Greenhouse gas emissions from hybrid energy storage systems in future 100% renewable power systems-A Swedish case based on consequential life cycle assessment

被引:26
|
作者
Jiao, Yang [1 ]
Mansson, Daniel [1 ]
机构
[1] KTH Royal Inst Technol, Div Electromagnet Engn, SE-10044 Stockholm, Sweden
关键词
Consequential life cycle assessment; Greenhouse gas emissions; Hybrid energy storage system; Renewable power system; ENVIRONMENTAL-IMPACT; LEVELIZED COST; BATTERIES; TECHNOLOGIES; INTEGRATION; WIND;
D O I
10.1016/j.est.2022.106167
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
To promote the development of renewables, this article evaluates the life cycle greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from hybrid energy storage systems (HESSs) in 100% renewable power systems. The consequential life cycle assessment (CLCA) approach is applied to evaluate and forecast the environmental implications of HESSs. Based on the power system of Sweden, different HESS combinations, which include energy storage (ES) technologies: pumped hydro ES, hydrogen ES, lithium-ion (Li-ion) batteries, lead-acid (PbA) batteries, vanadium redox (VR) batteries, supercapacitors (SCs), and flywheels, are discussed. The results show that for Sweden and similar largescale utility applications, the cradle-to-gate GHG emissions from the HESS contribute to a major share of the life cycle GHG emissions due to the under-utilization of the cycle life. Among the HESSs compared in this study, the Pumped hydro+Li-ion+Flywheel combination exhibits the least life cycle GHG emissions. Moreover, the phasing out of nuclear power brings a severe challenge to the carbon reduction target. However, the introduced HESS manages to reduce GHG emissions from a 100% renewable power system.
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Life cycle assessment of greenhouse gas emissions, water and land use for concentrated solar power plants with different energy backup systems
    Klein, Sharon J. W.
    Rubin, Edward S.
    ENERGY POLICY, 2013, 63 : 935 - 950
  • [12] Development of net energy ratios and life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of large-scale mechanical energy storage systems
    Kapila, S.
    Oni, A. O.
    Gemechu, E. D.
    Kumar, A.
    ENERGY, 2019, 170 : 592 - 603
  • [13] Life Cycle Assessment of Green Methanol Production Based on Multi-Seasonal Modeling of Hybrid Renewable Energy and Storage Systems
    Guleroglu, Huseyin
    Yumurtaci, Zehra
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2025, 17 (02)
  • [14] Life cycle assessment of two emerging sewage sludge-to-energy systems: Evaluating energy and greenhouse gas emissions implications
    Cao, Yucheng
    Pawlowski, Artur
    BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2013, 127 : 81 - 91
  • [15] Life cycle greenhouse gas emissions and energy footprints of utility-scale solar energy systems
    Mehedi, Tanveer Hassan
    Gemechu, Eskinder
    Kumar, Amit
    Applied Energy, 2022, 314
  • [16] Life cycle greenhouse gas emissions and energy footprints of utility-scale solar energy systems
    Mehedi, Tanveer Hassan
    Gemechu, Eskinder
    Kumar, Amit
    APPLIED ENERGY, 2022, 314
  • [17] Comparative life cycle greenhouse gas emissions assessment of battery energy storage technologies for grid applications
    Han, Xiaoqu
    Li, Yanxin
    Nie, Lu
    Huang, Xiaofan
    Deng, Yelin
    Yan, Junjie
    Kourkoumpas, Dimitrios-Sotirios
    Karellas, Sotirios
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2023, 392
  • [18] Optimizing bike sharing systems from the life cycle greenhouse gas emissions perspective
    Luo, Hao
    Zhao, Fu
    Chen, Wei-Qiang
    Cai, Hua
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART C-EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES, 2020, 117
  • [19] Life-Cycle Energy Use and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventory for Water Treatment Systems
    Racoviceanu, Alina I.
    Karney, Bryan W.
    Kennedy, Christopher A.
    Colombo, Andrew F.
    JOURNAL OF INFRASTRUCTURE SYSTEMS, 2007, 13 (04) : 261 - 270
  • [20] Characterization of the life cycle greenhouse gas emissions from wind electricity generation systems
    Kadiyala A.
    Kommalapati R.
    Huque Z.
    International Journal of Energy and Environmental Engineering, 2017, 8 (1) : 55 - 64