Evaluating and Ranking the Supplier Selection Criteria for Additive Manufacturing Firms Using Best-Worst Method

被引:3
|
作者
Ambilkar, Priya [1 ]
Verma, Priyanka [1 ]
Das, Debabrata [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Inst Ind Engn, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
关键词
Additive manufacturing; Supply chain Management; Supplier evaluation; Best-worst method (BWM); FRAMEWORK;
D O I
10.1007/978-3-031-24816-0_13
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Additive manufacturing (AM) is a well-known technology applied in different industrial applications which have gained more attention over the last three decades. The crucial aspect of AM is designing and managing the supply chain for AM parts. The most critical strategic decision in the initial process of supply chain management is selecting and evaluating suppliers. Selecting an appropriate supplier can lead to reducing costs in supply chain management. Therefore, there is a need to choose a reliable supplier to enhance the performance of their supply network. For the first-time, supplier selection criteria evaluation for the AM domain is examined in this study. This study proposes multi-criteria decision-making based on the best-worst methods to prioritize AM firm's raw material supplier selection criteria. The best-worst method is generally applied to get the criteria weight. The reliability of the comparisons is checked using a consistency ratio. Then the most important and least important criteria are obtained and considered while selecting a supplier in AM based on the result. Finally, the study concluded the importance of supplier selection for AM. This study further provides a promising avenue for future research opportunities.
引用
收藏
页码:161 / 175
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Selection of suitable additive manufacturing machine and materials through best-worst method (BWM)
    Palanisamy, Manivel
    Pugalendhi, Arivazhagan
    Ranganathan, Rajesh
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 107 (5-6): : 2345 - 2362
  • [2] Priority ranking for the best-worst method
    Tu, Jiancheng
    Wu, Zhibin
    Pedrycz, Witold
    [J]. INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2023, 635 : 42 - 55
  • [3] Prioritizing Competitive Capabilities in Additive Manufacturing Systems Using Best-Worst Method
    Dohale, Vishwas
    Akarte, Milind
    Verma, Priyanka
    [J]. ADVANCES IN BEST-WORST METHOD, BWM2022, 2023, : 117 - 128
  • [4] Multi-criteria sustainable supplier selection using piecewise linear value function and fuzzy best-worst method
    Ghoushchi, Saeid Jafarzadeh
    Khazaeili, Mohammad
    Amini, Amir
    Osgooei, Elnaz
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT & FUZZY SYSTEMS, 2019, 37 (02) : 2309 - 2325
  • [5] Best-worst method for robot selection
    Ali, Asif
    Rashid, Tabasam
    [J]. SOFT COMPUTING, 2021, 25 (01) : 563 - 583
  • [6] Ranking of choice cues for smartphones using the Best-Worst scaling method
    Pinto, Luis
    Kaynak, Erdener
    Chow, Clement S. F.
    Zhang, Lida L.
    [J]. ASIA PACIFIC JOURNAL OF MARKETING AND LOGISTICS, 2019, 31 (01) : 223 - 245
  • [7] Green Supplier Selection Using Improved TOPSIS and Best-Worst Method Under Intuitionistic Fuzzy Environment
    Tian, Zhang-Peng
    Zhang, Hong-Yu
    Wang, Jian-Qiang
    Wang, Tie-Li
    [J]. INFORMATICA, 2018, 29 (04) : 773 - 800
  • [8] GREEN SUPPLIER SELECTION BASED ON THE INFORMATION SYSTEM PERFORMANCE EVALUATION USING THE INTEGRATED BEST-WORST METHOD
    Fazlollahtabar, Hamed
    Kazemitash, Navid
    [J]. FACTA UNIVERSITATIS-SERIES MECHANICAL ENGINEERING, 2021, 19 (03) : 345 - 360
  • [9] Bioethanol facility location selection using best-worst method
    Kheybari, Siamak
    Kazemi, Mostafa
    Rezaei, Jafar
    [J]. APPLIED ENERGY, 2019, 242 : 612 - 623
  • [10] Sustainable Lean Six Sigma project selection in manufacturing environments using best-worst method
    Swarnakar, Vikas
    Singh, A. R.
    Antony, Jiju
    Tiwari, Anil Kr
    Garza-Reyes, Jose Arturo
    [J]. TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT & BUSINESS EXCELLENCE, 2023, 34 (7-8) : 990 - 1014