Predictive Factors for Gleason Score Upgrading in Patients with Prostate Cancer after Radical Prostatectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta- Analysis

被引:6
|
作者
Wang, Yang [1 ]
Chen, Xiaoke [1 ]
Liu, Kun [2 ]
Liu, Ruijuan [1 ]
Li, Liangliang [2 ]
Yin, Chaoshan [2 ]
Song, Peixing [2 ]
机构
[1] Zhuhai Hosp, Zhuhai Golden Bay Ctr Hosp, Dept Urol, Guangdong Prov Peoples Hosp, Zhuhai, Peoples R China
[2] Anhui Med Univ, Fuyang Hosp, Dept Urol, Fuyang, Peoples R China
关键词
Gleason score upgrading; Prostate cancer; Risk factors; Meta-analysis; PERINEURAL INVASION; GRADING SYSTEM; BIOPSY; RISK; SIZE; CANDIDATES; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1159/000528873
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: Previous studies have revealed that Gleason score upgrading (GSU) was closely related to an increased biochemical recurrence rate and adverse oncologic outcomes in patients with prostate cancer (PC). Therefore, we performed a meta-analysis to determine the predictive factors for GSU following radical prostatectomy (RP). Methods: We performed an extensive literature search using PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane in September 2022. In order to calculate the pooled odds ratio (OR), standardized mean difference (SMD), and 95% confidence intervals, a fixed effect or a DerSimonian and Laird random effect was applied. Results: Twenty-six studies included 18,745 PC patients that were available for further analysis. Our results revealed that GSU was significantly correlated with age (summary SMD = 0.13; p = 0.004), prostate volume (PV) (summary SMD = -0.19;p < 0.001), preoperative PSA (p-PSA) (summary SMD = 0.18; p < 0.001), PSA density (PSAD) (summary SMD = 0.40; p < 0.001), number of positive cores (summary SMD = 0.28; p = 0.001), percentage of positive cores (summary SMD = 0.36; p < 0.001), Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PIRADS) scores (>3/<= 3) (summary OR = 2.27; p = 0.001), clinical T stage (>T2/<= T2) (summary OR = 1.73; p < 0.001), positive surgical margins (PSM) ( summary OR = 2.12; p < 0.001), extraprostatic extension (EPE) (summary OR = 2.73; p < 0.001), pathological T stage (>T2/<= T2) (summary OR = 3.45; p < 0.001), perineural invasion (PNI) (summary OR = 2.40; p = 0.008), and neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) (summary SMD = 0.50; p < 0.001). However, we found that GSU was not significantly correlated with body mass index (BMI) (summary SMD = -0.02; p = 0.602). Moreover, our sensitivity and subgroup analyses showed that the findings were reliable. Conclusions: Age, PV, p-PSA, PSAD, number of positive cores, percentage of positive cores, PI-RADS score, clinical T stage, PSM, EPE, pathological T stage, PNI, and NLR are independent factors predicting GSU following RP. The findings may be helpful in risk stratification and personalized treatment in PC patients. (c) 2023 S. Karger AG, Basel
引用
收藏
页码:460 / 479
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Prostate Volume is A Predictor of Gleason Score Upgrading after Radical Prostatectomy in Low-Risk Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Zou, Qianming
    Cao, Jiadong
    Chen, Zhiqiang
    Wang, Shusheng
    Gu, Chiming
    Li, Siyi
    Xiang, Songtao
    UROLOGY JOURNAL, 2024, 21 (01) : 20 - 28
  • [2] Predictive factors in the upgrading of Gleason score in prostate cancer patients
    Koh, Nan Jun
    Chia, Sing Joo
    Tan, Jing Yuan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2016, 23 : 69 - 69
  • [3] FACTORS FOR PREDICTION OF GLEASON SCORE UPGRADING AFTER RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY
    Yang, Ching-Wei
    Lin, Tzu-Ping
    Huang, Yi-Hsiu
    Chung, Hsiao-Jen
    Kuo, Junne-Yih
    Huang, William
    Wu, Howard
    Chang, Yen-Hwa
    Lin, Alex
    Chen, Kuang-Kuo
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2013, 189 (04): : E607 - E608
  • [4] Role of inflammatory factors in prediction of Gleason score and its upgrading in localized prostate cancer patients after radical prostatectomy
    Wang, Shuo
    Ji, Yongpeng
    Ma, Jinchao
    Du, Peng
    Cao, Yudong
    Yang, Xiao
    Yu, Ziyi
    Yang, Yong
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2023, 12
  • [5] Predictive Factors for Positive Surgical Margins in Patients With Prostate Cancer After Radical Prostatectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Zhang, Lijin
    Zhao, Hu
    Wu, Bin
    Zha, Zhenlei
    Yuan, Jun
    Feng, Yejun
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2021, 10
  • [6] Factors predicting Gleason score 6 upgrading after radical prostatectomy
    Milonas, Daimantas
    Grybas, Aivaras
    Auskalnis, Stasys
    Gudinaviciene, Inga
    Baltrimavicius, Ruslanas
    Kincius, Marius
    Jievaltas, Mindaugas
    CENTRAL EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2011, 64 (04) : 205 - 208
  • [7] Analysis of risk factors for Gleason score upgrading after radical prostatectomy in a Chinese cohort
    Zhang, Baoling
    Wu, Shangrong
    Zhang, Yang
    Guo, Mingyu
    Liu, Ranlu
    CANCER MEDICINE, 2021, 10 (21): : 7772 - 7780
  • [8] Is Small Prostate Volume a Predictor of Gleason Score Upgrading after Radical Prostatectomy?
    Chung, Mun Su
    Lee, Seung Hwan
    Lee, Dong Hoon
    Chung, Byung Ha
    YONSEI MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2013, 54 (04) : 902 - 906
  • [9] Risk factors for Gleason Score upgrading following radical prostatectomy
    Alchin, David R.
    Murphy, Declan
    Lawrentschuk, Nathan
    MINERVA UROLOGICA E NEFROLOGICA, 2017, 69 (05) : 459 - 465
  • [10] Preoperative prostate health index predicts adverse pathology and Gleason score upgrading after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer
    Vojtech Novak
    Stepan Vesely
    Hana Luksanová
    Richard Prusa
    Otakar Capoun
    Vojtech Fiala
    Olga Dolejsová
    Hana Sedlacková
    Radek Kucera
    Jiri Stejskal
    Miroslav Zalesky
    Marko Babjuk
    BMC Urology, 20