Evaluation of laboratory and on-farm tests to estimate colostrum quality for dairy cows

被引:2
|
作者
Roeder, M. [1 ]
Borchardt, S. [1 ]
Heuwieser, W. [1 ]
Rauch, E. [2 ]
Sargent, R. [3 ]
Sutter, F. [1 ]
机构
[1] Free Univ Berlin, Fac Vet Med, Clin Anim Reprod, Konigsweg 65, D-14163 Berlin, Germany
[2] Univ Vet Med, Unit Anim Welf Behav Sci Anim Hyg & Husb, Vet Str 13-R, D-80539 Munich, Germany
[3] Saskatoon Colostrum Co Ltd, Saskatoon, SK S7K 6A2, Canada
关键词
colostrum quality; on-farm test; colostrum management; IMMUNOGLOBULIN-G CONCENTRATION; BOVINE COLOSTRUM; RADIAL IMMUNODIFFUSION; BRIX REFRACTOMETRY; IGG CONCENTRATION; PASSIVE-IMMUNITY; MANAGEMENT; ELISA; CALF; QUANTIFICATION;
D O I
10.3168/jds.2023-23467
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
The objectives of this study were to evaluate differ-ent analytical methods to determine colostrum quality in dairy cattle, including one laboratory-based method (ELISA) and 4 on-farm tests. We hypothesized that the colostral IgG concentration using different analytical methods, such as ELISA (mg/mL), digital Brix refrac-tometer (% Brix), colostrometer (specific gravity and mg/mL), an outflow funnel (seconds), and a lateral flow assay (mg/mL), were highly correlated with the reference method, radial immunodiffusion (RID; mg/ mL) and would generate comparable results. Colostrum samples were collected from 209 Holstein Friesian cows on 2 commercial dairy farms in Germany. Colostrum weight and colostrum temperature were measured. Test characteristics, such as optimum thresholds, sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC) were de-termined using a receiver operating characteristic curve analyses for each test. Out of 209 colostrum samples assessed by RID, 186 (89%) samples had high quality (> 50 mg IgG/mL), while 23 colostrum samples (11%) showed poor quality with IgG concentrations less than 50 mg/mL. The mean IgG concentration (+SD) was 101.3 + 45.9 mg/mL and the range was 6.0 to 244.3 mg/mL. The Pearson correlation coefficient (r) between RID and ELISA was r = 0.78. In comparison to RID, Pearson correlation coefficients for the on-farm tests were: r = 0.79 (digital Brix refractometry), r = 0.58 (colostrometer: specific gravity), r = 0.61 (colostrom-eter: temperature corrected), r = 0.26 (outflow funnel) and r = 0.43 (lateral flow assay), respectively. The op-timal threshold to identify high-quality colostrum using ELISA was 50.8 mg/mL with sensitivity 91.3%, speci-ficity 92.3%, and AUC of 0.94. For the on-farm tests sensitivity ranged from 95.7% (Brix refractometry) to 60.9% (lateral flow assay). Specificity ranged from 88.6% (lateral flow assay) to 75.9% (colostrometer: temperature corrected). The AUC ranged from 0.93 (Brix refractometry) to 0.73 (outflow funnel). Based on the AUC, ELISA (0.94) and Brix refractometry (0.93) can be considered highly accurate. In conclusion, the ELISA is accurate to assess colostrum quality. Regard-ing the on-farm tests only the digital Brix refractom-eter and the colostrometer were adequate to determine colostrum quality.
引用
收藏
页码:9164 / 9173
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Evaluation of on-farm tools for colostrum quality measurement
    Bartier, A. L.
    Windeyer, M. C.
    Doepel, L.
    JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2015, 98 (03) : 1878 - 1884
  • [2] Colostrum Quality Assessment in Dairy Goats: Use of an On-Farm Optical Refractometer
    Perez-Marin, Carlos C.
    Cano, David
    Arrebola, Francisco A.
    Petrusha, Valerii H.
    Skliarov, Pavlo M.
    Entrenas, Jose A.
    Perez-Marin, Dolores C.
    BIOLOGY-BASEL, 2023, 12 (04):
  • [3] Comparison of the use a refractometer and colostrometry to estimate the quality of colostrum in dairy cows
    Nava-Cruz, Alfonso
    Flores-Salas, Jessica
    Torres-Rodriguez, Edir
    Arellano-Rodriguez, Fernando
    Robles-Trillo, Pedro
    Alvarado-Espino, Alan
    Delgado-Gonzalez, Ramon
    ABANICO VETERINARIO, 2024, 15 : 17 - 17
  • [4] On-farm management decisions to improve beef quality of market dairy cows
    Rogers, CA
    Fitzgerald, AC
    Carr, MA
    Covey, BR
    Thomas, JD
    Looper, ML
    JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2004, 87 (05) : 1558 - 1564
  • [5] Evaluation of Brix refractometer as an on-farm tool for colostrum IgG evaluation in Italian beef and dairy cattle
    Pisello, Lorenzo
    Forte, Claudio
    D'Avino, Nicoletta
    Pisano, Rocco
    Hyatt, Doreene Rose
    Rueca, Fabrizio
    Passamonti, Fabrizio
    JOURNAL OF DAIRY RESEARCH, 2021, 88 (02) : 189 - 193
  • [6] On-farm evaluation of multiparametric models to predict subacute ruminal acidosis in dairy cows
    Coppa, M.
    Villot, C.
    Martin, C.
    Silberberg, M.
    ANIMAL, 2023, 17 (06)
  • [7] Role of mastitis in on-farm deaths of Finnish dairy cows
    Hagner, K. A.
    Nordgren, H. S.
    Sarjokari, K.
    Sukura, A.
    Rajala-Schultz, P. J.
    JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2024, 107 (08) : 5962 - 5973
  • [8] Reliability and inter-test relationship of tests for on-farm assessment of dairy cows' relationship to humans
    Windschnurer, Ines
    Schmied, Claudia
    Boivin, Xavier
    Waiblinger, Susanne
    APPLIED ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR SCIENCE, 2008, 114 (1-2) : 37 - 53
  • [9] EVALUATION OF ON-FARM QUICK TESTS ON SLURRIES FROM SOUTHERN CHILE DAIRY FARMS
    Salazar, Francisco
    Rosas, Marianela U.
    CHILEAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH, 2012, 72 (03): : 444 - 448
  • [10] Effect of on-farm commercial batch pasteurization of colostrum on colostrum and serum immunoglobulin concentrations in dairy calves
    Godden, SM
    Smith, S
    Feirtag, JM
    Green, LR
    Wells, SJ
    Fetrow, JP
    JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2003, 86 (04) : 1503 - 1512