Optimal sensor placement methodology of triaxial accelerometers using combined metaheuristic algorithms for structural health monitoring applications

被引:8
|
作者
Mghazli, Mohamed Oualid [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Zoubir, Zineb [1 ,4 ]
Nait-Taour, Abdellah [1 ]
Cherif, Seifeddine [5 ]
Lamdouar, Nouzha [3 ]
El Mankibi, Mohamed [2 ]
机构
[1] Green Energy Pk, UM6P, IRESEN, km2 R206, Benguerir, Morocco
[2] Univ Lyon, ENTPE, LTDS, UMR CNRS 5513, Vaulx en Velin, France
[3] Mohammed V Univ Rabat, Mohammadia Sch Engineers, Civil Engn Lab, Rabat, Morocco
[4] Mohammed VI Polytech Univ Morocco, Sch Ind Management, EMINES, Ben Guerir, Morocco
[5] Cadi Ayyad Univ, Fac Sci & Technol, Geoenvironm & Civil Engn Lab L3G, Georessources, Marrakech 40000, Morocco
关键词
Optimal sensor placement; Metaheuristic algorithms; Combinatorial optimization; Structural health monitoring; High rise buildings; OPTIMIZATION; CONFIGURATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.istruc.2023.03.093
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Structural health monitoring applications present a valuable opportunity for cities to improve their in-frastructures environmental life cycle, reduce operational maintenance cost and enhance their resiliency through early damage detection capabilities. The dilemma with structural health monitoring resides in balancing between the number of sensors to be installed and the amount of data that needs to be transferred, stored, and managed. These technical complications directly impact the cost efficiency of such solutions. Thus, limiting the wide range deployment of such technology. Henceforth, Optimal Sensor Placement (OSP) methodologies offers the possi-bility to optimize the sensor configuration that will ensure a proper and cost-efficient monitoring system to obtain the maximum modal information related to any infrastructure type.In this study, a novel "Modal Assurance Criterion (MAC)"-based methodology with the aim of the optimal sensor placement is presented using a 410 m high rise structure. The Modal Kinetic Energy (MKE) and a MAC -based objective function are combined in the suggested methodology. The optimization problem is solved using a new hybrid metaheuristic algorithm that combines Teaching-Learning-Based Optimization (TLBO), Artificial Bee Colonies (ABC), and Stochastic Paint Optimizer (SPO). With no user-defined parameters, the combination of algorithms exhibits up to 86% better fitness, avoids local optimums due to higher accuracy, and shows promising results for cost calculation optimization because it requires 50% to 70% fewer iterations compared to six evolutionary algorithms that are usually used.
引用
收藏
页码:1959 / 1971
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Research on Optimal Sensor Placement Based on Reverberation Matrix for Structural Health Monitoring
    Yang, Hai-feng
    Wu, Zi-yan
    Liu, Shu-kui
    Sun, Hong-bin
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DISTRIBUTED SENSOR NETWORKS, 2012,
  • [32] Optimal sensor placement for structural health monitoring based on multiple optimization strategies
    Yi, Ting-Hua
    Li, Hong-Nan
    Gu, Ming
    STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF TALL AND SPECIAL BUILDINGS, 2011, 20 (07): : 881 - 900
  • [33] Sensor Placement Optimization for Structural Health Monitoring
    Song, Yu
    Cui, Xuepeng
    Hai, Jin
    Wang, Jianxin
    APPLIED ELECTROMAGNETICS AND MECHANICS (II), 2009, 13 : 327 - +
  • [34] Sensor Placement Optimization for Structural Health Monitoring
    Malings, Carl
    Pozzi, Matteo
    Velibeyoglu, Irem
    STRUCTURAL HEALTH MONITORING 2015: SYSTEM RELIABILITY FOR VERIFICATION AND IMPLEMENTATION, VOLS. 1 AND 2, 2015, : 2423 - 2430
  • [35] Optimal placement of sensors for structural health monitoring
    Liu, P.
    Liu, H. J.
    Teng, J.
    Cao, T. Y.
    STRUCTURAL HEALTH MONITORING AND INTELLIGENT INFRASTRUCTURE, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2006, : 985 - 989
  • [36] Optimal sensor placement for monitoring structural vulnerable scenarios
    State Key Laboratory for Disaster Reduction in Civil Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai
    200092, China
    Tongji Daxue Xuebao, 11 (1670-1676 and 1683):
  • [37] Optimal sensor placement methodology for parametric identification of structural systems
    Papadimitriou, C
    JOURNAL OF SOUND AND VIBRATION, 2004, 278 (4-5) : 923 - 947
  • [38] Influences of Sensor Placement Site and Subject Posture on Measurement of Respiratory Frequency Using Triaxial Accelerometers
    Hughes, Stephen
    Liu, Haipeng
    Zheng, Dingchang
    FRONTIERS IN PHYSIOLOGY, 2020, 11
  • [39] On Optimal Sensor Placement Criterion for Structural Health Monitoring with Representative Least Squares Method
    Li, Dong-Sheng
    Li, Hong-Nan
    Fritzen, Claus-Peter
    DAMAGE ASSESSMENT OF STRUCTURES VIII, 2009, 413-414 : 383 - +
  • [40] A Bayesian approach to optimal sensor placement for structural health monitoring with application to active sensing
    Flynn, Eric B.
    Todd, Michael D.
    MECHANICAL SYSTEMS AND SIGNAL PROCESSING, 2010, 24 (04) : 891 - 903