Sustainability assessment for China's intensive dairy farming: Integrating environmental and economic perspectives

被引:0
|
作者
Xu, Tianshu [1 ]
Zhang, Tianzuo [1 ]
Cheng, Ziyue [1 ]
Li, Ziheng [1 ]
Wang, Shuo [1 ]
Zhou, Xinying [1 ]
Li, Changting [1 ]
Wang, Liyao [1 ]
Li, Mengqing [1 ]
Hong, Jinglan [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Shandong Univ, Sch Environm Sci & Engn, Shandong Key Lab Environm Proc & Hlth, Qingdao 266237, Peoples R China
[2] Shandong Univ, Climate Change & Hlth Ctr, Publ Hlth Sch, Jinan 250012, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Environmental-economic sustainability; Life cycle assessment; Life cycle costing; Intensive dairy farming; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; PRODUCTION SYSTEMS; HEAT-STRESS; INTENSIFICATION; IMPACTS; NITROGEN; CATTLE;
D O I
10.1016/j.spc.2024.08.004
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Intensive dairy farming (IDF) is crucial for achieving the second Sustainable Development Goal due to its superior milk production efficiency. However, IDF heavily relies on external inputs to increase productivity; this practice simultaneously increases environmental pollution, thereby posing significant challenges to its sustain- ability. This study conducted a comparative analysis of the environmental and economic sustainability of general-IDF, moderate-IDF, high-IDF, and traditional dairy farming (TDF) in China using a comprehensive method that integrates cradle-to-gate life cycle assessment and life cycle costing. Results showed that among the three IDF scenarios, high-IDF had the lowest external costs, and general-IDF had the lowest internal and total costs. Compared with TDF, IDF demonstrated poorer comprehensive environmental and economic performance, attributed to an increase in roughage expenditure ranging from 28.47 % to 116.73 %. In addition, the output value per ton of milk from IDF was $95.61 to $116.12 less than the total costs, implying the unsustainability of IDF from an integrated environmental and economic perspective. The global warming was the largest environmental impact category for dairy farming, contributing approximately 55 % to the total external costs. Feed dominated the environmental and economic burden with the proportion of approximately 50 % and 60 %, respectively. Key measures to achieve sustainability of IDF were to optimize feed production and consumption, with recommendations for improving feed efficiency and using cow manure as fertilizer. Adjusting the structure and layout of IDF in accordance with the social environment can also enhance the productivity and environmental and economic sustainability of IDF in China.
引用
收藏
页码:216 / 226
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Sustainability assessment of greenhouse vegetable farming practices from environmental, economic, and socio-institutional perspectives in China
    Lanqin Yang
    Biao Huang
    Mingcui Mao
    Lipeng Yao
    Silvana Niedermann
    Wenyou Hu
    Yong Chen
    [J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2016, 23 : 17287 - 17297
  • [2] Sustainability assessment of greenhouse vegetable farming practices from environmental, economic, and socio-institutional perspectives in China
    Yang, Lanqin
    Huang, Biao
    Mao, Mingcui
    Yao, Lipeng
    Niedermann, Silvana
    Hu, Wenyou
    Chen, Yong
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2016, 23 (17) : 17287 - 17297
  • [3] Research on Environmental, Economic, and Social Sustainability in Dairy Farming: A Systematic Mapping of Current Literature
    Segerkvist, Katarina Arvidsson
    Hansson, Helena
    Sonesson, Ulf
    Gunnarsson, Stefan
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 12 (14)
  • [4] Sustainable assessment and resource recycling opportunities identification for China's pig industry: Integrating environmental, economic and social perspectives
    Bai, Yueyang
    Zhai, Yijie
    Zhang, Tianzuo
    Ren, Ke
    Jia, Yuke
    Zhou, Xinying
    Cheng, Ziyue
    Tanikawa, Hiroki
    Hong, Jinglan
    [J]. SUSTAINABLE PRODUCTION AND CONSUMPTION, 2023, 39 : 425 - 437
  • [5] Evaluating sustainability of intensive farming systems in China
    Qu, F
    Zhang, R
    Wu, J
    [J]. ECONOMICS OF AGRO-CHEMICALS: AN INTERNATIONAL OVERVIEW OF USE PATTERNS, TECHNICAL AND INSTITUTIONAL DETERMINANTS, POLICIES AND PERSPECTIVES, 1998, : 145 - 153
  • [6] Integrating process modelling and sustainability assessment to improve the environmental and economic sustainability in the cheese industry
    Gosalvitr, Piya
    Cuellar-Franca, Rosa M.
    Smith, Robin
    Azapagic, Adisa
    [J]. SUSTAINABLE PRODUCTION AND CONSUMPTION, 2021, 28 : 969 - 986
  • [7] Sustainability assessment of energy systems: integrating environmental, economic and social aspects
    Santoyo-Castelazo, Edgar
    Azapagic, Adisa
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2014, 80 : 119 - 138
  • [8] Assessment of organic shrimp farming sustainability from economic and environmental viewpoints in Bangladesh
    Dhar, Aurup Ratan
    Uddin, Md Taj
    Roy, Mrinal Kanti
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH, 2020, 180
  • [9] Integrating sustainability and environmental impact assessment
    Lawrence, DP
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 1997, 21 (01) : 23 - 42
  • [10] Sustainability assessment of economic, environmental and social impacts, feed-food competition and economic robustness of dairy and beef farming systems in South Western Europe
    Zira, Stanley
    Roos, Elin
    Rydhmer, Lotta
    Hoffmann, Ruben
    [J]. SUSTAINABLE PRODUCTION AND CONSUMPTION, 2023, 36 : 439 - 448