Single-port laparoscopic versus single-port robotic right hemicolectomy: Postoperative short-term outcomes

被引:6
|
作者
Lim, Ji Ha [1 ]
Yun, Seong Hyeon [2 ]
Lee, Woo Yong [2 ]
Kim, Hee Cheol [2 ]
Cho, Yong Beom [2 ]
Huh, Jung Wook [2 ]
Park, Yoon Ah [2 ]
Shin, Jung Kyong [2 ]
机构
[1] Sungkyunkwan Univ, Samsung Changwon Hosp, Dept Surg, Sch Med, Chang Won, South Korea
[2] Sungkyunkwan Univ, Samsung Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Sch Med, 81 Irwon Ro, Seoul 06351, South Korea
关键词
bowel movement; da Vinci SP((R))system; operative time; single port laparoscopy; single port robot; RIGHT COLON-CANCER; OPEN COLECTOMY; ONCOLOGIC OUTCOMES; OPEN SURGERY; INCISION; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1002/rcs.2509
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: This study aimed to compare the short-term postoperative outcomes of single-port robotic (SPR) using da Vinci SP (R) system and single port laparoscopic (SPL) right hemicolectomy and determine whether the novel SPR system is safe and feasible. Methods: From January 2019 to December 2020, a total of 141 patients (41 patients for SPR and 100 patients for SPL) who electively underwent right hemicolectomy for colon cancer performed by a single surgeon were included in the study. Results: The time to the first bowel movement was 3 (range, 1-4) days after surgery in the SPR group and 3 (2-9, range) days in the SPL group (p = 0.017). However, there were no differences in pathologic outcomes or postoperative complications. Conclusions: SPR is a safe and feasible surgical technique and has an advantage in the time to first postoperative bowel movement over SPL with no other complications.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Selected Commentary to "The short-term outcomes of conventional and single-port laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer"
    Weiss, H.
    Schirnhofer, J.
    Biebl, M.
    Pimpl, K.
    Mittermair, C.
    Obrist, C.
    EUROPEAN SURGERY-ACTA CHIRURGICA AUSTRIACA, 2012, 44 (01): : 62 - 63
  • [22] Single-port robotic subcostal major pulmonary resection using the single-port robotic system
    Lee, Jun Hee
    Hong, Jeong In
    Kim, Hyun Koo
    WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2024, 48 (03) : 713 - 722
  • [23] ROBOTIC SINGLE-PORT VERSUS LAPAROSCOPIC DONOR NEPHRECTOMY: AN INSTITUTIONAL ANALYSIS
    Chin, Chih Peng
    Garden, Evan
    Levy, Micah
    Ravivarapu, Krishna
    Al-Alao, Osama
    Araya, Joseph Sewell
    Florman, Sander
    Arvelakis, Antonios
    Herron, Daniel
    Chin, Edward
    Palese, Michael
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2022, 207 (05): : E603 - E603
  • [24] Single-port laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy
    Gao, Pan
    Cai, He
    Peng, Bing
    Cai, Yunqiang
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2023, 37 (02): : 1166 - 1172
  • [25] Single-port laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy
    Pan Gao
    He Cai
    Bing Peng
    Yunqiang Cai
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2023, 37 : 1166 - 1172
  • [26] Single-port laparoscopic appendicectomy
    MacDonald, Euan R.
    Ahmed, Irfan
    ANNALS OF THE ROYAL COLLEGE OF SURGEONS OF ENGLAND, 2009, 91 (06) : 519 - 520
  • [27] Single-Port Laparoscopic Appendectomy
    Kim, Hyung Jin
    Lee, Jae Im
    Lee, Sang Chul
    Kim, Soo Hong
    Lee, In Kyu
    Lee, Yoon Suk
    Cho, Hyeon-Min
    Oh, Seong Taek
    JOURNAL OF THE KOREAN SURGICAL SOCIETY, 2010, 78 (05): : 338 - 342
  • [28] Single-port laparoscopic gastrostomy
    Karpelowsky, J.
    Numanoglu, A.
    Rode, H.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC SURGERY, 2008, 18 (04) : 285 - 286
  • [29] Single-port laparoscopic colectomy
    M. M. Costedio
    F. H. Remzi
    Techniques in Coloproctology, 2013, 17 : 29 - 34
  • [30] Initial experience with a suprapubic single-port robotic right hemicolectomy in patients with colon cancer
    S. H. Song
    H. J. Kim
    G.-S. Choi
    J. S. Park
    S. Y. Park
    S.-M. Lee
    J. A. Choi
    Techniques in Coloproctology, 2021, 25 : 1065 - 1071