Translation, Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Psychometric Validation of the Arabic Version of the Cardiac Rehabilitation Barriers Scale (CRBS-A) with Strategies to Mitigate Barriers

被引:2
|
作者
Aljehani, Raghdah [1 ]
Grace, Sherry L. L. [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Aburub, Aseel [5 ]
Turk-Adawi, Karam [6 ]
Ghisi, Gabriela Lima de Melo [3 ]
机构
[1] King Abdullah Med City, Rehabil Dept, Mecca 24246, Saudi Arabia
[2] York Univ, Fac Hlth, Toronto, ON M3J 1P3, Canada
[3] Univ Hlth Network, Toronto Rehabil Inst, KITE, Toronto, ON M4G 2V6, Canada
[4] Univ Hlth Network, Univ Toronto, Peter Munk Cardiac Ctr, Toronto, ON M5G 2C4, Canada
[5] Appl Sci Private Univ, Dept Physiotherapy, Amman 11931, Jordan
[6] Qatar Univ, Coll Hlth Sci, QU Hlth, Doha 2713, Qatar
关键词
cardiac rehabilitation; questionnaires and surveys; psychometrics; validity (epidemiology); access to health care; referral; AVAILABILITY; PERCEPTIONS;
D O I
10.3390/healthcare11081196
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) utilization is low, particularly in Arabic-speaking countries. This study aimed to translate and psychometrically validate the CR Barriers Scale in Arabic (CRBS-A), as well as strategies to mitigate them. The CRBS was translated by two bilingual health professionals independently, followed by back-translation. Next, 19 healthcare providers, followed by 19 patients rated the face and content validity (CV) of the pre-final versions, providing input to improve cross-cultural applicability. Then, 207 patients from Saudi Arabia and Jordan completed the CRBS-A, and factor structure, internal consistency, construct, and criterion validity were assessed. Helpfulness of mitigation strategies was also assessed. For experts, item and scale CV indices were 0.8-1.0 and 0.9, respectively. For patients, item clarity and mitigation helpfulness scores were 4.5 +/- 0.1 and 4.3 +/- 0.1/5, respectively. Minor edits were made. For the test of structural validity, four factors were extracted: time conflicts/lack of perceived need and excuses; preference to self-manage; logistical problems; and health system issues and comorbidities. Total CRBS-A alpha was 0.90. Construct validity was supported by a trend for an association of total CRBS with financial insecurity regarding healthcare. Total CRBS-A scores were significantly lower in patients who were referred to CR (2.8 +/- 0.6) vs. those who were not (3.6 +/- 0.8), confirming criterion validity (p = 0.04). Mitigation strategies were considered very helpful (mean = 4.2 +/- 0.8/5). The CRBS-A is reliable and valid. It can support identification of top barriers to CR participation at multiple levels, and then strategies for mitigating them can be implemented.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric validation of the Persian version of the Cardiac Rehabilitation Barriers Scale (CRBS-P)
    Ghanbari-Firoozabadi, Mahdieh
    Mirzaei, Masoud
    Nasab, Mohammadreza Vafaii
    Grace, Sherry L.
    Okati-Aliabad, Hassan
    Madadizadeh, Farzan
    Dadras, Hakimeh
    Amrolahi, Najmeh
    Entezari, Mohamadmehdi
    Sadrbafghi, Seyed Mahmood
    BMJ OPEN, 2020, 10 (06):
  • [2] Translation, Cross-Cultural Adaptation, and Psychometric Validation of the Chinese/Mandarin Cardiac Rehabilitation Barriers Scale (CRBS-C/M)
    Liu, Xia
    Fowokan, Adeleke
    Grace, Sherry L.
    Ding, Biao
    Meng, Shu
    Chen, Xiu
    Xia, Yinghua
    Zhang, Yaqing
    REHABILITATION RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2021, 2021
  • [3] Translation, Cross-cultural Adaptation and Psychometric Validation of the Korean-Language Cardiac Rehabilitation Barriers Scale (CRBS-K) (vol 41, pg 858, 2017)
    Baek, Sora
    Park, Hee-won
    Lee, Yookyung
    Grace, Sherry L.
    Kim, Won-Seok
    ANNALS OF REHABILITATION MEDICINE-ARM, 2019, 43 (01): : 118 - 118
  • [4] Translation, Adaptation, and Validation of the Malay Version of the Cardiac Rehabilitation Barriers Scale
    Chai, Li Sze
    Siop, Sidiah
    Putit, Zabidah
    Lim, Lily
    Gunggu, Azylina
    Tie, Suk Fong
    JOURNAL OF NURSING RESEARCH, 2020, 28 (01)
  • [5] Psychometric validation of the Cardiac Rehabilitation Barriers Scale Revised (CRBS-R) for hybrid delivery
    Grace, Sherry L.
    Ghanbari, Mahdieh
    da Cruz, Mayara Moura Moura Alves
    Vanderlei, Luiz Carlos Marques
    Ghisi, Gabriela Lima de Melo
    BMJ OPEN, 2024, 14 (10):
  • [6] Translation, Cross-Cultural Adaptation, and Psychometric Validation of the English Version of the Postural Awareness Scale
    Colgan, Dana Dharmakaya
    Green, Kaylie
    Eddy, Ashley
    Brems, Christiane
    Sherman, Karen J.
    Cramer, Holger
    Oken, Barry
    Christopher, Michael
    PAIN MEDICINE, 2021, 22 (11) : 2686 - 2699
  • [7] Psychometric validation of the Cardiac Rehabilitation Barriers Scale
    Shanmugasegaram, Shamila
    Gagliese, Lucia
    Oh, Paul
    Stewart, Donna E.
    Brister, Stephanie J.
    Chan, Victoria
    Grace, Sherry L.
    CLINICAL REHABILITATION, 2012, 26 (02) : 152 - 164
  • [8] Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric validation of the Korean version of rehabilitation complexity scale for the measurement of complex rehabilitation needs
    Lee, Hoo Young
    Park, Jung Hyun
    Kim, Tae-Woo
    MEDICINE, 2021, 100 (24) : E26259
  • [9] Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Arabic Version of the Rating Anxiety in Dementia Scale
    Feghali, Yara
    Koubaissy, Hiba
    Fares, Youssef
    Abou Abbas, Linda
    CLINICAL GERONTOLOGIST, 2020, 43 (03) : 320 - 330
  • [10] Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Psychometric Validation of the Turkish Version of Pain Resilience Scale
    Dereli, Muge
    Kahraman, Turhan
    France, Christopher R.
    EVALUATION & THE HEALTH PROFESSIONS, 2023, 46 (02) : 140 - 151