Silvopastoral management for lowering trade-offs between beef production and carbon storage in tropical dry woodlands

被引:0
|
作者
Fernandez, Pedro David [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Gasparri, Nestor Ignacio [3 ]
Rojas, Tobias Nicolas [3 ]
Banegas, Natalia Romina [1 ]
Nasca, Jose Andres [1 ]
Jobbagy, Esteban Gabriel [4 ]
Kuemmerle, Tobias [2 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Inst Invest Anim Chaco Semiarido, Inst Nacl Tecnol Agr, Chanar Pozo S-N, RA-4113 San Miguel De Tucuman, Argentina
[2] Humboldt Univ, Geog Dept, Unter Linden 6, D-10099 Berlin, Germany
[3] Univ Nacl Tucuman, CONICET, Inst Ecol Reg, Casilla Correo 34, RA-4107 Yerba Buena, Tucuman, Argentina
[4] Univ Nacl San Luis, Grp Estudios Ambientales IMASL, CONICET, Ejercito Andes 950,D5700HHW, San Luis, Argentina
[5] Integrat Res Inst Transformat Human Environm Syst, Unter Linden 6, D-10099 Berlin, Germany
关键词
Agriculture/environment trade -off; Beef production; Cattle ranching; Ecosystem services; Ecosystem management; Woody cover; SEMIARID CHACO FOREST; SANTIAGO DEL ESTERO; LIVESTOCK PRODUCTION; SHRUB ENCROACHMENT; GRAZING SYSTEMS; FORAGE QUALITY; GRAN CHACO; TREE; VEGETATION; ARGENTINA;
D O I
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.168973
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Tropical dry woodlands and savannas harbour high levels of biodiversity and carbon, but are also important regions for agricultural production. This generates trade-offs between agriculture and the environment, as agricultural expansion and intensification typically involve the removal of natural woody vegetation. Cattle ranching is an expanding land use in many of these regions, but how different forms of ranching mediate the production/environment trade-off remains weakly understood. Here, we focus on the Argentine Chaco, to evaluate trade-offs between beef production and carbon storage in grazing systems with different levels of woody cover (n = 27). We measured beef productivity and carbon storage during 2018/19 and used a regression framework to quantify the trade-off between both, and to analyze which agroclimatic and management variables explain the observed trade-off. Our main finding was that silvopastures had the lowest trade-off between beef production and carbon storage, as management in these systems seeks to increase herbaceous forage by removing shrubs, while maintaining most of the bigger trees that contain most above-ground carbon. The most important variable explaining the beef production/carbon storage trade-off was pasture management, specifically the number of shrub encroachment control interventions, with a lower trade-off for higher numbers of interventions. Unfortunately, more interventions can also result in woody cover degradation over time, and shrub encroachment management must therefore be improved to become sustainable. Overall, our study highlights the strong environmental trade-offs associated with beef production in dry woodlands and savanna, but also the key role of good management practices in lowering this trade-off. Specifically, silvopastoral systems can increase beef production as much as converting woodlands to tree-less pastures, but silvopastures retain much more carbon in aboveground vegetation. Silvopastoral systems thus represent a promising land-use option to lower production/ environment trade-offs in the Dry Chaco and likely many other tropical dry woodlands and savannas.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Trade-offs between development, culture and conservation - Willingness to pay for tropical river management among urban Australians
    Zander, Kerstin K.
    Garnett, Stephen T.
    Straton, Anna
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2010, 91 (12) : 2519 - 2528
  • [42] Trade-offs between ecosystem services: Water and carbon in a biodiversity hotspot
    Chisholm, Ryan A.
    ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2010, 69 (10) : 1973 - 1987
  • [43] Scenarios of global bioenergy production: The trade-offs between agricultural expansion, intensification and trade
    Lotze-Campen, Hermann
    Popp, Alexander
    Beringer, Tim
    Mueller, Christoph
    Bondeau, Alberte
    Rost, Stefanie
    Lucht, Wolfgang
    ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 2010, 221 (18) : 2188 - 2196
  • [44] How does soil organic carbon mediate trade-offs between ecosystem services and agricultural production?
    Horacio Villarino, Sebastian
    Alberto Studdert, Guillermo
    Laterra, Pedro
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2019, 103 : 280 - 288
  • [45] Trade-offs between conservation and development in community based management initiatives
    Mar Delgado-Serrano, Maria
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE COMMONS, 2017, 11 (02): : 969 - 991
  • [46] Fisheries management scenarios: trade-offs between economic and biological objectives
    Maravelias, C. D.
    Pantazi, M.
    Maynou, F.
    FISHERIES MANAGEMENT AND ECOLOGY, 2014, 21 (03) : 186 - 195
  • [47] Trade-offs between storage and survival affect diapause timing in capital breeders
    Varpe, Oystein
    Ejsmond, Maciej J.
    EVOLUTIONARY ECOLOGY, 2018, 32 (06) : 623 - 641
  • [48] Unconditionally Secure Broadcast Encryption Schemes with Trade-Offs between Communication and Storage
    Watanabe, Yohei
    Shikata, Junji
    IEICE TRANSACTIONS ON FUNDAMENTALS OF ELECTRONICS COMMUNICATIONS AND COMPUTER SCIENCES, 2016, E99A (06): : 1097 - 1106
  • [49] Trade-Offs between Economic Gains and Carbon Stocks across a Range of Management Alternatives in Boreal Forests
    Ma, Zilong
    Chen, Si
    Shahi, Chander
    Chen, Han Y. H.
    Chen, Hao
    FORESTS, 2022, 13 (11):
  • [50] Trade-offs between storage and survival affect diapause timing in capital breeders
    Øystein Varpe
    Maciej J. Ejsmond
    Evolutionary Ecology, 2018, 32 : 623 - 641