Decision aids to support decision-making in dementia care: a systematic review

被引:44
|
作者
Davies, Nathan [1 ,2 ]
Schiowitz, Brooke [1 ]
Rait, Greta [3 ]
Vickerstaff, Victoria [2 ]
Sampson, Elizabeth L. [2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] UCL, Ctr Ageing Populat Studies, Res Dept Primary Care & Populat Hlth, Rowland Hill St, London NW3 2PF, England
[2] UCL, Ctr Dementia Palliat Care Res, Marie Curie Palliat Care Res Dept, Div Psychiat, Tottenham Court Rd, London W1T 7NF, England
[3] UCL, Res Dept Primary Care & Populat Hlth, Priment Clin Trials Unit, London, England
[4] North Middlesex Univ Hosp, Barnet Enfield & Haringey Mental Hlth Trust Liais, Sterling Way, London, England
关键词
Alzheimer's disease; decision-making; decision aid; decision support tool; FEEDING OPTIONS; PEOPLE; LIFE; END; INTERVENTION; PATIENT; DELPHI; GOALS;
D O I
10.1017/S1041610219000826
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Objectives: We aimed to critically evaluate decision aids developed for practitioners and caregivers when providing care for someone with dementia or for use by people with dementia themselves. Decision aids may be videos, booklets, or web-based tools that explicitly state the decision, provide information about the decision, and summarize options along with associated benefits and harms. This helps guide the decision maker through clarifying the values they place on the benefits or harms of the options. Design: We conducted a systematic review of peer-reviewed literature in electronic databases (CINAHL, The Cochrane Library, EMBASE, MEDLINE, and PsychINFO) in March 2018. Reference lists were searched for relevant papers and citations tracked. Data were synthesized with meta-analysis and narrative synthesis. Papers were included if they met the following criteria: 1) the focus of the paper was on the evaluation of a decision aid; 2) the decision aid was used in dementia care; and 3) the decision aid was aimed at professionals, people with dementia, or caregivers. Results: We identified 3618 studies, and 10 studies were included, covering three topics across six decision aids: 1) support with eating/feeding options, 2) place of care, and 3) goals of care. The mode of delivery and format of the decision aids varied and included paper-based, video-based, and audio-based decision aids. The decision aids were shown to be effective, increasing knowledge and the quality of communication. The meta-analysis demonstrated that decisions are effective in reducing decisional conflict among caregivers (standardized mean difference = -0.50, 95% confidence interval [ - 0.97, - 0.02]). Conclusion: Decision aids offer a promising approach for providing support for decision-making in dementia care. People are often faced with more than one decision, and decisions are often interrelated. The decision aids identified in this review focus on single topics. There is a need for decision aids that cover multiple topics in one aid to reflect this complexity and better support caregivers.
引用
收藏
页码:1403 / 1419
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Decision aids to improve informed decision-making in pregnancy care: a systematic review
    Vlemmix, F.
    Warendorf, J. K.
    Rosman, A. N.
    Kok, M.
    Mol, B. W. J.
    Morris, J. M.
    Nassar, N.
    [J]. BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2013, 120 (03) : 257 - 266
  • [2] The efficacy of decision aids to support shared decision-making in haemato-oncology: A systematic review
    Quinn, Sandra
    Copeland, Rachel
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF HAEMATOLOGY, 2023, 201 : 95 - 95
  • [3] Decision aids for promoting shared decision-making: A review of systematic reviews
    Park, Myonghwa
    Doan, Thao Thi-Thu
    Jung, Jihye
    Giap, Thi-Thanh-Tinh
    Kim, Jinju
    [J]. NURSING & HEALTH SCIENCES, 2024, 26 (01)
  • [4] Clinical decision support for therapeutic decision-making in cancer: A systematic review
    Beauchemin, Melissa
    Murray, Meghan T.
    Sung, Lillian
    Hershman, Dawn L.
    Weng, Chunhua
    Schnall, Rebecca
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INFORMATICS, 2019, 130
  • [5] Multicriteria Decision-Making in Diabetes Management and Decision Support: Systematic Review
    Aldaghi, Tahmineh
    Muzik, Jan
    [J]. JMIR MEDICAL INFORMATICS, 2024, 12
  • [6] Decision Aids for Shared Decision-making in Uro-oncology: A Systematic Review
    Gruene, Britta
    Kriegmair, Maximilian C.
    Lenhart, Maximilian
    Michel, Maurice S.
    Huber, Johannes
    Koether, Anja K.
    Buedenbender, Bjorn
    Alpers, Georg W.
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY FOCUS, 2022, 8 (03): : 851 - 869
  • [7] Implementation of eHealth to Support Assessment and Decision-making for Residents With Dementia in Long-term Care: Systematic Review
    Gillam, Juliet
    Davies, Nathan
    Aworinde, Jesutofunmi
    Yorganci, Emel
    Anderson, Janet E.
    Evans, Catherine
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2022, 24 (02)
  • [8] Interventions to facilitate shared decision-making using decision aids with patients in Primary Health Care A systematic review
    Coronado-Vazquez, Valle
    Canet-Fajas, Carlota
    Teresa Delgado-Marroquin, Maria
    Magallon-Botaya, Rosa
    Romero-Martin, Macarena
    Gomez-Salgado, Juan
    [J]. MEDICINE, 2020, 99 (32) : E21389
  • [9] Dental decision-making for persons with dementia: A systematic narrative review
    Matsuda, Shinpei
    Yoshimura, Hitoshi
    [J]. MEDICINE, 2024, 103 (03) : E36555
  • [10] The nature of decision-making in people living with dementia: a systematic review
    Bhatt, Jem
    Walton, Holly
    Stoner, Charlotte R.
    Scior, Katrina
    Charlesworth, Georgina
    [J]. AGING & MENTAL HEALTH, 2020, 24 (03) : 363 - 373