Life cycle greenhouse gas emissions and energy footprints of utility-scale solar energy systems

被引:0
|
作者
Mehedi, Tanveer Hassan [1 ]
Gemechu, Eskinder [1 ]
Kumar, Amit [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alberta, Dept Mech Engn, 10-263 Donadeo Innovat Ctr Engn, Edmonton, AB T6G 1H9, Canada
关键词
Energy payback time; Greenhouse gas emissions; Life cycle assessment; Net energy ratio; Solar energy; Utility scale; PHOTOVOLTAIC POWER-GENERATION; LITHIUM-ION BATTERIES; RENEWABLE ENERGY; PV SYSTEMS; ELECTRICITY; STORAGE; CHALLENGES; IMPACTS; MODULES; HYBRID;
D O I
10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.118918
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Grid-connected utility-scale solar PV has emerged as a potential pathway to ensure deep decarbonization of electricity in regions with fossil fuel-dominated energy mixes. Research on utility-scale solar PV projects mainly focuses on assessing technical or economic feasibility. Environmental performance assessments of large-scale solar applications are scarce. There is limited information on the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and energy footprints of utility-scale solar energy systems. Earlier studies conducted on small-scale solar systems have limited application in the grid system. We developed a comprehensive bottom-up life cycle assessment model to evaluate the life cycle GHG emissions and energy profiles of utility-scale solar photovoltaic (PV) system with lithium-ion battery storage to provide a consistent electricity supply to the grid with peak load options. We conducted a case study for a fossil fuel-based energy jurisdiction, Alberta (a western province in Canada). The results of the energy assessment show that raw material extraction, production, and assembly of solar panels are the key drivers, accounting for 53% of the total consumption. Energy consumed during battery manufacturing is responsible for 28%. The system shows a net energy production with a mean net energy ratio as high as 6.6 for two-axis sun tracking orientation. The life cycle GHG emissions range from 98.3 to 149.3 g CO2 eq /kWh with a mean value of 123.8 g CO2 eq /kWh. The largest emissions contribution is due to the manufacturing of batteries, 54% of the total emissions. The solar PV system offers a mean energy payback time of 3.8 years (with a range of 3.3 to 4.2 years). The results are highly sensitive to the expected lifetime of the system, the panel's peak wattage, and process energy consumption at various life cycle stages.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Life cycle greenhouse gas emissions and energy footprints of utility-scale solar energy systems
    Mehedi, Tanveer Hassan
    Gemechu, Eskinder
    Kumar, Amit
    [J]. Applied Energy, 2022, 314
  • [2] Life Cycle Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Utility-Scale Wind Power
    Dolan, Stacey L.
    Heath, Garvin A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ECOLOGY, 2012, 16 : S136 - S154
  • [3] The greenhouse gas emissions' footprint and net energy ratio of utility-scale electro-chemical energy storage systems
    Rahman, Md Mustafizur
    Gemechu, Eskinder
    Oni, Abayomi Olufemi
    Kumar, Amit
    [J]. ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2021, 244 (244)
  • [4] Life cycle energy requirements and greenhouse gas emissions from large scale energy storage systems
    Denholm, P
    Kulcinski, GL
    [J]. ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2004, 45 (13-14) : 2153 - 2172
  • [5] Greenhouse gas footprints of utility-scale photovoltaic facilities at the global scale
    Bosmans, Joyce H. C.
    Dammeier, Louise C.
    Huijbregts, Mark A. J.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2021, 16 (09):
  • [7] Temporal validation of life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of energy systems in China
    Su, Xing
    Zhang, Xu
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2016, 139 : 250 - 257
  • [8] Development of net energy ratios and life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of large-scale mechanical energy storage systems
    Kapila, S.
    Oni, A. O.
    Gemechu, E. D.
    Kumar, A.
    [J]. ENERGY, 2019, 170 : 592 - 603
  • [9] Environmental impacts of utility-scale solar energy
    Hernandez, R. R.
    Easter, S. B.
    Murphy-Mariscal, M. L.
    Maestre, F. T.
    Tavassoli, M.
    Allen, E. B.
    Barrows, C. W.
    Belnap, J.
    Ochoa-Hueso, R.
    Ravi, S.
    Allen, M. F.
    [J]. RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2014, 29 : 766 - 779
  • [10] Utility-Scale Solar Energy Planning for Egypt
    Galal, Noha M.
    [J]. 2013 WORLD CONGRESS ON SUSTAINABLE TECHNOLOGIES (WCST), 2013, : 23 - 28