Quality indicators and outcomes in ambulatory surgery

被引:1
|
作者
Glowka, Lena [1 ]
Tanella, Anthony [1 ]
Hyman, Jaime B. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Yale Sch Med, Dept Anesthesiol, New Haven, CT USA
[2] 333 Cedar St,TMP 3, New Haven, CT 06510 USA
关键词
ambulatory surgery; operating room efficiency; patient safety; patient-reported outcomes; regulatory monitoring; POSTOPERATIVE QUALITY; RECOVERY SCORE; MORBIDITY;
D O I
10.1097/ACO.0000000000001304
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Purpose of review: Quality indicators are used to monitor the quality and safety of care in ambulatory surgery, a specialty in which major morbidity and mortality remain low. As the demand for safe and cost-effective ambulatory surgical care continues to increase, quality indicators and metrics are becoming critical tools used to provide optimal care for these patients. Recent findings: Quality indicators are tools used by both regulatory agencies and surgical centers to improve safety and quality of ambulatory surgical and anesthetic care. These metrics are also being used to develop value-based payment models that focus on efficient, safe, and effective patient care. Patient reported outcome measures are a growing method of collecting data on the satisfaction and postoperative recovery period for ambulatory surgical patients. Monitoring of perioperative efficiency and utilization using quality metrics are important to the financial health of ambulatory surgical centers. Summary: Quality indicators will continue to play a growing role in the monitoring of quality and safety in ambulatory surgery, especially with the trend towards value-based reimbursement models and efficient, cost-effective surgical care. Additionally, quality indicators are useful tools to monitor postoperative patient outcomes and recovery pathways and the efficiency of operating room utilization and scheduling.
引用
收藏
页码:624 / 629
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Quality Indicators for Head and Neck Oncologic Surgery: Academic versus Nonacademic Outcomes
    Puram, Sidharth V.
    Bhattacharyya, Neil
    [J]. OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 2016, 155 (05) : 733 - 739
  • [12] Quality indicators in carotid surgery
    Tsantilas, Pavlos
    Knappich, Christoph
    Trenner, Matthias
    Kallmayer, Michael
    Kuehnl, Andreas
    Storck, Martin
    Eckstein, Hans-Henning
    [J]. GEFASSCHIRURGIE, 2020, 25 (07): : 550 - 559
  • [13] Strategy, Structure, and Patient Quality Outcomes in Ambulatory Surgery Centers (1997-2004)
    Chukmaitov, Askar
    Devers, Kelly J.
    Harless, David W.
    Menachemi, Nir
    Brooks, Robert G.
    [J]. MEDICAL CARE RESEARCH AND REVIEW, 2011, 68 (02) : 202 - 225
  • [14] Ambulatory surgery: safety, quality.
    Jouffroy, L
    [J]. ANNALES DE CHIRURGIE, 2001, 126 (07): : 686 - 691
  • [15] Quality Improvement for the Ambulatory Surgery Center
    Petersen, Bret T.
    [J]. CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2014, 12 (06) : 911 - 918
  • [16] HOW TO ASSESS QUALITY IN AMBULATORY SURGERY
    TWERSKY, RS
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ANESTHESIA, 1992, 4 (05) : S24 - S32
  • [17] Measuring Quality in Ambulatory Orthopedic Surgery
    Vaswani, Ravi
    Hutzler, Lorraine
    Bosco, Joseph
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL QUALITY, 2016, 31 (02) : 187 - 189
  • [18] AMBULATORY SURGERY OFFERS QUALITY, SAVINGS
    BARRON, E
    KNOBLE, JK
    [J]. HOSPITALS, 1980, 54 (03): : 74 - 76
  • [19] Patient-reported outcomes for ambulatory surgery
    Warnakulasuriya, Samantha R.
    Patel, Reshma C.
    Singleton, Georgina F.
    Moonesinghe, S. Ramani
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2020, 33 (06) : 768 - 773
  • [20] SINAS: Effective Impact in the Quality Improvement of Ambulatory Surgery at an Ambulatory Centre
    Alves, Eurico Castro
    Correia, Teresa
    Brandao, Pedro
    Teixeira, Laetitia
    Povo, Ana
    [J]. ACTA MEDICA PORTUGUESA, 2020, 33 (09): : 546 - 551