Uncertainty quantification analysis with arbitrary polynomial chaos method: Application in slipstream effect of propeller aircraft

被引:0
|
作者
Li, Yao [1 ]
Si, Haiqing [1 ]
Wu, Xiaojun [2 ]
Zhao, Wei [2 ]
Li, Gen [1 ]
Qiu, Jingxuan [1 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Univ Aeronaut & Astronaut, Coll Gen Aviat & Flight, Nanjing 211106, Peoples R China
[2] China Aerodynam Res & Dev Ctr, Mianyang 621000, Peoples R China
来源
MODERN PHYSICS LETTERS B | 2023年 / 37卷 / 20期
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Aerodynamic characteristic; arbitrary polynomial chaos; uncertainty quantification; propeller slipstream; computational fluid dynamics; SAMPLING EFFICIENCY; PROPAGATION; SIMULATIONS; STORAGE;
D O I
10.1142/S0217984923500495
中图分类号
O59 [应用物理学];
学科分类号
摘要
The slipstream effect of propeller aircraft has a major impact on aircraft aerodynamic characteristics. Predicting the interaction of propeller slipstream on flow field over a complete aircraft has been an important topic in the field of fluid mechanics. In the flight test, we found that parameters in the flight data of propeller aircraft exhibit significant stochastic characteristics, and the mechanism of the influence of these stochastic parameters on aerodynamic characteristics of propeller aircraft needs to be further studied. Therefore, we combine arbitrary Polynomial Chaos method with Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) according to the characteristics of stochastic parameter distribution, propose an uncertainty CFD analysis method, and apply it to the aerodynamic uncertainty analysis of propeller aircraft. Results show that the standard deviation (Std) of the pressure coefficient Cp on the wing surface will form an extreme region at windward side and separation position, respectively, which will gradually decrease with the flow direction. Furthermore, the slipstream will reduce the local Std on wing surface, and the downwash caused by slipstream will change the Std distribution on the leading edge of the horizontal tail.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Uncertainty Quantification by the Nonintrusive Polynomial Chaos Expansion with an Adjustment Strategy
    Shimoyama, Koji
    Inoue, Akihiro
    AIAA JOURNAL, 2016, 54 (10) : 3107 - 3116
  • [42] Sparse polynomial chaos expansions for uncertainty quantification in thermal tomography
    Sykora, Jan
    Havelka, Jan
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL AND APPLIED MATHEMATICS, 2024, 436
  • [43] Uncertainty Quantification of Differential Algebraic Equations Using Polynomial Chaos
    Saha, Premjit
    Singh, Tarunraj
    Dargush, Gary
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL AND NONLINEAR DYNAMICS, 2021, 16 (10):
  • [44] Polynomial chaos for uncertainty quantification in flow simulations for metrological applications
    Schmelter, Sonja
    Fiebach, Andre
    Weissenbrunner, Andreas
    TM-TECHNISCHES MESSEN, 2016, 83 (02) : 71 - 76
  • [45] Uncertainty quantification of Lithium-ion Batteries with Polynomial Chaos
    Orcioni, Simone
    Conti, Massimo
    2020 IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON CIRCUITS AND SYSTEMS (ISCAS), 2020,
  • [46] Polynomial Chaos based Uncertainty Quantification in Hamiltonian and Chaotic Systems
    Pasini, Jose Miguel
    Sahai, Tuhin
    2013 IEEE 52ND ANNUAL CONFERENCE ON DECISION AND CONTROL (CDC), 2013, : 1113 - 1118
  • [47] Uncertainty Quantification in Molecular Signals Using Polynomial Chaos Expansion
    Abbaszadeh M.
    Moutsinas G.
    Thomas P.J.
    Guo W.
    Guo, Weisi (weisi.guo@warwick.ac.uk), 2018, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., United States (04): : 248 - 256
  • [48] Derivative-Enhanced Rational Polynomial Chaos for Uncertainty Quantification
    Sidhu, Karanvir S.
    Khazaka, Roni
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON CIRCUITS AND SYSTEMS I-REGULAR PAPERS, 2024, 71 (04) : 1832 - 1841
  • [49] UNCERTAINTY QUANTIFICATION IN STOCHASTIC SYSTEMS USING POLYNOMIAL CHAOS EXPANSION
    Sepahvand, K.
    Marburg, S.
    Hardtke, H. -J.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF APPLIED MECHANICS, 2010, 2 (02) : 305 - 353
  • [50] Uncertainty Quantification and Polynomial Chaos Techniques in Computational Fluid Dynamics
    Najm, Habib N.
    ANNUAL REVIEW OF FLUID MECHANICS, 2009, 41 : 35 - 52