Influences of microjet pressure and number of microjets on the control of shock wave/boundary layer interaction

被引:5
|
作者
Xu, Hao [1 ]
Huang, Wei [1 ]
Du, Zhao-bo [1 ]
Meng, Yu-shan [1 ]
Liu, Chao-yang [1 ]
Yan, Li [2 ]
机构
[1] Natl Univ Def Technol, Coll Aerosp Sci & Engineenng, Sci & Technol Scramjet Lab, Changsha 410073, Hunan, Peoples R China
[2] Acad Mil Sci, Inst Syst Engineenng, Beijing 100101, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金; 国家重点研发计划;
关键词
Shock wave; boundary layer interaction (SWBLI); Microjet; Pressure ratio; Number of holes; CVP; Separation bubble; JET VORTEX GENERATORS; RAMP;
D O I
10.1016/j.ast.2023.108345
中图分类号
V [航空、航天];
学科分类号
08 ; 0825 ;
摘要
Boundary layer separation is a common phenomenon in supersonic/hypersonic vehicles, and can adversely affect the lift coefficient. Currently, active flow control based on microjets is used to inhibit the separation of the turbulent boundary layer. The obtained results predicted by the three-dimensional Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) equations and two-equation shear stress transport (SST) k-omega both with Realizable k-epsilon turbulence models show that the control mechanism of the microjets method is the counter-rotating vortex pair (CVP) generated by the microjet mixes the low-energy flow within the boundary layer with the high-energy flow near the boundary layer. The size of the vortex core in this CVP is the key to controlling SWBLI. The vortex nucleus that is larger and closer to the wall enables better SWBLI control. A lower or higher ratio of microjet pressure to inflow static pressure increases the total volume of the separation bubble and produces a negative gain. When the ratio of the triangular microjet hole bottom edge length to the spacing between the holes is too small, leading to a deterioration in the control effect. The addition of microjets reduces the total pressure recovery coefficient.(c) 2023 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:25
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Control of shock wave/boundary layer interaction induced by the microjet configuration
    Xu, Hao
    Huang, Wei
    Yan, Li
    Du, Zhao-bo
    ACTA ASTRONAUTICA, 2022, 201 : 111 - 128
  • [2] Optimization design of dual microjets for the shock wave/boundary layer interaction control in the supersonic flow
    Xu, Hao
    Huang, Wei
    Meng, Yu-shan
    Tian, Shan-shan
    Yan, Li
    AIP ADVANCES, 2023, 13 (04)
  • [3] Direct numerical simulation of shock wave/boundary layer interaction controlled by steady microjet in a compression ramp
    Xiao, Ruoye
    Sun, Dong
    Yu, Jian
    CHINESE JOURNAL OF AERONAUTICS, 2024, 37 (10) : 83 - 102
  • [4] Direct numerical simulation of shock wave/boundary layer interaction controlled by steady microjet in a compression ramp
    Ruoye XIAO
    Dong SUN
    Jian YU
    Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2024, 37 (10) : 83 - 102
  • [5] Shock wave - boundary layer interaction control by wall ventilation
    Doeffer, PP
    Bohning, R
    AEROSPACE SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2003, 7 (03) : 171 - 179
  • [6] Shock wave boundary layer interaction
    Abdellah Hadjadj
    Jean-Paul Dussauge
    Shock Waves, 2009, 19 : 449 - 452
  • [7] Flow physics involved in shock wave/boundary layer interaction control
    Délery, JM
    IUTAM SYMPOSIUM ON MECHANICS OF PASSIVE AND ACTIVE FLOW CONTROL, 1999, 53 : 15 - 22
  • [8] SHOCK WAVE/TURBULENT BOUNDARY LAYER INTERACTION AND ITS CONTROL.
    Delery, Jean M.
    Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 1985, 22 (04) : 209 - 280
  • [9] Progress of Shock Wave/Boundary Layer Interaction and Its Control in Inlet
    Zhang Y.
    Tan H.-J.
    Wang Z.-Y.
    Li X.
    Guo Y.-J.
    Tuijin Jishu/Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2020, 41 (02): : 241 - 259
  • [10] Adaptive control techniques in the shock wave/turbulence boundary layer interaction
    Huang W.
    Wu H.
    Zhong X.
    Du Z.
    Liu J.
    Guofang Keji Daxue Xuebao/Journal of National University of Defense Technology, 2024, 46 (02): : 49 - 61