Computerized Decision Aids for Shared Decision Making in Serious Illness: Systematic Review

被引:16
|
作者
Staszewska, Anna [1 ]
Zaki, Pearl [1 ]
Lee, Joon [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Waterloo, Sch Publ Hlth & Hlth Syst, Hlth Data Sci Lab, 200 Univ Ave W, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
decision making; decision aids; evidence-based medicine; user-computer interface; chronic disease; CHEMOTHERAPY; INFORMATION; SUPPORT; CARE;
D O I
10.2196/medinform.6405
中图分类号
R-058 [];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Shared decision making (SDM) is important in achieving patient-centered care. SDM tools such as decision aids are intended to inform the patient. When used to assist in decision making between treatments, decision aids have been shown to reduce decisional conflict, increase ease of decision making, and increase modification of previous decisions. Objective: The purpose of this systematic review is to assess the impact of computerized decision aids on patient-centered outcomes related to SDM for seriously ill patients. Methods: PubMed and Scopus databases were searched to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that assessed the impact of computerized decision aids on patient-centered outcomes and SDM in serious illness. Six RCTs were identified and data were extracted on study population, design, and results. Risk of bias was assessed by a modified Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool for Quality Assessment of Randomized Controlled Trials. Results: Six RCTs tested decision tools in varying serious illnesses. Three studies compared different computerized decision aids against each other and a control. All but one study demonstrated improvement in at least one patient-centered outcome. Computerized decision tools may reduce unnecessary treatment in patients with low disease severity in comparison with informational pamphlets. Additionally, electronic health record (EHR) portals may provide the opportunity to manage care from the home for individuals affected by illness. The quality of decision aids is of great importance. Furthermore, satisfaction with the use of tools is associated with increased patient satisfaction and reduced decisional conflict. Finally, patients may benefit from computerized decision tools without the need for increased physician involvement. Conclusions: Most computerized decision aids improved at least one patient-centered outcome. All RCTs identified were at a High Risk of Bias or Unclear Risk of Bias. Effort should be made to improve the quality of RCTs testing SDM aids in serious illness.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Tools to Promote Shared Decision Making in Serious Illness A Systematic Review
    Austin, C. Adrian
    Mohottige, Dinushika
    Sudore, Rebecca L.
    Smith, Alexander K.
    Hanson, Laura C.
    [J]. JAMA INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2015, 175 (07) : 1213 - 1221
  • [2] Shared Decision Making and Serious Mental Illness
    Mahone, Irma H.
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF PSYCHIATRIC NURSING, 2008, 22 (06) : 334 - 343
  • [3] Use of decision aids for shared decision making in venous thromboembolism: A systematic review
    Barnes, Geoffrey D.
    Izzo, Brett
    Conte, Marisa L.
    Chopra, Vineet
    Holbrook, Anne
    Fagerlin, Angela
    [J]. THROMBOSIS RESEARCH, 2016, 143 : 71 - 75
  • [4] Decision aids for promoting shared decision-making: A review of systematic reviews
    Park, Myonghwa
    Doan, Thao Thi-Thu
    Jung, Jihye
    Giap, Thi-Thanh-Tinh
    Kim, Jinju
    [J]. NURSING & HEALTH SCIENCES, 2024, 26 (01)
  • [5] Decision Aids for Shared Decision-making in Uro-oncology: A Systematic Review
    Gruene, Britta
    Kriegmair, Maximilian C.
    Lenhart, Maximilian
    Michel, Maurice S.
    Huber, Johannes
    Koether, Anja K.
    Buedenbender, Bjorn
    Alpers, Georg W.
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY FOCUS, 2022, 8 (03): : 851 - 869
  • [6] Decision aids that facilitate elements of shared decision making in chronic illnesses: a systematic review
    Wieringa, Thomas H.
    Rodriguez-Gutierrez, Rene
    Spencer-Bonilla, Gabriela
    de Wit, Maartje
    Ponce, Oscar J.
    Sanchez-Herrera, Manuel F.
    Espinoza, Nataly R.
    Zisman-Ilani, Yaara
    Kunneman, Marleen
    Schoonmade, Linda J.
    Montori, Victor M.
    Snoek, Frank J.
    [J]. SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2019, 8 (1)
  • [7] Decision aids that facilitate elements of shared decision making in chronic illnesses: a systematic review
    Thomas H. Wieringa
    Rene Rodriguez-Gutierrez
    Gabriela Spencer-Bonilla
    Maartje de Wit
    Oscar J. Ponce
    Manuel F. Sanchez-Herrera
    Nataly R. Espinoza
    Yaara Zisman-Ilani
    Marleen Kunneman
    Linda J. Schoonmade
    Victor M. Montori
    Frank J. Snoek
    [J]. Systematic Reviews, 8
  • [8] Shared Risk Taking: Shared Decision Making in Serious Mental Illness
    Zisman-Ilani, Yaara
    Lysaker, Paul H.
    Hasson-Ohayon, Ilanit
    [J]. PSYCHIATRIC SERVICES, 2021, 72 (04) : 461 - 463
  • [9] Shared Mind: Communication, Decision Making, and Autonomy in Serious Illness
    Epstein, Ronald M.
    Street, Richard L., Jr.
    [J]. ANNALS OF FAMILY MEDICINE, 2011, 9 (05) : 454 - 461
  • [10] Shared decision -making in serious mental illness: A comparative study
    Huang, Chongmei
    Plummer, Virginia
    Lam, Louisa
    Cross, Wendy
    [J]. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2020, 103 (08) : 1637 - 1644