Understanding how governance emerges in social-ecological systems: insights from archetype analysis

被引:4
|
作者
Aggarwal, Rimjhim M. [1 ]
Anderies, John M. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Arizona State Univ, Coll Global Futures, Sch Sustainabil, Tempe, AZ 85281 USA
[2] Arizona State Univ, Sch Human Evolut & Social Change, Tempe, AZ USA
来源
ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY | 2023年 / 28卷 / 02期
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
archetypes; Asia; emergence; governance; irrigation; social-ecological systems; IRRIGATION; INSTITUTIONS; INFRASTRUCTURE; MANAGEMENT; AGENCIES; COMMONS; DESIGN; INDIA; NEPAL;
D O I
10.5751/ES-14061-280202
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
. This paper is motivated by the question: how does governance emerge within social-ecological systems (SESs)? Addressing this question is critical for fostering sustainable transformations because it directs attention to the context specific and process intensive nature of governance as arising from the internal dynamics (i.e., interplay of feedbacks and interdependencies between the components) of SESs. This contrasts with the commonly held view of governance as an external intervention applied to a system. To systematically examine the recurrent patterns in how the internal dynamics promote/detract from the emergence of different types of governance, we applied archetype analysis to 60 selected cases of irrigation systems from Asia. Drawing inspiration from grid-group typology of cultural theory, we developed four specific archetypes: egalitarian, individualist, hierarchical, and fatalist. To build these archetypes, we applied a robustness framework and several other theories/perspectives to identify the different social-ecological and infrastructural attributes of irrigation SESs, and their interdependencies and feedback structures. We then used these attributes, identified through our theoretical review, to deductively code our selected cases and classify them into the different archetypes. The results show the different configurations of attributes that co-occur in each archetype, and how together these attributes and their inter-relationships lead to specific types of governance. Our archetype analysis also provides several interesting examples of fine-tuning between different SES attributes and how this fine-tuning is being threatened by various social and environmental changes. Through a systematic exploration of recurrent patterns using archetype analysis, our work builds on past efforts to apply ideas from complexity theory-specifically emergence-to unpack the complexities of SESs and offer practical guidance for fostering sustainability.
引用
收藏
页数:25
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Network approaches for understanding rainwater management from a social-ecological systems perspective
    Prager, Steven D.
    Pfeifer, Catherine
    [J]. ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY, 2015, 20 (04):
  • [32] Towards Quantitatively Understanding the Complexity of Social-Ecological Systems——From Connection to Consilience
    Xiao-Bing Hu
    Peijun Shi
    Ming Wang
    Tao Ye
    Mark S.Leeson
    Sander E.van der Leeuw
    Jianguo Wu
    Ortwin Renn
    Carlo Jaeger
    [J]. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 2017, 8 (04) : 343 - 356
  • [33] A quantitative approach to the understanding of social-ecological systems: a case study from the Pyrenees
    Zango-Palau, Anna
    Jolivet, Anais
    Lurgi, Miguel
    Claramunt-Lopez, Bernat
    [J]. REGIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE, 2024, 24 (01)
  • [34] Dynamical systems modeling for structural understanding of social-ecological systems: A primer
    Radosavljevic, Sonja
    Banitz, Thomas
    Grimm, Volker
    Johansson, Lars-Goran
    Lindkvist, Emilie
    Schlueter, Maja
    Ylikoski, Petri
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL COMPLEXITY, 2023, 56
  • [35] From nouns to verbs: How process ontologies enhance our understanding of social-ecological systems understood as complex adaptive systems
    Hertz, Tilman
    Garcia, Maria Mancilla
    Schluter, Maja
    [J]. PEOPLE AND NATURE, 2020, 2 (02) : 328 - 338
  • [36] Towards integrated governance for water, health and social-ecological systems: The watershed governance prism
    Parkes, Margot W.
    Morrison, Karen E.
    Bunch, Martin J.
    Hallstroem, Lars K.
    Neudoerffer, R. Cynthia
    Venema, Henry D.
    Waltner-Toews, David
    [J]. GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS, 2010, 20 (04): : 693 - 704
  • [37] Analysing Groundwater Governance in Uzbekistan through the Lenses of Social-Ecological Systems and Informational Governance
    Schmidt, Sylvia
    Hamidov, Ahmad
    Kasymov, Ulan
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE COMMONS, 2024, 18 (01):
  • [38] New Directions for Understanding the Spatial Resilience of Social-Ecological Systems
    Cumming, Graeme S.
    Morrison, Tiffany H.
    Hughes, Terence P.
    [J]. ECOSYSTEMS, 2017, 20 (04) : 649 - 664
  • [39] Understanding large social-ecological systems: introducing the SESMAD project
    Cox, Michael
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE COMMONS, 2014, 8 (02): : 265 - 276
  • [40] Advances in understanding the evolution of institutions in complex social-ecological systems
    Epstein, Graham
    Morrison, Tiffany H.
    Lien, Aaron
    Gurney, Georgina G.
    Cole, Daniel H.
    Delaroche, Martin
    Tomas, Sergio Villamayor
    Ban, Natalie
    Cox, Michael
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 44 : 58 - 66