Role of Cerebral Embolic Protection Devices in Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: An Updated Meta-Analysis

被引:3
|
作者
Kaur, Arpanjeet [2 ]
Dhaliwal, Arshdeep S. [3 ]
Sohal, Sumit [4 ]
Gwon, Yeongjin [5 ]
Gupta, Soumya [2 ]
Bhatia, Kirtipal [6 ]
Dominguez, Abel Casso [6 ]
Basman, Craig [7 ]
Tamis-Holland, Jacqueline [1 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Cleveland Clin, Dept Cardiovasc Med, Main Campus,9500 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH 44195 USA
[2] Icahn Sch Med Mt Sinai Morningside West New York, Dept Med, New York, NY USA
[3] Icahn Sch Med Mt Sinai, Populat Hlth Sci & Policy, New York, NY USA
[4] Newark Beth Israel Med Ctr Newark, Div Cardiovasc Med, Newark, NJ USA
[5] Univ Nebraska Med Ctr, Dept Biostat, Omaha, NE USA
[6] Icahn Sch Med Mt Sinai Morningside New York, Div Cardiol, New York, NY USA
[7] Lenox Hill Hosp, Div Cardiol, New York, NY USA
[8] Cleveland Clin, Dept Cardiovasc Med, Main Campus, Cleveland, OH USA
来源
关键词
cerebral embolic protection devices; stroke; transcatheter aortic valve replacement; RANDOMIZED EVALUATION; IMPLANTATION; STENOSIS; LESIONS;
D O I
10.1161/JAHA.123.030587
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Cerebral embolic protection devices (CEPD) capture embolic material in an attempt to reduce ischemic brain injury during transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Prior reports have indicated mixed results regarding the benefits of these devices. With new data emerging, we performed an updated meta-analysis examining the effect of CEPD during transcatheter aortic valve replacement on various clinical, neurological, and safety parameters.Methods and Results A comprehensive review of electronic databases was performed comparing CEPD and no-CEPD in transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Primary clinical outcome was all-cause stroke. Secondary clinical outcomes were disabling stroke and all-cause mortality. Neurological outcomes included worsening of the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score, Montreal Cognitive Assessment score from baseline at discharge, presence of new ischemic lesions, and total lesion volume on neuroimaging. Safety outcomes included major or minor vascular complications and stage 2 or 3 acute kidney injury. Seven randomized controlled trials with 4016 patients met the inclusion criteria. There was no statistically significant difference in the primary clinical outcome of all-cause stroke; secondary clinical outcomes of disabling stroke, all-cause mortality, neurological outcomes of National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score worsening, Montreal Cognitive Assessment worsening, presence of new ischemic lesions, or total lesion volume on diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging between CEPD versus control groups. There was no statistically significant difference in major or minor vascular complications or stage 2 or 3 acute kidney injury between the groups.Conclusions The use of CEPD in transcatheter aortic valve replacement was not associated with a statistically significant reduction in the risk of clinical, neurological, and safety outcomes.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] EFFICACY OF CEREBRAL PROTECTION DEVICE DURING TRANSCATHETER AORTIC VALVE REPLACEMENT (TAVR): AN UPDATED META-ANALYSIS
    Rivera, Frederick B.
    De Luna, Deogracias
    Ansay, Marie Francesca
    Collado, Fareed Segundo
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2023, 81 (08) : 1061 - 1061
  • [32] CEREBRAL EMBOLIC PROTECTION FOR TRANSCATHETER AORTIC VALVE REPLACEMENT: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS OF RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS
    Ali, Rimsha
    Amirian, Aslan
    Mirza, Taaha
    Soni, Bosky
    Rajak, Kripa
    Aljassani, Khaldoon
    Halder, Anupam
    Cunningham, Jessica
    Ramesh, Navitha
    CHEST, 2023, 164 (04) : 145A - 146A
  • [33] Meta-Analysis of Usefulness of Cerebral Embolic Protection During Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation
    Ahmad, Yousif
    Howard, James P.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2021, 146 : 69 - 73
  • [34] Cerebral embolic protection devices during transcatheter aortic valve implantation: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
    Reddy, R. K.
    Ahmad, Y.
    Arnold, A. D.
    Howard, J. P.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2023, 44
  • [35] ROUTINE USE OF CEREBRAL EMBOLIC PROTECTION DEVICE DURING TRANSCATHETER AORTIC VALVE REPLACEMENT: WHAT DOES THE DATA SUPPORT? AN UPDATED META-ANALYSIS
    Atallah, Issam
    Das, Debapria
    Nafee, Tarek
    Lin, Chien-Jung
    Harjai, Kishore J.
    Nasir, Ammar
    Forsberg, Michael
    Mikhalkova, Deana
    Mar, Philip L.
    Mani, Kartik
    Sampath-Kumar, Sridhar
    Prasad, Sunil
    Cahill, Anne
    Verma, Divya Ratan
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2023, 81 (08) : 819 - 819
  • [36] Cerebral Embolic Protection During Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement
    Yashima, Fumiaki
    Briasoulis, Alexandros
    Kuno, Toshiki
    Noguchi, Masahiko
    Ahmad, Hasan
    Zaid, Syed
    Goldberg, Joshua B.
    Malik, Aaqib H.
    Tang, Gilbert H. L.
    CARDIOVASCULAR REVASCULARIZATION MEDICINE, 2022, 36 : 9 - 13
  • [37] Cerebral embolic protection systems for transcatheter aortic valve replacement
    Gasior, Tomasz
    Mangner, Norman
    Bijoch, Julia
    Wojakowski, Wojciech
    JOURNAL OF INTERVENTIONAL CARDIOLOGY, 2018, 31 (06) : 891 - 898
  • [38] Transcarotid transcatheter aortic valve replacement with cerebral embolic protection
    McGrath, Daniel
    Salehi, Payam
    Weintraub, Andrew
    Zhan, Yong
    JOURNAL OF CARDIAC SURGERY, 2022, 37 (06) : 1779 - 1782
  • [39] OUTCOMES WITH CEREBRAL EMBOLIC PROTECTION DEVICES DURING TRANSCATHETER AORTICVALVE REPLACEMENT: AN UPDATED META-ANALYSIS OF RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS
    Al-Abdouh, Ahmad
    Mhanna, Mohammed
    Jabri, Ahmad
    Alhuneafat, Laith
    Zaalouk, Mostafa
    Ghanem, Fares H.
    Altibi, Ahmed
    Dewaswala, Nakeya
    Bhopalwala, Huzefa
    Barbarawi, Mahmoud
    Kundu, Amartya
    Elgendy, Islam
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2023, 81 (08) : 820 - 820
  • [40] Cerebral protection devices in transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a clinical meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Wang, Nelson
    Phan, Kevin
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC DISEASE, 2018, 10 (03) : 1927 - +