Single-port laparoscopic versus single-port robotic right hemicolectomy: Postoperative short-term outcomes

被引:6
|
作者
Lim, Ji Ha [1 ]
Yun, Seong Hyeon [2 ]
Lee, Woo Yong [2 ]
Kim, Hee Cheol [2 ]
Cho, Yong Beom [2 ]
Huh, Jung Wook [2 ]
Park, Yoon Ah [2 ]
Shin, Jung Kyong [2 ]
机构
[1] Sungkyunkwan Univ, Samsung Changwon Hosp, Dept Surg, Sch Med, Chang Won, South Korea
[2] Sungkyunkwan Univ, Samsung Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Sch Med, 81 Irwon Ro, Seoul 06351, South Korea
关键词
bowel movement; da Vinci SP((R))system; operative time; single port laparoscopy; single port robot; RIGHT COLON-CANCER; OPEN COLECTOMY; ONCOLOGIC OUTCOMES; OPEN SURGERY; INCISION; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1002/rcs.2509
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: This study aimed to compare the short-term postoperative outcomes of single-port robotic (SPR) using da Vinci SP (R) system and single port laparoscopic (SPL) right hemicolectomy and determine whether the novel SPR system is safe and feasible. Methods: From January 2019 to December 2020, a total of 141 patients (41 patients for SPR and 100 patients for SPL) who electively underwent right hemicolectomy for colon cancer performed by a single surgeon were included in the study. Results: The time to the first bowel movement was 3 (range, 1-4) days after surgery in the SPR group and 3 (2-9, range) days in the SPL group (p = 0.017). However, there were no differences in pathologic outcomes or postoperative complications. Conclusions: SPR is a safe and feasible surgical technique and has an advantage in the time to first postoperative bowel movement over SPL with no other complications.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Single-port laparoscopic colectomy
    Costedio, M. M.
    Remzi, F. H.
    TECHNIQUES IN COLOPROCTOLOGY, 2013, 17 (01) : S29 - S34
  • [32] Initial experience with a suprapubic single-port robotic right hemicolectomy in patients with colon cancer
    Song, S. H.
    Kim, H. J.
    Choi, G. -S.
    Park, J. S.
    Park, S. Y.
    Lee, S. -M.
    Choi, J. A.
    TECHNIQUES IN COLOPROCTOLOGY, 2021, 25 (09) : 1065 - 1071
  • [33] Clinical significance of single-port laparoscopic splenectomy: comparison of single-port and multiport laparoscopic procedure
    Han, Eui Soo
    You, Young Kyoung
    Kim, Dong Goo
    Lee, Jun Suh
    Kim, Eun Young
    Lee, Soo Ho
    Hong, Tae Ho
    Na, Gun Hyung
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL TREATMENT AND RESEARCH, 2015, 89 (02) : 55 - 60
  • [34] Laparoscopic Single-Port Versus Traditional Multi-Port Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
    Casaccia, Marco
    Palombo, Denise
    Razzore, Andrea
    Firpo, Emma
    Gallo, Fabio
    Fornaro, Rosario
    JSLS-JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC SURGEONS, 2019, 23 (03)
  • [35] Laparoscopic cholecystolithotomy versus laparoscopic (single-port and four-port) cholecystectomy
    Klimenko, V. M.
    Syvolap, D., V
    ZAPOROZHYE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2018, (02) : 172 - 177
  • [36] Single-Port Laparoscopic Retroperitoneal Surgery Using a Modified Single-Port Device in Urology
    Shi, Lixin
    Cal, Wei
    Dong, Juan
    Zhang, Xu
    Gao, Jiangping
    Song, Tao
    Sun, Shengkun
    Zu, Qiang
    Wang, Wei
    UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS, 2014, 92 (01) : 83 - 88
  • [37] Single-port and four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: difference in outcomes
    Kunkala, M.
    Bingener, J.
    Park, M.
    Harmsen, W. Scott
    McConico, A.
    Lombardo, K. Reid
    MINERVA CHIRURGICA, 2013, 68 (02) : 155 - 162
  • [38] Single-Port Robotic Applications in Urology
    Nguyen, Tuan Thanh
    Basilius, Jacob
    Ali, Sohrab Naushad
    Dobbs, Ryan W. W.
    Lee, David I. I.
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2023, 37 (06) : 688 - 699
  • [39] Robotic Single-Port Hernia Surgery
    Hanh Tran
    JSLS-JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC SURGEONS, 2011, 15 (03) : 309 - 314
  • [40] SINGLE-PORT ROBOTIC RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY
    White, Michael A.
    Haber, Georges-Pascal
    Khanna, Rakesh
    Autorino, Riccardo
    Forest, Sylvain
    Stein, Robert J.
    Kaouk, Jihad H.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2010, 183 (04): : E188 - E188