On-farm management decisions to improve beef quality of market dairy cows

被引:12
|
作者
Rogers, CA
Fitzgerald, AC
Carr, MA
Covey, BR
Thomas, JD
Looper, ML
机构
[1] New Mexico State Univ, Dept Anim & Range Sci, Las Cruces, NM 88003 USA
[2] Angelo State Univ, Dept Agr, San Angelo, TX 76909 USA
关键词
dairy cow; carcass characteristic; antibiotic; additional feeding;
D O I
10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(04)73308-1
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
A 3-phase study was conducted to assess on-farm management decisions to reduce antibiotic residue violations and improve carcass characteristics in market ( cull) dairy cows. In Phase 1, questionnaires were mailed to dairy producers (n = 142) to determine current on-farm management strategies for reducing antibiotic residues in market dairy cattle. In Phase 2, Holstein market cows ( n = 77) were assigned randomly to each of the 3 feeding treatments (0, 30, or 60 d). Average daily gain (ADG), body condition score (BCS), and carcass characteristics were assessed. Phase 3 determined the meat withdrawal time of Holstein cows ( n = 62) administered procaine penicillin G. Eighty-six percent of dairy farms responding to the questionnaire had at least one cow condemned annually, and no producer had a designated feeding protocol for market cows prior to selling. In Phase 2, ADG was greater in cows fed for 30 d (1.4 +/- 0.6 kg/d) than in cows fed for 60 d (0.9 +/- 0.4 kg/d). Additional feeding did not influence the carcass characteristics studied with the exception of kidney, pelvic and heart fat, which was higher in cows fed for 60 d compared with those fed for 0 and 30 d. In Phase 3, 31% of cows treated with procaine penicillin G exceeded the 10-d label withdrawal recommendation by an average of 3.1 +/- 1.9 d. Feeding market cows may not influence carcass characteristics, but can increase ADG and may ensure that recommended meat withdrawal times for antibiotics are exceeded.
引用
收藏
页码:1558 / 1564
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Do dairy producers market and manage dairy cows to improve beef quality?
    Tozer, P. R.
    Varga, G. A.
    Kniffen, D.
    Henning, W. R.
    [J]. POULTRY SCIENCE, 2004, 83 : 165 - 165
  • [2] Do dairy producers market and manage dairy cows to improve beef quality?
    Tozer, P. R.
    Varga, G. A.
    Knif-fen, D.
    Henning, W. R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2004, 87 : 165 - 165
  • [3] Do dairy producers market and manage dairy cows to improve beef quality?
    Tozer, P. R.
    Varga, G. A.
    Kniffen, D.
    Henning, W. R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2004, 82 : 165 - 165
  • [4] APPLICATIONS OF AN ON-FARM MICROCOMPUTER FOR DAIRY-HERD MANAGEMENT DECISIONS
    BARTON, EP
    WISNIEWSKI, EW
    SPIKE, TE
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 1979, 62 : 95 - 96
  • [5] Evaluation of laboratory and on-farm tests to estimate colostrum quality for dairy cows
    Roeder, M.
    Borchardt, S.
    Heuwieser, W.
    Rauch, E.
    Sargent, R.
    Sutter, F.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2023, 106 (12) : 9164 - 9173
  • [7] Role of mastitis in on-farm deaths of Finnish dairy cows
    Hagner, K. A.
    Nordgren, H. S.
    Sarjokari, K.
    Sukura, A.
    Rajala-Schultz, P. J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2024, 107 (08) : 5962 - 5973
  • [8] Risk factors for on-farm mortality in beef suckler cows under extensive keeping management
    Motus, Kerli
    Emanuelson, Ulf
    [J]. RESEARCH IN VETERINARY SCIENCE, 2017, 113 : 5 - 12
  • [9] Wastewater management and on-farm dairy processing
    Wrigley, RJ
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF DAIRY TECHNOLOGY, 2004, 59 (02) : 189 - 191
  • [10] Perceptions of on-farm emergency slaughter for dairy cows in British Columbia
    Koralesky, Katherine E.
    Fraser, David
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2019, 102 (01) : 521 - 527