Dosimetric characteristics of 6MV flattening filter free and flattened beams among beam-matched linacs: a three-institutional study

被引:1
|
作者
Ghemis, Diana M. [1 ,2 ]
Marcu, Loredana G. [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Virag, Vasile [2 ]
Virag, Adriana [2 ]
机构
[1] West Univ Timisoara, Fac Phys, Timisoara, Romania
[2] MedEuropa, Oradea 410191, Romania
[3] Univ Oradea, Fac Informat & Sci, Oradea 410087, Romania
[4] Univ South Australia, UniSA Allied Hlth & Human Performance, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia
关键词
Beam matched linacs; FFF beam; Dosimetry; Commissioning; UNFLATTENED PHOTON BEAMS; QUALITY-ASSURANCE; QUANTITATIVE-EVALUATION; FREE FFF; TRUEBEAM; PARAMETERS; PROTOCOL; SYSTEM; IMRT;
D O I
10.1186/s13014-023-02313-5
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
BackgroundBeam matching is a concept in radiotherapy applied to clinics where more than one linac is employed to harmonise beam characteristics across linacs for allowing patients interchange without replanning. In view of this, the current study analyzes and compares dosimetric characteristics of 6MV flattening filter free and flattened beams of three beam-matched linear accelerators (linacs) from three different clinics with the aim to evaluate the matching under tight criteria for gamma analysis.MethodsThree Elekta linacs from three different clinics were included. The linacs have the same collimator assembly, Elekta Agility. Beam data were collected during commissioning process using PTW dosimetry systems. Dose profiles and percentage depth doses (PDD) were analyzed using 1D gamma analysis (1 mm/1%) as well as the following parameters: depth of maximum dose, PDD10, flatness, unflattnes, symmetry, penumbra, output factors. Additionally, five stereotactic treatment plans were optimized in one clinic and calculated by all three planning systems (Monaco) for a dosimetric comparison.ResultsGamma analysis of dose profiles and PDDs showed clinically acceptable results of 96.3% passing rate for profiles and 100% passing rate for PDDs. All dosimetric parameters were in good agreement with the reference data. Furthermore, dosimetric comparisons between stereotactic treatment plans showed a maximum standard deviation of 0.48 Gy for the maximum dose to PTV, and a maximum standard deviation of 0.1 Gy for the dose to the organs at risk.ConclusionsAll three linacs showed a strong agreement between parameters and passed the gamma analysis using 1% DD/1mm DTA criteria. This study confirmed the matching between linacs, offering the possibility to interchange patients with no replanning.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 35 条
  • [1] Dosimetric characteristics of 6MV flattening filter free and flattened beams among beam-matched linacs: a three-institutional study
    Diana M. Ghemiș
    Loredana G. Marcu
    Vasile Virag
    Adriana Virag
    Radiation Oncology, 18
  • [2] Dosimetric comparison between 6MV flattened filter and flattening filter free photon beams in the treatment of glioblastoma with IMRT technique: A treatment planning study
    Saroj D.K.
    Yadav S.
    Ghosh G.
    Shukla S.
    Gupta G.
    Choudhary S.
    Iranian Journal of Medical Physics, 2020, 17 (03) : 188 - 196
  • [3] Penumbral Width Calculation for Flattening Filter Free Beam 7MV and Flattened Beam 6MV Using Inflection Point
    Sinha, Sujit Nath
    Yadav, Girigesh
    Ashokkumar, S.
    Raman, Kothanda
    Thiyagarajan, Rajesh
    Mishra, Manindra
    Nambiraj, N. Arunai
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2012, 39 (06) : 3712 - 3712
  • [4] Dosimetric Differences of Plans Using Flattened 6MV Versus Flattening-Filter-Free 10MV Beams for the Treatment of Prostate with and Without Seminal Vesicles
    Ashenafi, M.
    Rothfuss, C.
    Gray, A.
    Zhang, H.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2021, 48 (06)
  • [5] Dosimetric Characteristics of Equivalent Quality Flattening Filter Free (FFF) and Flattened Photon Beams
    Meshram, M. N.
    Pramanik, S.
    Ranjith, C. P.
    Bhavsar, D.
    Jani, K. R.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2015, 93 (03): : E548 - E549
  • [6] Dosimetric comparison of normal breathing and deep inspiration breath hold technique for synchronous bilateral breast cancer using 6MV flattened beam and flattening filter free beam
    Tamilarasu, Suresh
    Saminathan, Madeswaran
    REPORTS OF PRACTICAL ONCOLOGY AND RADIOTHERAPY, 2022, 27 (01) : 63 - 75
  • [7] Beam characteristics of energy-matched flattening filter free beams
    Paynter, D.
    Weston, S. J.
    Cosgrove, V. P.
    Evans, J. A.
    Thwaites, D. I.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2014, 41 (05)
  • [8] Impact of 6 MV & 10 MV Flattened and Flattening Filter Free Beams in Whole Brain Radiotherapy: A Treatment Planning Study
    Suresh T.
    Madeswaran S.
    Iranian Journal of Medical Physics, 2021, 18 (03) : 218 - 225
  • [9] A Comparative Evaluation of 6MV Flatten Beam and Flattening Filter Free Photon Beam in Carcinoma Breast
    Tamilarasu, Suresh
    Saminathan, Madeswaran
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2016, 43 (06) : 3577 - 3578
  • [10] Direct Aperture Optimizations IMRT in ENT Tumors: Conventional 6MV Beam versus 6MV Flattening Filter-Free Beam in an ARTISTE Linear Accelerator
    Heyden, S.
    Kretschmer, M.
    Blechschmidt, A.
    Sabatino, M.
    Dahle, J.
    Feine, D.
    Giro, C.
    Wuerschmidt, F.
    STRAHLENTHERAPIE UND ONKOLOGIE, 2011, 187 : 34 - 34