Reproduction in the era of genomics and automation

被引:0
|
作者
Chebel, Ricardo C. [1 ,2 ]
Bisinotto, Rafael S. [1 ]
Giordano, Julio [3 ]
Maggiolino, Aristide [4 ]
de Palo, Pasquale [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Florida, Dept Large Anim Clin Sci, Gainesville, FL 32610 USA
[2] Univ Florida, Dept Anim Sci, Gainesville, FL 32608 USA
[3] Cornell Univ, Dept Anim Sci, Ithaca, NY 14853 USA
[4] Univ Bari Aldo Moro, Dept Vet Med, I-70010 Valenzano, Italy
关键词
automation; dairy cattle; genomics; reproduction; TIMED ARTIFICIAL-INSEMINATION; DAIRY-COWS; ESTROUS BEHAVIOR; FERTILITY TRAITS; ESTRUS DETECTION; GENETIC MERIT; RISK-FACTORS; PHYSICAL-ACTIVITY; EARLY-LACTATION; ENERGY-BALANCE;
D O I
10.1071/RD23173
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Much progress has been made in the reproductive efficiency of lactating dairy cows across the USA in the past 20 years. The standardisation of evaluation of reproductive efficiency, particularly with greater focus on metrics with lesser momentum and less lag-time such as 21-day pregnancy rates (21-day PR), and the recognition that subpar reproductive efficiency negatively impacted profitability were major drivers for the changes that resulted in such progress. Once it became evident that the genetic selection of cattle for milk yield regardless of fertility traits was associated with reduced fertility, geneticists raced to identify fertility traits that could be incorporated in genetic selection programs with the hopes of improving fertility of lactating cows. Concurrently, reproductive physiologists developed ovulation synchronisation protocols such that after sequential treatment with exogenous hormones, cows could be inseminated at fixed time and without detection of oestrus and still achieve acceptable pregnancy per service. These genetic and reproductive management innovations, concurrently with improved husbandry and nutrition of periparturient cows, quickly started to move reproductive efficiency of lactating dairy cows to an upward trend that continues today. Automation has been adopted in Israel and European countries for decades, but only recently have these automated systems been more widely adopted in the USA. The selection of dairy cattle based on genetic indexes that result in positive fertility traits (e.g. daughter pregnancy rate) is positively associated with follicular growth, resumption of ovarian cycles postpartum, body condition score and insulin-like growth factor 1 concentration postpartum, and intensity of oestrus. Collectively, these positive physiological characteristics result in improved reproductive performance. Through the use of automated monitoring devices (AMD), it is possible to identify cows that resume cyclicity sooner after calving and have more intense oestrus postpartum, which are generally cows that have a more successful periparturient period. Recent experiments have demonstrated that it may be possible to adopt targeted reproductive management, utilising ovulation synchronisation protocols for cows that do not have intense oestrus postpartum and relying more heavily on insemination at AMD-detected oestrus for cows that display an intense oestrus postpartum. This strategy is likely to result in tailored hormonal therapy that will be better accepted by the public, will increase the reliance on oestrus for insemination, will improve comfort and reduce labour by reducing the number of injections cows receive in a lactation, and will allow for faster decisions about cows that should not be eligible for insemination. Technology and automation are ubiquitous to everyday life, including in dairy herds. Genomic testing of female dairy animals is now common in several herds, allowing for the selection for fertility traits associated with earlier resumption of oestrus cycles and more intense oestruses. Through the use of automated sensors, we are now able to identify cows that resume oestrus sooner after calving, which are more likely to conceive to spontaneous oestrus. Targeted reproductive management, based on characteristics of oestruses recorded early after calving, will result in tailored hormonal therapy, improved comfort, and reduced labour. Source: Ricardo C. Chebel. Created using Biorender.com.
引用
收藏
页码:51 / 65
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Personalized medicine in the era of genomics
    Burke, Wylie
    Psaty, Bruce M.
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2007, 298 (14): : 1682 - 1684
  • [32] Chromatin structure in the genomics era
    Rando, Oliver J.
    TRENDS IN GENETICS, 2007, 23 (02) : 67 - 73
  • [33] Pulling teeth into the genomics era
    Diehl, SR
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN DENTAL ASSOCIATION, 2006, 137 (06): : 710 - +
  • [34] Default taxonomy and the genomics era
    van Passel, MWJ
    Bart, A
    van der Ende, A
    MICROBIOLOGY-SGM, 2005, 151 : 2818 - 2820
  • [35] Prokaryotic systematics in the genomics era
    Xiao-Yang Zhi
    Wei Zhao
    Wen-Jun Li
    Guo-Ping Zhao
    Antonie van Leeuwenhoek, 2012, 101 : 21 - 34
  • [36] A new era in the genomics of bacteria
    Dougan, Gordon
    Weinstock, George M.
    CURRENT OPINION IN MICROBIOLOGY, 2010, 13 (05) : 616 - 618
  • [37] Trait Correlations in the Genomics Era
    Saltz, Julia B.
    Hessel, Frances C.
    Kelly, Morgan W.
    TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 2017, 32 (04) : 279 - 290
  • [38] Consent and Autonomy in the Genomics Era
    Rachel Horton
    Anneke Lucassen
    Current Genetic Medicine Reports, 2019, 7 : 85 - 91
  • [39] Phytopathogen emergence in the genomics era
    Thynne, Elisha
    McDonald, Megan C.
    Solomon, Peter S.
    TRENDS IN PLANT SCIENCE, 2015, 20 (04) : 246 - 255
  • [40] GENOMICS ERA IN THE NUTRITION FIELD
    Grigore-Gurgu, Leontina
    ANNALS OF THE UNIVERSITY DUNAREA DE JOS OF GALATI, FASCICLE VI-FOOD TECHNOLOGY, 2018, 42 (02) : 168 - 184