Theorizing how interventions work in evaluation: Process-tracing methods and theorizing process theories of change

被引:2
|
作者
Camacho Garland, Gabriela [1 ,3 ]
Beach, Derek [2 ]
机构
[1] Aarhus Univ, Aarhus, Denmark
[2] Univ Aarhus, Polit Sci, Aarhus, Denmark
[3] Aarhus Univ, Dept Polit Sci, Bartholins Alle 7,Bldg 1331,317, DK-8000 Aarhus, Denmark
关键词
causal linkages; process theory of change; process tracing; theory-based evaluation; theory of change;
D O I
10.1177/13563890231201876
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
This article argues for the importance of theory and theorizing for an evaluation in the form of a process theory of change. A process theory of change centers its theoretical attention on key episodes that explain how things worked, in which the causal linkages are unpacked. The key lies in answering why actors do what they do (and thus whether these actions can be traced back to the intervention). This theorization has three steps: (1) definition of intervention and potential contribution; (2) theorization of potential contribution pathways; and (3) unpacking the process. This procedure is illustrated with a hypothetical example.
引用
收藏
页码:390 / 409
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A refined experimentalist governance approach to incremental policy change: the case of process-tracing China's central government infrastructure PPP policies between 1988 and 2017
    Wang, Huanming
    Chen, Bin
    Koppenjan, Joop
    JOURNAL OF CHINESE GOVERNANCE, 2022, 7 (01) : 27 - 51
  • [22] Process evaluation: understanding how the organization's context influences the first step of ergonomic interventions
    Albert, Valerie
    Vezina, Nicole
    Bilodeau, Henriette
    Coutarel, Fabien
    ACTIVITES-REVUE ELECTRONIQUE, 2018, 15 (02):
  • [23] Physical activity in pregnancy: a mixed methods process evaluation of the FitMum randomised controlled trial interventions
    Signe de Place Knudsen
    Caroline Borup Roland
    Saud Abdulaziz Alomairah
    Anne Dsane Jessen
    Stig Molsted
    Tine D. Clausen
    Ellen Løkkegaard
    Bente Stallknecht
    Julie Bønnelycke
    Jane M. Bendix
    Helle Terkildsen Maindal
    BMC Public Health, 22
  • [24] Physical activity in pregnancy: a mixed methods process evaluation of the FitMum randomised controlled trial interventions
    Knudsen, Signe de Place
    Roland, Caroline Borup
    Alomairah, Saud Abdulaziz
    Jessen, Anne Dsane
    Molsted, Stig
    Clausen, Tine D.
    Lokkegaard, Ellen
    Stallknecht, Bente
    Bonnelycke, Julie
    Bendix, Jane M.
    Maindal, Helle Terkildsen
    BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 22 (01)
  • [25] RETurn to work After stroKE (RETAKE) Trial: protocol for a mixed-methods process evaluation using normalisation process theory
    Radford, Kathryn A.
    McKevitt, Christopher
    Clarke, Sara
    Powers, Katie
    Phillips, Julie
    Craven, Kristelle
    Watkins, Caroline
    Farrin, Amanda
    Holmes, Jain
    Cripps, Rachel
    McLellan, Vicki
    Sach, Tracey
    Brindle, Richard
    Holloway, Ivana
    Hartley, Suzanne
    Bowen, Audrey
    O'Connor, Rory J.
    Stevens, Judith
    Walker, Marion
    Murray, John
    Shone, Angela
    Clarke, David
    BMJ OPEN, 2022, 12 (03):
  • [26] Mixed Methods Process Evaluation of a Sanitation Behavior Change Intervention in Rural Odisha, India
    Gloria D. Sclar
    Parimita Routray
    Fiona Majorin
    Shivika Udaipuria
    Gerard Portela
    William J. Koehne
    Corey L. Nagel
    Steven Sola
    Bethany A. Caruso
    Global Implementation Research and Applications, 2022, 2 (1): : 67 - 84
  • [27] How to Perform a Preplanned Process Evaluation for Complex Interventions in Geriatric Medicine: Exemplified With the Process Evaluation of a Complex Falls-Prevention Program for Community-Dwelling Frail Older Fallers
    Reelick, Miriam F.
    Faes, Miriam C.
    Esselink, Rianne A. J.
    Kessels, Roy P. C.
    Rikkert, Marcel G. M. Olde
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL DIRECTORS ASSOCIATION, 2011, 12 (05) : 331 - 336
  • [28] How the Plants for Joints multidisciplinary lifestyle intervention achieved its effects: a mixed methods process evaluation
    Wagenaar, Carlijn A.
    Toonstra, Alie
    Walrabenstein, Wendy
    van Schaardenburg, Dirkjan
    van Nassau, Femke
    BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2024, 24 (01)
  • [29] Process evaluation of motivational interviewing interventions for behaviour change in health: A scoping review (vol 47, pg 315, 2021)
    Rimayanti, M.
    O'Halloran, P.
    Shields, N.
    Morris, R.
    Taylor, N.
    JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND MEDICINE IN SPORT, 2022, 25 (03) : E10 - E10
  • [30] Knowledge translation interventions to sustain direct care provider behaviour change in long-term care: A process evaluation
    Slaughter, Susan E.
    Bampton, Erin
    Erin, Daniel F.
    Ickert, Carla
    Wagg, Adrian S.
    Jones, C. Allyson
    Schalm, Corinne
    Estabrooks, Carole A.
    JOURNAL OF EVALUATION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2018, 24 (01) : 159 - 165