Offshore tax evasion and wealth inequality: Evidence from a tax amnesty in the Netherlands

被引:7
|
作者
Leenders, Wouter [1 ]
Lejour, Arjan [2 ]
Rabate, Simon [3 ,4 ]
van 't Riet, Maarten [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
[2] Tilburg Univ, CPB Netherlands Bur Econ Policy Anal, Tilburg, Netherlands
[3] CPB Netherlands Bur Econ Policy Anal, Tilburg, Netherlands
[4] Ined French Inst Demog Studies, Paris, France
[5] Leiden Univ, CPB Netherlands Bur Econ Policy Anal, Leiden, Netherlands
关键词
Inequality; Wealth; Tax evasion; Netherlands; TOP INCOMES; SWEDEN; HAVENS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jpubeco.2022.104785
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Exploiting unique datasets covering over 29,000 tax evaders in the Netherlands, we investigate the dis-tribution of tax evasion and its implications for the measurement of wealth inequality. Tax evasion is concentrated at the top of the wealth distribution with over 10% of the wealthiest 0.01% of households - the "super rich" - evading taxes. At the top, households evade around 8% of their true tax liability. The "merely rich" (P90-P99.9) own 67% of hidden wealth, while the "super rich" account for only 7%. Consequently, the correction for offshore wealth has a modest effect on top wealth shares. We describe a number of explanations for the distribution of tax evasion by Dutch households: low-cost tax evasion opportunities in neighbouring countries for the "merely rich", sophisticated forms of tax evasion for, low effective tax rates on and migration to low tax jurisdictions by the "super rich". Taken together, these explanations suggest that the distribution of tax evasion strongly depends on a country's geographical and institutional settings.(c) 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Optimal taxes on wealth and consumption in the presence of tax evasion
    Johann K. Brunner
    Paul Eckerstorfer
    Susanne Pech
    Journal of Economics, 2013, 110 : 107 - 124
  • [32] Import tax evasion and avoidance: Evidence from Iran
    Yousefi, Kowsar
    Vesal, Mohammad
    Pilvar, Hanifa
    QUARTERLY REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND FINANCE, 2020, 75 : 31 - 39
  • [33] External audit and tax evasion: evidence from India
    Shehata, Nermeen
    Nathan, Siva
    Farooq, Omar
    Dahawy, Khaled
    APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2023, 55 (34) : 4023 - 4036
  • [34] The tax evasion social multiplier: Evidence from Italy
    Galbiati, Roberto
    Zanella, Giulio
    JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ECONOMICS, 2012, 96 (5-6) : 485 - 494
  • [35] Distributional Implications of Tax Evasion: Evidence from the Lab
    Doerrenberg, Philipp
    Duncan, Denvil
    PUBLIC FINANCE REVIEW, 2014, 42 (06) : 720 - 744
  • [36] Transparency and Tax Evasion: Evidence from the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (FATCA)
    De Simone, Lisa
    Lester, Rebecca
    Markle, Kevin
    JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING RESEARCH, 2020, 58 (01) : 105 - 153
  • [37] Corporate tax evasion: Evidence from international trade
    Bussy, Adrien
    EUROPEAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2023, 159
  • [38] GOVERNMENT SIZE AND TAX EVASION: EVIDENCE FROM CHINA
    Li, Lixing
    Ma, Guangrong
    PACIFIC ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2015, 20 (02) : 346 - 364
  • [39] THE INTERGENERATIONAL CAUSAL EFFECT OF TAX EVASION: EVIDENCE FROM THE COMMUTER TAX ALLOWANCE IN AUSTRIA
    Frimmel, Wolfgang
    Halla, Martin
    Paetzold, Joerg
    JOURNAL OF THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC ASSOCIATION, 2019, 17 (06) : 1843 - 1880
  • [40] Model of Tax Planning and Firm Value Relationship with Tax Amnesty as a Control Variable: Evidence from Indonesia
    Santoso, Muhammad Rifky
    Maksum, Azhar
    Ramli
    Bukit, Rina Br.
    QUALITY-ACCESS TO SUCCESS, 2023, 24 (194): : 118 - 126