Evaluation of laboratory and on-farm tests to estimate colostrum quality for dairy cows

被引:2
|
作者
Roeder, M. [1 ]
Borchardt, S. [1 ]
Heuwieser, W. [1 ]
Rauch, E. [2 ]
Sargent, R. [3 ]
Sutter, F. [1 ]
机构
[1] Free Univ Berlin, Fac Vet Med, Clin Anim Reprod, Konigsweg 65, D-14163 Berlin, Germany
[2] Univ Vet Med, Unit Anim Welf Behav Sci Anim Hyg & Husb, Vet Str 13-R, D-80539 Munich, Germany
[3] Saskatoon Colostrum Co Ltd, Saskatoon, SK S7K 6A2, Canada
关键词
colostrum quality; on-farm test; colostrum management; IMMUNOGLOBULIN-G CONCENTRATION; BOVINE COLOSTRUM; RADIAL IMMUNODIFFUSION; BRIX REFRACTOMETRY; IGG CONCENTRATION; PASSIVE-IMMUNITY; MANAGEMENT; ELISA; CALF; QUANTIFICATION;
D O I
10.3168/jds.2023-23467
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
The objectives of this study were to evaluate differ-ent analytical methods to determine colostrum quality in dairy cattle, including one laboratory-based method (ELISA) and 4 on-farm tests. We hypothesized that the colostral IgG concentration using different analytical methods, such as ELISA (mg/mL), digital Brix refrac-tometer (% Brix), colostrometer (specific gravity and mg/mL), an outflow funnel (seconds), and a lateral flow assay (mg/mL), were highly correlated with the reference method, radial immunodiffusion (RID; mg/ mL) and would generate comparable results. Colostrum samples were collected from 209 Holstein Friesian cows on 2 commercial dairy farms in Germany. Colostrum weight and colostrum temperature were measured. Test characteristics, such as optimum thresholds, sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC) were de-termined using a receiver operating characteristic curve analyses for each test. Out of 209 colostrum samples assessed by RID, 186 (89%) samples had high quality (> 50 mg IgG/mL), while 23 colostrum samples (11%) showed poor quality with IgG concentrations less than 50 mg/mL. The mean IgG concentration (+SD) was 101.3 + 45.9 mg/mL and the range was 6.0 to 244.3 mg/mL. The Pearson correlation coefficient (r) between RID and ELISA was r = 0.78. In comparison to RID, Pearson correlation coefficients for the on-farm tests were: r = 0.79 (digital Brix refractometry), r = 0.58 (colostrometer: specific gravity), r = 0.61 (colostrom-eter: temperature corrected), r = 0.26 (outflow funnel) and r = 0.43 (lateral flow assay), respectively. The op-timal threshold to identify high-quality colostrum using ELISA was 50.8 mg/mL with sensitivity 91.3%, speci-ficity 92.3%, and AUC of 0.94. For the on-farm tests sensitivity ranged from 95.7% (Brix refractometry) to 60.9% (lateral flow assay). Specificity ranged from 88.6% (lateral flow assay) to 75.9% (colostrometer: temperature corrected). The AUC ranged from 0.93 (Brix refractometry) to 0.73 (outflow funnel). Based on the AUC, ELISA (0.94) and Brix refractometry (0.93) can be considered highly accurate. In conclusion, the ELISA is accurate to assess colostrum quality. Regard-ing the on-farm tests only the digital Brix refractom-eter and the colostrometer were adequate to determine colostrum quality.
引用
收藏
页码:9164 / 9173
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Evaluation of an on-farm method to assess colostrum IgG content in sows
    Balzani, A.
    Cordell, H. J.
    Edwards, S. A.
    ANIMAL, 2016, 10 (04) : 643 - 648
  • [22] EVALUATION OF 4 ON-FARM PROGESTERONE TEST KITS AS AN AID TO REPRODUCTIVE MANAGEMENT IN DAIRY-COWS
    RAJAMAHENDRAN, R
    WONG, B
    ROBINSON, J
    SHELFORD, JA
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 1990, 70 (01) : 207 - 210
  • [23] Factors of influence on the quality of colostrum from dairy cows
    Schouz, H.
    Knutzen, G.
    Fischer, B.
    Waehner, M.
    ZUCHTUNGSKUNDE, 2011, 83 (06): : 396 - 405
  • [24] Validation of On-Farm Bacteriological Systems for Endometritis Diagnosis in Postpartum Dairy Cows
    Barbeau-Gregoire, Nicolas
    Boyer, Alexandre
    Rousseau, Marjolaine
    Gauthier, Marie-Lou
    Dubuc, Jocelyn
    ANIMALS, 2021, 11 (09):
  • [25] Welfare Challenges of Dairy Cows in India Identified Through On-Farm Observations
    Mullan, Siobhan
    Bunglavan, Surej J.
    Rowe, Elizabeth
    Barrett, David C.
    Lee, Michael R. E.
    Ananth, Deepa
    Tarlton, John
    ANIMALS, 2020, 10 (04):
  • [26] On-farm feeding interventions to increase milk production in lactating dairy cows
    Wanapat, Metha
    Foiklang, Suban
    Phesatcha, Kampanat
    Paoinn, Chainarong
    Ampapon, Thiwakorn
    Norrapoke, Thitima
    Kang, Sungchhang
    TROPICAL ANIMAL HEALTH AND PRODUCTION, 2017, 49 (04) : 829 - 833
  • [27] On-farm feeding interventions to increase milk production in lactating dairy cows
    Metha Wanapat
    Suban Foiklang
    Kampanat Phesatcha
    Chainarong Paoinn
    Thiwakorn Ampapon
    Thitima Norrapoke
    Sungchhang Kang
    Tropical Animal Health and Production, 2017, 49 : 829 - 833
  • [28] Assessment of different methods to estimate bovine colostrum quality on farm
    Bartens, M-C
    Drillich, M.
    Rychli, K.
    Iwersen, M.
    Arnholdt, T.
    Meyer, L.
    Klein-Jobstl, D.
    NEW ZEALAND VETERINARY JOURNAL, 2016, 64 (05) : 263 - 267
  • [29] Evaluation of an on-farm method to assess colostrum IgG content in hyperprolific sows
    Papatsiros, Vasileios
    Argyris, Georgios
    Papakonstantinou, Georgios
    Meletis, Eleftherios
    Tsekouras, Nikolaos
    Kantas, Dimitrios
    Kostoulas, Polychronis
    ANIMAL REPRODUCTION SCIENCE, 2022, 239
  • [30] A Scoping Review of On-Farm Colostrum Management Practices for Optimal Transfer of Immunity in Dairy Calves
    Robbers, Lisa
    Jorritsma, Ruurd
    Nielen, Mirjam
    Koets, Ad
    FRONTIERS IN VETERINARY SCIENCE, 2021, 8