Reproduction in the era of genomics and automation

被引:0
|
作者
Chebel, Ricardo C. [1 ,2 ]
Bisinotto, Rafael S. [1 ]
Giordano, Julio [3 ]
Maggiolino, Aristide [4 ]
de Palo, Pasquale [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Florida, Dept Large Anim Clin Sci, Gainesville, FL 32610 USA
[2] Univ Florida, Dept Anim Sci, Gainesville, FL 32608 USA
[3] Cornell Univ, Dept Anim Sci, Ithaca, NY 14853 USA
[4] Univ Bari Aldo Moro, Dept Vet Med, I-70010 Valenzano, Italy
关键词
automation; dairy cattle; genomics; reproduction; TIMED ARTIFICIAL-INSEMINATION; DAIRY-COWS; ESTROUS BEHAVIOR; FERTILITY TRAITS; ESTRUS DETECTION; GENETIC MERIT; RISK-FACTORS; PHYSICAL-ACTIVITY; EARLY-LACTATION; ENERGY-BALANCE;
D O I
10.1071/RD23173
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Much progress has been made in the reproductive efficiency of lactating dairy cows across the USA in the past 20 years. The standardisation of evaluation of reproductive efficiency, particularly with greater focus on metrics with lesser momentum and less lag-time such as 21-day pregnancy rates (21-day PR), and the recognition that subpar reproductive efficiency negatively impacted profitability were major drivers for the changes that resulted in such progress. Once it became evident that the genetic selection of cattle for milk yield regardless of fertility traits was associated with reduced fertility, geneticists raced to identify fertility traits that could be incorporated in genetic selection programs with the hopes of improving fertility of lactating cows. Concurrently, reproductive physiologists developed ovulation synchronisation protocols such that after sequential treatment with exogenous hormones, cows could be inseminated at fixed time and without detection of oestrus and still achieve acceptable pregnancy per service. These genetic and reproductive management innovations, concurrently with improved husbandry and nutrition of periparturient cows, quickly started to move reproductive efficiency of lactating dairy cows to an upward trend that continues today. Automation has been adopted in Israel and European countries for decades, but only recently have these automated systems been more widely adopted in the USA. The selection of dairy cattle based on genetic indexes that result in positive fertility traits (e.g. daughter pregnancy rate) is positively associated with follicular growth, resumption of ovarian cycles postpartum, body condition score and insulin-like growth factor 1 concentration postpartum, and intensity of oestrus. Collectively, these positive physiological characteristics result in improved reproductive performance. Through the use of automated monitoring devices (AMD), it is possible to identify cows that resume cyclicity sooner after calving and have more intense oestrus postpartum, which are generally cows that have a more successful periparturient period. Recent experiments have demonstrated that it may be possible to adopt targeted reproductive management, utilising ovulation synchronisation protocols for cows that do not have intense oestrus postpartum and relying more heavily on insemination at AMD-detected oestrus for cows that display an intense oestrus postpartum. This strategy is likely to result in tailored hormonal therapy that will be better accepted by the public, will increase the reliance on oestrus for insemination, will improve comfort and reduce labour by reducing the number of injections cows receive in a lactation, and will allow for faster decisions about cows that should not be eligible for insemination. Technology and automation are ubiquitous to everyday life, including in dairy herds. Genomic testing of female dairy animals is now common in several herds, allowing for the selection for fertility traits associated with earlier resumption of oestrus cycles and more intense oestruses. Through the use of automated sensors, we are now able to identify cows that resume oestrus sooner after calving, which are more likely to conceive to spontaneous oestrus. Targeted reproductive management, based on characteristics of oestruses recorded early after calving, will result in tailored hormonal therapy, improved comfort, and reduced labour. Source: Ricardo C. Chebel. Created using Biorender.com.
引用
收藏
页码:51 / 65
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Conservation of biodiversity in the genomics era
    Supple, Megan A.
    Shapiro, Beth
    GENOME BIOLOGY, 2018, 19
  • [42] Prokaryotic systematics in the genomics era
    Zhi, Xiao-Yang
    Zhao, Wei
    Li, Wen-Jun
    Zhao, Guo-Ping
    ANTONIE VAN LEEUWENHOEK INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GENERAL AND MOLECULAR MICROBIOLOGY, 2012, 101 (01): : 21 - 34
  • [43] Bacterial nomenclature in the era of genomics
    Pallen, M. J.
    NEW MICROBES AND NEW INFECTIONS, 2021, 44
  • [44] Informed Consent in the Genomics Era
    Rego, Shannon
    Grove, Megan E.
    Cho, Mildred K.
    Ormond, Kelly E.
    COLD SPRING HARBOR PERSPECTIVES IN MEDICINE, 2020, 10 (08): : 1 - 13
  • [45] Conservation of biodiversity in the genomics era
    Megan A. Supple
    Beth Shapiro
    Genome Biology, 19
  • [46] Malaria Genomics in the Era of Eradication
    Neafsey, Daniel E.
    Volkman, Sarah K.
    COLD SPRING HARBOR PERSPECTIVES IN MEDICINE, 2017, 7 (08):
  • [47] The modular era of functional genomics
    Eran Segal
    Stuart K Kim
    Genome Biology, 4 (5)
  • [48] Animal breeding in the genomics era
    Ibanez-Escriche, Noelia
    Simianer, Henner
    ANIMAL FRONTIERS, 2016, 6 (01) : 4 - 5
  • [49] 8 Myogenesis in the Genomics Era
    Blais, Alexandre
    JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 2015, 427 (11) : 2023 - 2038
  • [50] Autoimmunity in the era of genomics and proteomics
    Hershko, Alon Y.
    Naparstek, Yaakov
    AUTOIMMUNITY REVIEWS, 2006, 5 (04) : 230 - 233