Silvopastoral management for lowering trade-offs between beef production and carbon storage in tropical dry woodlands

被引:0
|
作者
Fernandez, Pedro David [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Gasparri, Nestor Ignacio [3 ]
Rojas, Tobias Nicolas [3 ]
Banegas, Natalia Romina [1 ]
Nasca, Jose Andres [1 ]
Jobbagy, Esteban Gabriel [4 ]
Kuemmerle, Tobias [2 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Inst Invest Anim Chaco Semiarido, Inst Nacl Tecnol Agr, Chanar Pozo S-N, RA-4113 San Miguel De Tucuman, Argentina
[2] Humboldt Univ, Geog Dept, Unter Linden 6, D-10099 Berlin, Germany
[3] Univ Nacl Tucuman, CONICET, Inst Ecol Reg, Casilla Correo 34, RA-4107 Yerba Buena, Tucuman, Argentina
[4] Univ Nacl San Luis, Grp Estudios Ambientales IMASL, CONICET, Ejercito Andes 950,D5700HHW, San Luis, Argentina
[5] Integrat Res Inst Transformat Human Environm Syst, Unter Linden 6, D-10099 Berlin, Germany
关键词
Agriculture/environment trade -off; Beef production; Cattle ranching; Ecosystem services; Ecosystem management; Woody cover; SEMIARID CHACO FOREST; SANTIAGO DEL ESTERO; LIVESTOCK PRODUCTION; SHRUB ENCROACHMENT; GRAZING SYSTEMS; FORAGE QUALITY; GRAN CHACO; TREE; VEGETATION; ARGENTINA;
D O I
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.168973
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Tropical dry woodlands and savannas harbour high levels of biodiversity and carbon, but are also important regions for agricultural production. This generates trade-offs between agriculture and the environment, as agricultural expansion and intensification typically involve the removal of natural woody vegetation. Cattle ranching is an expanding land use in many of these regions, but how different forms of ranching mediate the production/environment trade-off remains weakly understood. Here, we focus on the Argentine Chaco, to evaluate trade-offs between beef production and carbon storage in grazing systems with different levels of woody cover (n = 27). We measured beef productivity and carbon storage during 2018/19 and used a regression framework to quantify the trade-off between both, and to analyze which agroclimatic and management variables explain the observed trade-off. Our main finding was that silvopastures had the lowest trade-off between beef production and carbon storage, as management in these systems seeks to increase herbaceous forage by removing shrubs, while maintaining most of the bigger trees that contain most above-ground carbon. The most important variable explaining the beef production/carbon storage trade-off was pasture management, specifically the number of shrub encroachment control interventions, with a lower trade-off for higher numbers of interventions. Unfortunately, more interventions can also result in woody cover degradation over time, and shrub encroachment management must therefore be improved to become sustainable. Overall, our study highlights the strong environmental trade-offs associated with beef production in dry woodlands and savanna, but also the key role of good management practices in lowering this trade-off. Specifically, silvopastoral systems can increase beef production as much as converting woodlands to tree-less pastures, but silvopastures retain much more carbon in aboveground vegetation. Silvopastoral systems thus represent a promising land-use option to lower production/ environment trade-offs in the Dry Chaco and likely many other tropical dry woodlands and savannas.
引用
下载
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Trade-offs between carbon stocks and timber recovery in tropical forests are mediated by logging intensity
    Roopsind, Anand
    Caughlin, T. Trevor
    van der Hout, Peter
    Arets, Eric
    Putz, Francis E.
    GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY, 2018, 24 (07) : 2862 - 2874
  • [22] Simulating grassland utilization in beef suckler systems to investigate the trade-offs between production and floristic diversity
    Jouven, M.
    Baumont, R.
    AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS, 2008, 96 (1-3) : 260 - 272
  • [23] Trade-offs between economic development and biodiversity conservation on a tropical island
    Pagani-Nunez, Emilio
    Xu, Yang
    Yan, Mingxiao
    He, Jiekun
    Jiang, Zifei
    Jiang, Haisheng
    CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2022, 36 (05)
  • [24] Global economic trade-offs between wild nature and tropical agriculture
    Carrasco, Luis R.
    Webb, Edward L.
    Symes, William S.
    Koh, Lian P.
    Sodhi, Navjot S.
    PLOS BIOLOGY, 2017, 15 (07)
  • [25] Co-benefits and trade-offs between biodiversity, carbon storage and water flow regulation
    Onaindia, Miren
    Fernandez de Manuel, Beatriz
    Madariaga, Iosu
    Rodriguez-Loinaz, Gloria
    FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT, 2013, 289 : 1 - 9
  • [26] Promising Trade-Offs Between Energy Storage and Load Bearing in Carbon Nanofibers as Structural Energy Storage Devices
    Chen, Yjun
    Amiri, Ahmad
    Boyd, James C.
    Naraghi, Mohammad
    ADVANCED FUNCTIONAL MATERIALS, 2019, 29 (33)
  • [27] Synergies and Trade-Offs between Biodiversity and Carbon in Ecological Compensation
    Yirdaw, Eshetu
    Kanninen, Markku
    Monge, Adrian
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 15 (15)
  • [28] On the trade-offs and synergies between forest carbon sequestration and substitution
    Soimakallio, Sampo
    Kalliokoski, Tuomo
    Lehtonen, Aleksi
    Salminen, Olli
    MITIGATION AND ADAPTATION STRATEGIES FOR GLOBAL CHANGE, 2021, 26 (01)
  • [29] On the trade-offs and synergies between forest carbon sequestration and substitution
    Sampo Soimakallio
    Tuomo Kalliokoski
    Aleksi Lehtonen
    Olli Salminen
    Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 2021, 26
  • [30] Trade-offs between indicators of performance and sustainability in breeding suckler beef herds
    Ahmadi, B. Vosough
    Nath, M.
    Hyslop, J. J.
    Morgan, C. A.
    Stott, A. W.
    JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCE, 2017, 155 (01): : 156 - 170