Life cycle environmental impact assessment of natural gas distributed energy system

被引:2
|
作者
Wang, Yakun [1 ]
Ni, Ting [1 ,2 ]
He, Bing [3 ]
Xu, Jiuping [2 ]
机构
[1] Chengdu Univ Technol, Coll Environm & Civil Engn, Chengdu, Peoples R China
[2] Sichuan Univ, Business Sch, Chengdu 610059, Peoples R China
[3] Second Construct Corp Ltd, China Construct Bur 8, 191 Nanxinzhuang West Rd, Jinan 250024, Shandong, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
POSTCOMBUSTION CARBON CAPTURE; POWER-SYSTEM; FUEL-CELL; OPTIMIZATION; COAL; METHODOLOGY; PERFORMANCE; ELECTRICITY; GENERATION; EMISSIONS;
D O I
10.1038/s41598-024-53495-1
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Natural gas distributed energy is recognized as a pivotal means to enhance energy efficiency and mitigate carbon dioxide emissions through localized energy cascading. Positioned as a key option for advancing the Sustainable Development Goals, this system optimizes energy utilization near end-users. While maximizing energy efficiency, it is imperative to address potential environmental challenges. A thorough, comprehensive environmental assessment, facilitated by the life cycle assessment method, proves instrumental in meeting this standard. Employing this method enables an intuitive grasp of the environmental strengths and weaknesses inherent in natural gas distributed energy within the power structure. This insight serves as a foundation for informed project decision-making, fostering the growth of the industry. We selected six environmental impact assessment categories based on the CML 2001 method, and conducted the life cycle analysis across four stages. China's inaugural natural gas distributed energy demonstration project was chosen as a model case, and an environmental impact assessment inventory was established, utilizing survey data and literature for comprehensive data collection and analysis. Results from case testing yield environmental impact assessment outcomes, with a specific sensitivity analysis for stages with notable environmental impact factors. The study underscores that the operation phase has the highest environmental impact, comprising 78.37% of the total combined environmental impact, followed by the fuel production phase. Comparative analyses with coal-fired and conventional natural gas power generation, based on dimensionless literature data, reveal that abiotic resources depletion potential is the primary contributor to the environmental impact of 1 kWh of electricity product, constituting 52.76% of the total impact value, followed by global warming potential. Concrete strategies have been outlined for decision-making in both the operational and planning phases of natural gas distributed energy projects. The strengthening of policies is pinpointed towards grid connection and scale expansion.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Life cycle environmental impact assessment of the "Sindhuja-I" wave energy converter
    Singh, Devesh
    Paul, Akshoy Ranjan
    Samad, Abdus
    Haque, Nawshad
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS PART M-JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING FOR THE MARITIME ENVIRONMENT, 2024,
  • [32] Life Cycle Assessment for Environmental Impact Reduction and Evaluation of the Energy Indices in Lettuce Production
    Mousavi, Ali
    Aghbolaghi, Ebrahim Asadi
    Khorramifar, Ali
    Gancarz, Marek
    Darvishi, Yousef
    Stasiak, Mateusz
    Miernik, Anna
    Karami, Hamed
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2022, 12 (20):
  • [33] Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of Environmental and Energy Systems
    Ciacci, Luca
    Passarini, Fabrizio
    ENERGIES, 2020, 13 (22)
  • [34] Life cycle environmental impact assessment of a solar heater
    Koroneos, C.
    Drosos, G.
    Roumbas, G.
    Moussiopoulos, N.
    Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Environmental Science and Technology, Vol A, Oral Presentations, 2003, : 508 - 514
  • [35] Life Cycle Assessment of Environmental Impact of Steelmaking Process
    Liu, Huimin
    Li, Qiqiang
    Li, Guanguan
    Ding, Ran
    COMPLEXITY, 2020, 2020
  • [36] Life Cycle Assessment of Power-to-Gas: Approaches, system variations and their environmental implications
    Zhang, Xiaojin
    Bauer, Christian
    Mutel, Christopher L.
    Volkart, Kathrin
    APPLIED ENERGY, 2017, 190 : 326 - 338
  • [37] Three considerations for modeling natural gas system methane emissions in life cycle assessment
    Grubert, Emily A.
    Brandt, Adam R.
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 222 : 760 - 767
  • [38] Life-Cycle Environmental Impact Assessment of Reinforced Concrete Buildings Subjected to Natural Hazards
    Hossain, Kazi Ashfaq
    Gencturk, Bora
    JOURNAL OF ARCHITECTURAL ENGINEERING, 2016, 22 (04)
  • [39] Comparative environmental life cycle assessment of conventional energy storage system and innovative thermal energy storage system
    David B.R.
    Spencer S.
    Miller J.
    Almahmoud S.
    Jouhara H.
    International Journal of Thermofluids, 2021, 12
  • [40] A life cycle analysis of the Canadian natural gas system
    Whittaker, SM
    McGuire, G
    Irwin, T
    Humphreys, K
    ENVIRONMENT CONSCIOUS MATERIALS - ECOMATERIALS, 2000, : 177 - 189