maximum standard deviation of 0.48 Gy for the maximum dose to PTV, and a maximum standard deviation of 0.1 Gy for the dose to the organs at risk.ConclusionsAll three linacs showed a strong agreement between parameters and passed the gamma analysis using 1% DD/1mm DTA criteria. This study confirmed the matching between linacs, offering the possibility to interchange patients with no replanning.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 35 条
  • [21] Dosimetric influence of Flattening Filter (FF) and Flattening Filter Free (FFF) 6 and 10 MV photon beams on Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) planning in case of prostate carcinoma
    Cakir, A.
    Akgun, Z.
    Saglam, E. Kaytan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION RESEARCH, 2019, 17 (02): : 253 - 263
  • [22] A comparative Monte Carlo study on 6MV photon beam characteristics of Varian 21EX and Elekta SL-25 linacs
    Mesbahi, A.
    Mehnati, P.
    Keshtkar, A.
    IRANIAN JOURNAL OF RADIATION RESEARCH, 2007, 5 (01): : 23 - 30
  • [23] Dosimetry and Implementation of High-Dose Rate MLC-Based GRID Therapy Using a 6MV Flattened Filter Free (FFF) Photon Beam
    Dou, K.
    Lerma, F.
    Jacobs, M.
    Li, B.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2013, 40 (06)
  • [24] Dosimetric Verification of Acuros XB Dose Calculation Algorithm On An Air Cavity for 6-MV Flattening Filter-Free Beam.
    Kang, S.
    Chung, J.
    Suh, T.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2015, 42 (06) : 3411 - 3411
  • [25] Monte Carlo study of a flattening filter-free 6 MV photon beam using the BEAMnrc code.
    Kajaria, Ankit
    Sharma, Neeraj
    Sharma, Shiru
    Pradhan, Satyajit
    Mandal, Abhijit
    Aggarwal M, Lalit
    BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH-INDIA, 2017, 28 (04): : 1566 - 1573
  • [26] Comparison of Flattening Filter (FF) and Flattening-Filter-Free (FFF) 6 MV photon beam characteristics for small field dosimetry using EGSnrc Monte Carlo code
    Sangeetha, S.
    Sureka, C. S.
    RADIATION PHYSICS AND CHEMISTRY, 2017, 135 : 63 - 75
  • [27] Daily Dosimetric Robustness of Prone-Position Whole Breast Radiotherapy (WBRT) Planned With Electronic Tissue Compensation (ECOMP) and 6MV Flattening Filter Free (6X-FFF) Beam Energy: Dose Variation and Predictive Factors
    Yoon, S. W.
    Freedman, G. M.
    Anamalayil, S. J.
    Dong, L.
    Hubley, E.
    Kennedy, C.
    Teo, K.
    Taunk, N. K.
    Metz, J. M.
    Zou, W.
    Li, T.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2020, 108 (03): : E265 - E265
  • [28] Evaluation of dosimetric parameters of small fields of 6 MV flattening filter free photon beam measured using various detectors against Monte Carlo simulation
    Mamballikalam, Gopinath
    Senthilkumar, S.
    Jayadevan, P. M.
    Jaon Bos, R. C.
    Ahamed Basith, P. M.
    Inippully, Rohit
    Shine, N. S.
    Clinto, C. O.
    JOURNAL OF RADIOTHERAPY IN PRACTICE, 2021, 20 (03) : 332 - 339
  • [29] Dosimetric accuracy of AAA and acuros XB dose calculations within an air cavity for small fields of a 6-MV flattening filter-free beam
    Kang, Sang-Won
    Suh, Tae-Suk
    Chung, Jin-Beom
    Eom, Kuen-Yong
    Kim, In-Ah
    Kim, Jae-Sung
    Lee, Jeong-Woo
    Park, Ji-Yeon
    JOURNAL OF THE KOREAN PHYSICAL SOCIETY, 2015, 67 (12) : 2138 - 2145
  • [30] Dosimetric accuracy of AAA and acuros XB dose calculations within an air cavity for small fields of a 6-MV flattening filter-free beam
    Sang-Won Kang
    Tae-Suk Suh
    Jin-Beom Chung
    Kuen-Yong Eom
    In-Ah Kim
    Jae-Sung Kim
    Jeong-Woo Lee
    Ji-Yeon Park
    Journal of the Korean Physical Society, 2015, 67 : 2138 - 2145