Prioritizing Competitive Capabilities in Additive Manufacturing Systems Using Best-Worst Method

被引:2
|
作者
Dohale, Vishwas [1 ]
Akarte, Milind [1 ]
Verma, Priyanka [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Inst Ind Engn, Operat & Supply Chain Management, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
关键词
Additive manufacturing system; Manufacturing strategy; Competitive capabilities; Best-Worst Method (BWM); Prioritization; SELECTION; FLEXIBILITY;
D O I
10.1007/978-3-031-24816-0_10
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Additive manufacturing systems (AMS) have been realized as one of the cutting-edge technologies that can revolutionize the traditional way of producing goods. It is expected that by deploying AMS, the manufacturing firms can effectively manage the trade-off between volume-variety and cost-flexibility. This study is developed at the outset to explore the level of competitive capabilities, namely cost, quality, delivery speed and reliability, flexibility, performance, and innovativeness, achieved by deploying AMS through an operations management lens. In this work, the Best-Worst method (BWM) is used to compute the weights of the competitive capabilities within AMS using the opinions of five informed respondents from AM domain. The competitive capabilities are further prioritized based on their aggregated weights. The results demonstrated that flexibility and innovativeness are the most critical competitive capabilities that can be retained through AMS implementation. Contrary, when employing AMS, delivery speed and cost are the least achieved capabilities over which firms need to make a possible compromise. This study will benefit academicians and readers in understanding the core competencies of AMS. Based on the desired competitive capabilities, a particular firm can align its production facilities in line with AMS.
引用
收藏
页码:117 / 128
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Evaluating and Ranking the Supplier Selection Criteria for Additive Manufacturing Firms Using Best-Worst Method
    Ambilkar, Priya
    Verma, Priyanka
    Das, Debabrata
    [J]. ADVANCES IN BEST-WORST METHOD, BWM2022, 2023, : 161 - 175
  • [2] Selection of suitable additive manufacturing machine and materials through best-worst method (BWM)
    Palanisamy, Manivel
    Pugalendhi, Arivazhagan
    Ranganathan, Rajesh
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 107 (5-6): : 2345 - 2362
  • [3] Fuzzy applications of Best-Worst method in manufacturing environment
    Sofuoglu, Mehmet Alper
    [J]. SOFT COMPUTING, 2020, 24 (01) : 647 - 659
  • [4] Best-Worst Method and Simple Additive Weighting for Selection Problems in Process Systems Engineering
    Migo-Sumagang, Maria Victoria
    Aviso, Kathleen B.
    Tan, Raymond R.
    [J]. PROCESS INTEGRATION AND OPTIMIZATION FOR SUSTAINABILITY, 2024, 8 (04) : 1309 - 1316
  • [5] The Balancing Role of Best and Worst in Best-Worst Method
    Rezaei, Jafar
    [J]. ADVANCES IN BEST-WORST METHOD, BWM2021, 2022, : 1 - 15
  • [6] The behavioural best-worst method
    Kheybari, Siamak
    Ishizaka, Alessio
    [J]. EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2022, 209
  • [7] Best-worst Tradeoff method
    Liang, Fuqi
    Brunelli, Matteo
    Rezaei, Jafar
    [J]. INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2022, 610 : 957 - 976
  • [8] Prioritisation of drivers of sustainable additive manufacturing using best worst method
    Agrawal, Rohit
    Vinodh, S.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABLE ENGINEERING, 2021, 14 (06) : 1587 - 1603
  • [9] Prioritizing Surgical Cancellation Factors Based on a Fuzzy Best-Worst Method: A Case Study
    Momen, S.
    Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, R.
    Ghasemkhani, A.
    Shahnejat-Bushehri, S.
    Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, H.
    [J]. IFAC PAPERSONLINE, 2019, 52 (13): : 112 - 117
  • [10] Sustainable facility relocation in agriculture systems using the GIS and best-worst method
    Yousefi-Babadi, Abolghasem
    Bozorgi-Amiri, Ali
    Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, Reza
    [J]. KYBERNETES, 2022, 51 (07) : 2343 - 2382