Dynamical systems modeling for structural understanding of social-ecological systems: A primer

被引:3
|
作者
Radosavljevic, Sonja [1 ]
Banitz, Thomas [2 ]
Grimm, Volker [2 ]
Johansson, Lars-Goran [1 ,3 ]
Lindkvist, Emilie [1 ]
Schlueter, Maja [1 ]
Ylikoski, Petri [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Stockholm Univ, Stockholm Resilience Ctr, Stockholm, Sweden
[2] UFZ Helmholtz Ctr Environm Res, Dept Ecol Modelling, Leipzig, Germany
[3] Uppsala Univ, Uppsala, Sweden
[4] Univ Helsinki, Sociol, Helsinki, Finland
[5] Linkoping Univ, Inst Analyt Sociol, Linkoping, Sweden
基金
欧洲研究理事会; 瑞典研究理事会;
关键词
Dynamical systems; Stability; Structural understanding; Transient dynamics; Asymptotic dynamics; Attractors; REGIME SHIFTS; RESILIENCE; ECOSYSTEMS; EUTROPHICATION; BISTABILITY; STABILITY; EMERGENCE; TRAPS; SLOW;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecocom.2023.101052
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Dynamical systems modeling (DSM) explores how a system evolves in time when its elements and the relationships between them are known. The basic idea is that the structure of a dynamical system, expressed by coupled differential or difference equations, determines attractors of the system and, in turn, its behavior. This leads to structural understanding that can provide insights into qualitative properties of real systems, including ecological and social-ecological systems (SES). DSM generally does not aim to make specific quantitative predictions or explain singular events, but to investigate consequences of different assumptions about a system's structure. SES dynamics and possible causal relationships in SES get revealed through manipulation of individual interactions and observation of their consequences. Structural understanding is therefore particularly valuable for assessing and anticipating the consequences of interventions or shocks and managing transformation toward sustainability. Taking into account social and ecological dynamics, recognizing that SES may operate on different time scales simultaneously and that achieving an attractor might not be possible or relevant, opens up possibilities for DSM setup and analysis. This also highlights the importance of assumptions and research questions for model results and calls for closer connection between modeling and empirics. Understanding the potential and limitations of DSM in SES research is important because the well-developed and established framework of DSM provides a common language and helps break down barriers to shared understanding and dialog within multidisciplinary teams. In this primer we introduce the basic concepts, methods, and possible insights from DSM. Our target audience are both beginners in DSM and modelers who use other model types, both in ecology and SES research.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Understanding Disturbances and Responses in Social-Ecological Systems
    Schoon, Michael L.
    Cox, Michael E.
    [J]. SOCIETY & NATURAL RESOURCES, 2012, 25 (1-3) : 141 - 155
  • [2] Generalized modeling of empirical social-ecological systems
    Lade, Steven J.
    Niiranen, Susa
    [J]. NATURAL RESOURCE MODELING, 2017, 30 (03)
  • [3] Modeling Social-Ecological Scenarios in Marine Systems
    Osterblom, Henrik
    Merrie, Andrew
    Metian, Marc
    Boonstra, Wiebren J.
    Blenckner, Thorsten
    Watson, James R.
    Rykaczewski, Ryan R.
    Ota, Yoshitaka
    Sarmiento, Jorge L.
    Christensen, Villy
    Schluter, Maja
    Birnbaum, Simon
    Gustafsson, Bo G.
    Humborg, Christoph
    Morth, Carl-Magnus
    Muller-Karulis, Barbel
    Tomczak, Maciej T.
    Troell, Max
    Folke, Carl
    [J]. BIOSCIENCE, 2013, 63 (09) : 735 - 744
  • [4] Understanding social-ecological systems using social media data
    Manley, Kyle
    [J]. NATURE REVIEWS EARTH & ENVIRONMENT, 2022, 3 (08) : 497 - 497
  • [5] The social structural foundations of adaptation and transformation in social-ecological systems
    Barnes, Michele L.
    Bodin, Orjan
    Guerrero, Angela M.
    McAllister, Ryan R. J.
    Alexander, Steven M.
    Robins, Garry
    [J]. ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY, 2017, 22 (04):
  • [6] Social-ecological systems as complex adaptive systems: modeling and policy implications
    Levin, Simon
    Xepapadeas, Tasos
    Crepin, Anne-Sophie
    Norberg, Jon
    De Zeeuw, Aart
    Folke, Carl
    Hughes, Terry
    Arrow, Kenneth
    Barrett, Scott
    Daily, Gretchen
    Ehrlich, Paul
    Kautsky, Nils
    Maler, Karl-Goran
    Polasky, Steve
    Troell, Max
    Vincent, Jeffrey R.
    Walker, Brian
    [J]. ENVIRONMENT AND DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS, 2013, 18 (02) : 111 - 132
  • [7] Understanding large social-ecological systems: introducing the SESMAD project
    Cox, Michael
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE COMMONS, 2014, 8 (02): : 265 - 276
  • [8] Advances in understanding the evolution of institutions in complex social-ecological systems
    Epstein, Graham
    Morrison, Tiffany H.
    Lien, Aaron
    Gurney, Georgina G.
    Cole, Daniel H.
    Delaroche, Martin
    Tomas, Sergio Villamayor
    Ban, Natalie
    Cox, Michael
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 44 : 58 - 66
  • [9] The study of human values in understanding and managing social-ecological systems
    Jones, Natalie A.
    Shaw, Sylvie
    Ross, Helen
    Witt, Katherine
    Pinner, Breanna
    [J]. ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY, 2016, 21 (01):
  • [10] New Directions for Understanding the Spatial Resilience of Social-Ecological Systems
    Cumming, Graeme S.
    Morrison, Tiffany H.
    Hughes, Terence P.
    [J]. ECOSYSTEMS, 2017, 20 (04) : 649 - 664