Decision Aids for Decision Making about Locally Advance Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review

被引:2
|
作者
Maes-Carballo, Marta [1 ,2 ,3 ,9 ]
Martin-Diaz, Manuel [4 ]
Garcia-Garcia, Manuel [1 ,5 ]
Reinoso-Hermida, Ayla [1 ]
Mignini, Luciano [5 ]
Teixeira-Arcaya, Rebeca Patricia [6 ]
Khan, Khalid Saeed [3 ,7 ]
Bueno-Cavanillas, Aurora [3 ,7 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Complexo Hosp Ourense, Dept Gen Surg, Breast Canc Unit, Orense, Spain
[2] Hosp Publ Verin, Dept Gen Surg, Orense, Spain
[3] Univ Granada, Dept Prevent Med & Publ Hlth, Granada, Spain
[4] Hosp Santa Ana Motril, Dept Gen Surg, Granada, Spain
[5] Unidad Mastol Grp Orono, Dept Cirugia Gen, Rosario, Argentina
[6] Univ Santiago Compostela, Dept Gen Surg, Santiago, Spain
[7] CIBER Epidemiol & Publ Hlth CIBERESP, Madrid, Spain
[8] Inst Invest Biosanit IBS, Granada, Spain
[9] Dept Gen Surg, Calle Ramon Puga Noguerol, 54, Orense 32005, Spain
关键词
Shared decision making; decision aid; decision support tools; breast cancer; breast cancer treatment; locally advanced cancer; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; ADJUVANT THERAPY; MANAGEMENT; MODEL;
D O I
10.1080/07357907.2023.2164895
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) is a subset of breast cancer with locoregional progression without distant metastasis. The multimodality treatment (surgery, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, hormonal and targeted therapy if required) could significantly improve results in this specific group of patients. The complex and multiple options of treatment with similar mortality rates but different outcomes depending on the patient's desires, preferences and social environment require aid to facilitate the individual patient's decisions (e.g. Decision Aids (DAs) targeting patients considering primary or adjuvant treatment in LABC). In this context, DAs have been proven fundamental to help patients and clinicians share and agree on the best value option. The current systematic review aimed to evaluate the existing DAs related to these patients with LABC and identify current status and possible improvement areas (possible scarcity and heterogeneity of instruments, the status of their development, explanation of their purpose, horizontal ellipsis ). No previous systematic reviews have been published on this topic. Following Prospero registration no: CRD42021286173, studies about LABC DAs were identified, without data or language restrictions, through a systematic search of bibliographic databases in December 2021. Quality was assessed using Qualsyst criteria (range 0.0-1.0). The quality of the 17 selected studies ranged from 0.46 to 0.95. Of them, 14/17 (82%) were DAs about treatment, only one (6%) about diagnosis, and 2/17 (12%) about the employment of DAs. No screening or follow-up DAs were retrieved. Twelve (70.6%) DAs were online tools. They varied broadly regarding their characteristics and purposes. Most of the studies focused on developing and testing different DAs (5/17; 29.4%) and their impact (7/17; 41.2%). Only 4/17 (23.5%) analysed their implementation and cost. These instruments have proven to improve patient's knowledge and decision-making, decrease patient anxiety, and patients tend to undergo treatment. However, nowadays, there is still a need for further research and consensus on methodology to develop practical DAs.
引用
收藏
页码:292 / 304
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A systematic review of decision aids for patients making a decision about treatment for early breast cancer
    Zdenkowski, Nicholas
    Butow, Phyllis
    Tesson, Stephanie
    Boyle, Frances
    BREAST, 2016, 26 : 31 - 45
  • [2] Advance Decision Making in Bipolar: A Systematic Review
    Stephenson, Lucy A.
    Gergel, Tania
    Gieselmann, Astrid
    Scholten, Matthe
    Keene, Alex Ruck
    Rifkin, Larry
    Owen, Gareth
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHIATRY, 2020, 11
  • [3] Assessing the effectiveness of decision aids for decision making in prostate cancer testing: a systematic review
    Ilic, Dragan
    Jammal, Walid
    Chiarelli, Pauline
    Gardiner, Robert A.
    Hughes, Suzanne
    Stefanovic, Dana
    Chambers, Suzanne K.
    PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY, 2015, 24 (10) : 1303 - 1315
  • [4] Decision aids and risk prediction models to support decision making about DCIS treatment: A systematic literature review
    Schmitz, Renee S. J. M.
    Wilthagen, Erica
    van Duijnhoven, Frederieke
    van Oirsouw, Marja
    Verschuur, Ellen
    Lynch, Thomas
    Punglia, Rinaa S.
    Hwang, Shelley
    Wesseling, Jelle
    Schmidt, Marjanka K.
    Bleiker, Eveline
    Engelhardt, Ellen G.
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2022, 82 (04)
  • [5] Assessment of the effects of decision aids about breast cancer screening: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Martinez-Alonso, Montserrat
    Carles-Lavila, Misericordia
    Jose Perez-Lacasta, Maria
    Pons-Rodriguez, Anna
    Garcia, Montse
    Rue, Montserrat
    BMJ OPEN, 2017, 7 (10):
  • [6] Decision aids to support decision-making in dementia care: a systematic review
    Davies, Nathan
    Schiowitz, Brooke
    Rait, Greta
    Vickerstaff, Victoria
    Sampson, Elizabeth L.
    INTERNATIONAL PSYCHOGERIATRICS, 2019, 31 (10) : 1403 - 1419
  • [7] Computerized Decision Aids for Shared Decision Making in Serious Illness: Systematic Review
    Staszewska, Anna
    Zaki, Pearl
    Lee, Joon
    JMIR MEDICAL INFORMATICS, 2017, 5 (04)
  • [8] Decision aids for promoting shared decision-making: A review of systematic reviews
    Park, Myonghwa
    Doan, Thao Thi-Thu
    Jung, Jihye
    Giap, Thi-Thanh-Tinh
    Kim, Jinju
    NURSING & HEALTH SCIENCES, 2024, 26 (01)
  • [9] Use of decision aids for shared decision making in venous thromboembolism: A systematic review
    Barnes, Geoffrey D.
    Izzo, Brett
    Conte, Marisa L.
    Chopra, Vineet
    Holbrook, Anne
    Fagerlin, Angela
    THROMBOSIS RESEARCH, 2016, 143 : 71 - 75
  • [10] Feasibility and Efficacy of Decision Aids to Improve Decision Making for Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Berlin, Nicholas L.
    Tandon, Vickram J.
    Hawley, Sarah T.
    Hamill, Jennifer B.
    MacEachern, Mark P.
    Lee, Clara N.
    Wilkins, Edwin G.
    MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2019, 39 (01) : 5 - 20