Sustainability assessment of economic, environmental and social impacts, feed-food competition and economic robustness of dairy and beef farming systems in South Western Europe

被引:12
|
作者
Zira, Stanley [1 ]
Roos, Elin [2 ]
Rydhmer, Lotta [1 ]
Hoffmann, Ruben [3 ]
机构
[1] Swedish Univ Agr Sci, Dept Anim Breeding & Genet, SLU Box 7023, S-75007 Uppsala, Sweden
[2] Swedish Univ Agr Sci, Dept Energy & Technol, SLU Box 7032, S-75007 Uppsala, Sweden
[3] Swedish Univ Agr Sci, Dept Econ, SLU Box 7013, S-75007 Uppsala, Sweden
关键词
Life cycle sustainability assessment; Life cycle assessment; Semi -natural pasture; Cropland; Cattle; Robustness; CATTLE;
D O I
10.1016/j.spc.2023.01.022
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The objective of this study was to evaluate the sustainability of cattle systems in South Western Europe by com-bining life cycle sustainability assessment (LCSA) with assessment of feed-food competition and economic ro-bustness. We studied three cattle systems using different proportions of semi-natural pasture, and producing either only beef or milk and beef, i.e. a dairy system with Holstein breed in the lowlands of France with <5% of the total land used being semi-natural pastures (HolSy), a dairy system with Montbeliarde breed in the highlands of France with approximately 25% of the total land used being semi-natural pastures (MonSy), and a pure beef system with Parda de Montana breed in the highlands of Spain with >85% of the total land used being semi -natural pastures (ParSy). The functional unit for LCSA was 1000 kg protein of animal origin and the system boundary was from cradle to farmgate. The cattle production systems were assessed using 27 indicators (LCSA, feed-food competition and robustness). The results indicated that MonSy performed less well for 10 and ParSy for 14 out of the 27 indicators researched when compared to HolSy, the reference case. HolSy was less sensitive to a support payment decrease and had lower social impacts on farmers than the other two systems. MonSy had lower impacts on some environmental indicators, lower life cycle costs, lower social impacts on society, lower human edible feed conversion ratio (i.e. less feed-food competition) for fat and less sensitivity to a meat price de-crease than the other two systems. ParSy had lower terrestrial and freshwater ecotoxicity, lower human edible feed conversion ratio and land use ratio for protein, lower social impact for the local community, and a higher in-ternal rate of return than the other systems. ParSy had less sensitivity to feed and energy price increases, and in-creased rented land and loan interest costs than the other systems. Producing both meat and milk at the same farm increased vulnerability to economic changes. Semi-natural pasture based dairy in highland Europe needs support payments to keep the farm economically afloat in times of economic changes e.g. due to shocks.(c) 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of Institution of Chemical Engineers. This is an open ac-cess article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页码:439 / 448
页数:10
相关论文
共 28 条
  • [1] Research on Environmental, Economic, and Social Sustainability in Dairy Farming: A Systematic Mapping of Current Literature
    Segerkvist, Katarina Arvidsson
    Hansson, Helena
    Sonesson, Ulf
    Gunnarsson, Stefan
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 12 (14)
  • [2] Sustainability assessment for China's intensive dairy farming: Integrating environmental and economic perspectives
    Xu, Tianshu
    Zhang, Tianzuo
    Cheng, Ziyue
    Li, Ziheng
    Wang, Shuo
    Zhou, Xinying
    Li, Changting
    Wang, Liyao
    Li, Mengqing
    Hong, Jinglan
    [J]. SUSTAINABLE PRODUCTION AND CONSUMPTION, 2024, 50 : 216 - 226
  • [3] Irrigated farming systems: using the water footprint as an indicator of environmental, social and economic sustainability
    Altobelli, F.
    Cimino, O.
    Natali, F.
    Orlandini, S.
    Gitz, V
    Meybeck, A.
    Dalla Marta, A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCE, 2018, 156 (05): : 711 - 722
  • [4] Sustainability assessment of energy systems: integrating environmental, economic and social aspects
    Santoyo-Castelazo, Edgar
    Azapagic, Adisa
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2014, 80 : 119 - 138
  • [5] Regional sustainability in Northern Australia-A quantitative assessment of social, economic and environmental impacts
    Wood, Richard
    Garnett, Stephen
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2010, 69 (09) : 1877 - 1882
  • [6] Temperate pasture- or concentrate-beef production systems: steer performance, meat nutritional value, land-use, food-feed competition, economic and environmental sustainability
    Doyle, Peter
    O'Riordan, Edward G.
    McGee, Mark
    Crosson, Paul
    Kelly, Alan K.
    Moloney, Aidan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCE, 2023, 161 (05): : 704 - 719
  • [7] Deriving Socio-Economic Indicators for Sustainability Assessment of Sweet Cherry Farming Systems in South Patagonia
    Mundet, C. A.
    Baltuska, N.
    Cordoba, D.
    Sanz, C.
    Cittadini, E. D.
    [J]. VI INTERNATIONAL CHERRY SYMPOSIUM, 2014, 1020 : 523 - 528
  • [8] Assessment tool to compare the environmental, economic and social sustainability of strawberry production systems in Quebec
    Gendron, M.
    Gravel, V.
    Carisse, O.
    [J]. VIII INTERNATIONAL STRAWBERRY SYMPOSIUM, 2017, 1156 : 587 - 592
  • [9] Sustainability assessment of surplus food donation: A transfer system generating environmental, economic, and social values
    Sundin, Niina
    Bartek, Louise
    Osowski, Christine Persson
    Strid, Ingrid
    Eriksson, Mattias
    [J]. SUSTAINABLE PRODUCTION AND CONSUMPTION, 2023, 38 : 41 - 54
  • [10] Environmental and Economic Impacts of Localizing Food Systems: The Case of Dairy Supply Chains in the Northeastern United States
    Nicholson, Charles F.
    He, Xi
    Gomez, Miguel I.
    Gao, H. O.
    Hill, Elaine
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2015, 49 (20) : 12005 - 12014