Evaluating and Ranking the Supplier Selection Criteria for Additive Manufacturing Firms Using Best-Worst Method

被引:3
|
作者
Ambilkar, Priya [1 ]
Verma, Priyanka [1 ]
Das, Debabrata [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Inst Ind Engn, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
关键词
Additive manufacturing; Supply chain Management; Supplier evaluation; Best-worst method (BWM); FRAMEWORK;
D O I
10.1007/978-3-031-24816-0_13
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Additive manufacturing (AM) is a well-known technology applied in different industrial applications which have gained more attention over the last three decades. The crucial aspect of AM is designing and managing the supply chain for AM parts. The most critical strategic decision in the initial process of supply chain management is selecting and evaluating suppliers. Selecting an appropriate supplier can lead to reducing costs in supply chain management. Therefore, there is a need to choose a reliable supplier to enhance the performance of their supply network. For the first-time, supplier selection criteria evaluation for the AM domain is examined in this study. This study proposes multi-criteria decision-making based on the best-worst methods to prioritize AM firm's raw material supplier selection criteria. The best-worst method is generally applied to get the criteria weight. The reliability of the comparisons is checked using a consistency ratio. Then the most important and least important criteria are obtained and considered while selecting a supplier in AM based on the result. Finally, the study concluded the importance of supplier selection for AM. This study further provides a promising avenue for future research opportunities.
引用
收藏
页码:161 / 175
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] On solving the Best-Worst Method in multi-criteria decision-making
    Beemsterboer, D. J. C.
    Hendrix, E. M. T.
    Claassen, G. D. H.
    [J]. IFAC PAPERSONLINE, 2018, 51 (11): : 1660 - 1665
  • [42] Evaluating effective criteria on customer satisfaction using the best-worst method and optimizing resource allocation, case study Iran aseman airlines
    Dehnavi, Morteza Narimani
    Yazdian, Seyed Ahmad
    Sadjadi, Seyed Jafar
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AIR TRANSPORT MANAGEMENT, 2023, 109
  • [43] Estimating commuting modal split by using the Best-Worst Method
    Duleba, Szabolcs
    Moslem, Sarbast
    Esztergar-Kiss, Domokos
    [J]. EUROPEAN TRANSPORT RESEARCH REVIEW, 2021, 13 (01)
  • [44] Estimating commuting modal split by using the Best-Worst Method
    Szabolcs Duleba
    Sarbast Moslem
    Domokos Esztergár-Kiss
    [J]. European Transport Research Review, 2021, 13
  • [45] Evaluation and ranking of failures in manufacturing process by combining best-worst method and VIKOR under type-2 fuzzy environment
    Aleksic, Aleksandar
    Milanovic, Dragan D.
    Komatina, Nikola
    Tadic, Danijela
    [J]. EXPERT SYSTEMS, 2023, 40 (02)
  • [46] An integrated group fuzzy best-worst method and combined compromise solution with Bonferroni functions for supplier selection in reverse supply chains
    Tavana, Madjid
    Shaabani, Akram
    Di Caprio, Debora
    Bonyani, Abbas
    [J]. CLEANER LOGISTICS AND SUPPLY CHAIN, 2021, 2
  • [47] An Integrated Best-Worst and Interval Type-2 Fuzzy TOPSIS Methodology for Green Supplier Selection
    Yucesan, Melih
    Mete, Suleyman
    Serin, Faruk
    Celik, Erkan
    Gul, Muhammet
    [J]. MATHEMATICS, 2019, 7 (02)
  • [48] Supplier Selection After Pandemic in SMEs Using Fuzzy Best Worst Method and Fuzzy WASPAS
    Sari, Irem Ucal
    Pesek, Arda
    Bozukyan, Kami
    [J]. INTELLIGENT AND FUZZY SYSTEMS: DIGITAL ACCELERATION AND THE NEW NORMAL, INFUS 2022, VOL 1, 2022, 504 : 387 - 395
  • [49] Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Approach for Selection of Requirements Elicitation Techniques based on the Best-Worst Method
    Aljuhani, Abdulmajeed
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED COMPUTER SCIENCE AND APPLICATIONS, 2021, 12 (11) : 732 - 738
  • [50] Sustainable waste disposal technology selection: The stratified best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method
    Torkayesh, Ali Ebadi
    Malmir, Behnam
    Asadabadi, Mehdi Rajabi
    [J]. WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2021, 122 : 100 - 112