SINAS: Effective Impact in the Quality Improvement of Ambulatory Surgery at an Ambulatory Centre

被引:1
|
作者
Alves, Eurico Castro [1 ,2 ]
Correia, Teresa [1 ,2 ]
Brandao, Pedro [1 ,2 ]
Teixeira, Laetitia [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Povo, Ana [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Hosp Univ Porto, Dept Cirurgia, Porto, Portugal
[2] Univ Porto, Inst Ciencias Biomed Abel Salazar, Dept Cirurgia, Porto, Portugal
[3] Univ Porto, Ctr Invest Tecnol & Serv Saude, Porto, Portugal
[4] Univ Porto, Inst Saude Publ, Dept Saude Publ, Porto, Portugal
来源
ACTA MEDICA PORTUGUESA | 2020年 / 33卷 / 09期
关键词
Ambulatory Surgical Procedures; Benchmarking; Portugal; Quality of Health Care; Quality Improvement; INDICATORS; CARE;
D O I
10.20344/amp.12580
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: The National Health Assessment System is a system designed by the Portuguese Health Regulatory Entity in order to evaluate the overall quality of the health care institutions. One of the key areas evaluated by the National Health Assessment System is ambulatory surgery. The aim of this study is to demonstrate that the introduction of the National Health Assessment System evaluation at our ambulatory centre not only improved the overall quality of ambulatory surgery but also the quality of the clinical record entries. Material and Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed from the hospital's clinical database. The study was carried out at the ambulatory centre of the Hospital and University Centre of Porto, and included 100 consecutive surgical procedures, across all surgical specialties, previously selected by the National Health Assessment System audit performed in 2015 in our ambulatory surgery centre and other 46 surgical procedures performed in 2008 at our hospital, before the National Health Assessment System was implemented. The main outcome measure was the validation and record of the seven indicators of National Health Assessment System for ambulatory surgery. Results: We have seen an improvement in all indicators after the National Health Assessment System implementation, except for criterion 4. Discussion: Our study demonstrates that the introduction of the National Health Assessment System in our ambulatory centre resulted in the improvement in the quality of both of clinical practice, and clinical record keeping Conclusion: We can conclude that the application of evaluation of quality indicators and benchmarking practices can be used to enhance healthcare outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:546 / 551
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Quality Improvement for the Ambulatory Surgery Center
    Petersen, Bret T.
    CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2014, 12 (06) : 911 - 918
  • [2] Improvement in analgesia for ambulatory surgery
    Fletcher, D
    ANNALES FRANCAISES D ANESTHESIE ET DE REANIMATION, 2003, 22 (08): : 689 - 690
  • [3] Emergencies in freestanding ambulatory surgery centre
    Karlsson, Elin
    Jakobsson, Jan G.
    CURRENT OPINION IN ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2021, 34 (06) : 690 - 694
  • [4] Quality assurance for ambulatory surgery
    Hansis, ML
    CHIRURG, 2004, 75 (02): : 120 - 124
  • [5] Ambulatory surgery: safety, quality
    Jouffroy, L
    BULLETIN DE L ACADEMIE NATIONALE DE MEDECINE, 2001, 185 (06): : 1045 - 1055
  • [6] IMPROVEMENT OF THE AMBULATORY SURGICAL AID BY THE EXPERIENCE OF WORK OF THE CENTER OF AMBULATORY SURGERY
    POLOZHENTSEV, SD
    MALKIN, DM
    MARUSHKIN, AV
    LISITSYN, AS
    VINNIK, LF
    GONCHAROV, VP
    SHANIN, SS
    VESTNIK KHIRURGII IMENI I I GREKOVA, 1990, 144 (06): : 92 - 95
  • [7] Analyzing Quality Assessment and Performance Improvement Programs in Ambulatory Surgery Centers
    Smith, Irene
    AORN JOURNAL, 2016, 104 (04) : 285 - 285
  • [8] Quality improvement in the ambulatory surgical setting
    New, SW
    Gutierrez, L
    NURSING CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 1997, 32 (02) : 477 - &
  • [9] Quality indicators and outcomes in ambulatory surgery
    Glowka, Lena
    Tanella, Anthony
    Hyman, Jaime B.
    CURRENT OPINION IN ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2023, 36 (06) : 624 - 629
  • [10] Ambulatory surgery: safety, quality.
    Jouffroy, L
    ANNALES DE CHIRURGIE, 2001, 126 (07): : 686 - 691