Quality indicators and outcomes in ambulatory surgery

被引:1
|
作者
Glowka, Lena [1 ]
Tanella, Anthony [1 ]
Hyman, Jaime B. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Yale Sch Med, Dept Anesthesiol, New Haven, CT USA
[2] 333 Cedar St,TMP 3, New Haven, CT 06510 USA
关键词
ambulatory surgery; operating room efficiency; patient safety; patient-reported outcomes; regulatory monitoring; POSTOPERATIVE QUALITY; RECOVERY SCORE; MORBIDITY;
D O I
10.1097/ACO.0000000000001304
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Purpose of review: Quality indicators are used to monitor the quality and safety of care in ambulatory surgery, a specialty in which major morbidity and mortality remain low. As the demand for safe and cost-effective ambulatory surgical care continues to increase, quality indicators and metrics are becoming critical tools used to provide optimal care for these patients. Recent findings: Quality indicators are tools used by both regulatory agencies and surgical centers to improve safety and quality of ambulatory surgical and anesthetic care. These metrics are also being used to develop value-based payment models that focus on efficient, safe, and effective patient care. Patient reported outcome measures are a growing method of collecting data on the satisfaction and postoperative recovery period for ambulatory surgical patients. Monitoring of perioperative efficiency and utilization using quality metrics are important to the financial health of ambulatory surgical centers. Summary: Quality indicators will continue to play a growing role in the monitoring of quality and safety in ambulatory surgery, especially with the trend towards value-based reimbursement models and efficient, cost-effective surgical care. Additionally, quality indicators are useful tools to monitor postoperative patient outcomes and recovery pathways and the efficiency of operating room utilization and scheduling.
引用
收藏
页码:624 / 629
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Quality Indicators in Ambulatory Care Surgery: A Scoping Review
    Pinto, Joana
    Matias, Ana Cristina
    Sa, Luis
    Amaral, Antonio
    [J]. NURSING ECONOMICS, 2022, 40 (05): : 215 - 229
  • [2] Quality and Safety Outcomes of Ambulatory Plastic Surgery Facilities in California
    Parina, Ralitza
    Chang, David
    Saad, Ahmad N.
    Coe, Taylor
    Gosman, Amanda A.
    [J]. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2015, 135 (03) : 791 - 797
  • [3] Quality Indicators in Ambulatory Surgery: A Literature Review Comparing Portuguese and International Systems
    Nunes, Joao Silva
    Gomes, Rebeca
    Povo, Ana
    Alves, Eurico Castro
    [J]. ACTA MEDICA PORTUGUESA, 2018, 31 (7-8): : 425 - 430
  • [4] What indicators should be utilized in assesing the quality of care in Major Ambulatory Surgery?
    Reyes Perez, Abraham
    Cruz Rodriguez, Javier
    [J]. MEDISUR-REVISTA DE CIENCIAS MEDICAS DE CIENFUEGOS, 2016, 14 (06): : 661 - 663
  • [5] INDICATORS OF EXCESSIVE PAIN IN AMBULATORY SURGERY
    RITCHIE, ED
    CHUNG, F
    SU, J
    CLAXTON, A
    THANAMAYOORAN, S
    [J]. ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1995, 83 (3A) : A46 - A46
  • [6] Measuring Outcomes in Ambulatory Surgery
    Francone, Todd
    Ricciardi, Rocco
    [J]. SEMINARS IN COLON AND RECTAL SURGERY, 2011, 22 (04) : 217 - 221
  • [7] Comparative analysis of efficiency indicators in ambulatory surgery
    Rodriguez Ortega, Maria
    Porrero Carro, Jose Luis
    Aranaz Andres, Jesus Maria
    Castillo Fe, Maria Jose
    Alonso Garcia, Maria Teresa
    Sanchez-Cabezudo Diaz-Guerra, Carlos
    [J]. GACETA SANITARIA, 2018, 32 (05) : 473 - 476
  • [8] Quality assurance for ambulatory surgery
    Hansis, ML
    [J]. CHIRURG, 2004, 75 (02): : 120 - 124
  • [9] Ambulatory surgery: safety, quality
    Jouffroy, L
    [J]. BULLETIN DE L ACADEMIE NATIONALE DE MEDECINE, 2001, 185 (06): : 1045 - 1055
  • [10] Assessing outcomes following surgery for colorectal cancer using quality of care indicators
    Vergara-Fernandez, Omar
    Swallow, Carol J.
    Victor, J. Charles
    O'Connor, Brenda I.
    Gryphe, Robert
    MacRae, Helen M.
    Zohen, Zane
    McLeod, Robin S.
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2010, 53 (04) : 232 - 240