Theorizing how interventions work in evaluation: Process-tracing methods and theorizing process theories of change

被引:2
|
作者
Camacho Garland, Gabriela [1 ,3 ]
Beach, Derek [2 ]
机构
[1] Aarhus Univ, Aarhus, Denmark
[2] Univ Aarhus, Polit Sci, Aarhus, Denmark
[3] Aarhus Univ, Dept Polit Sci, Bartholins Alle 7,Bldg 1331,317, DK-8000 Aarhus, Denmark
关键词
causal linkages; process theory of change; process tracing; theory-based evaluation; theory of change;
D O I
10.1177/13563890231201876
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
This article argues for the importance of theory and theorizing for an evaluation in the form of a process theory of change. A process theory of change centers its theoretical attention on key episodes that explain how things worked, in which the causal linkages are unpacked. The key lies in answering why actors do what they do (and thus whether these actions can be traced back to the intervention). This theorization has three steps: (1) definition of intervention and potential contribution; (2) theorization of potential contribution pathways; and (3) unpacking the process. This procedure is illustrated with a hypothetical example.
引用
收藏
页码:390 / 409
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Impacts of two behavior change interventions on determinants of medication adherence: process evaluation applying the health action process approach and habit theory alongside a randomized controlled trial
    Nicola McCleary
    Noah M. Ivers
    J-D Schwalm
    Holly O. Witteman
    Monica Taljaard
    Laura Desveaux
    Zachary Bouck
    Sherry L. Grace
    Jeremy M. Grimshaw
    Justin Presseau
    Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 2022, 45 : 659 - 673
  • [32] Impacts of two behavior change interventions on determinants of medication adherence: process evaluation applying the health action process approach and habit theory alongside a randomized controlled trial
    McCleary, Nicola
    Ivers, Noah M.
    Schwalm, J-d
    Witteman, Holly O.
    Taljaard, Monica
    Desveaux, Laura
    Bouck, Zachary
    Grace, Sherry L.
    Grimshaw, Jeremy M.
    Presseau, Justin
    JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE, 2022, 45 (05) : 659 - 673
  • [33] Process evaluation of a cluster randomized trial of tailored interventions to implement guidelines in primary care -: why is it so hard to change practice?
    Flottorp, S
    Håvelsrud, K
    Oxman, AD
    FAMILY PRACTICE, 2003, 20 (03) : 333 - 339
  • [34] Co-designing organisational improvements and interventions to increase inpatient activity in four stroke units in England: a mixed-methods process evaluation using normalisation process theory
    Clarke, David
    Gombert-Waldron, Karolina
    Honey, Stephanie
    Cloud, Geoffrey
    Harris, Ruth
    Macdonald, Alastair
    McKevitt, Christopher
    Robert, Glenn
    Jones, Fiona
    BMJ OPEN, 2021, 11 (01):
  • [35] Helping women transition out of sex work: study protocol of a mixed-methods process and outcome evaluation of a sex work exiting program
    Shareck, Martine
    Buhariwala, Pearl
    Hassan, Maha
    O'Campo, Patricia
    BMC WOMENS HEALTH, 2020, 20 (01)
  • [36] Helping women transition out of sex work: study protocol of a mixed-methods process and outcome evaluation of a sex work exiting program
    Martine Shareck
    Pearl Buhariwala
    Maha Hassan
    Patricia O’Campo
    BMC Women's Health, 20
  • [37] Economic development, cargo handling methods and labour process change: the place of the Vietnamese dock worker in the 'global' history of dock work
    Taylor, Greig
    Nguyen, Thanh-Thuy
    Mathew, Sagi K.
    Nguyen, Lan Thi
    LABOR HISTORY, 2021, 62 (01) : 41 - 58
  • [38] Mixed-methods process evaluation of the Dynamic Work study: A multicomponent intervention for office workers to reduce sitting time
    Jelsma, Judith G. M.
    van der Ploeg, Hidde P.
    Renaud, Lidewij R.
    Stijnman, Dominique P. M.
    Loyen, Anne
    Huysmans, Maaike A.
    van der Beek, Allard J.
    van Nassau, Femke
    APPLIED ERGONOMICS, 2022, 104
  • [39] Reducing Physical Risk Factors in Construction Work Through a Participatory Intervention: Protocol for a Mixed-Methods Process Evaluation
    Ajslev, Jeppe
    Brandt, Mikkel
    Moller, Jeppe Lykke
    Skals, Sebastian
    Vinstrup, Jonas
    Jakobsen, Markus Due
    Sundstrup, Emil
    Madeleine, Pascal
    Andersen, Lars Louis
    JMIR RESEARCH PROTOCOLS, 2016, 5 (02):
  • [40] A Mixed-Methods Process Evaluation of the Maastricht Work-Related Support Intervention for Healthcare Professionals in Clinical Care
    Butink, Maarten
    Boonen, Annelies
    Boymans, Tim
    Baadjou, Vera
    Hazelzet, Emmelie
    de Rijk, Angelique
    JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL REHABILITATION, 2024,