Life cycle environmental impact assessment of natural gas distributed energy system

被引:2
|
作者
Wang, Yakun [1 ]
Ni, Ting [1 ,2 ]
He, Bing [3 ]
Xu, Jiuping [2 ]
机构
[1] Chengdu Univ Technol, Coll Environm & Civil Engn, Chengdu, Peoples R China
[2] Sichuan Univ, Business Sch, Chengdu 610059, Peoples R China
[3] Second Construct Corp Ltd, China Construct Bur 8, 191 Nanxinzhuang West Rd, Jinan 250024, Shandong, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
POSTCOMBUSTION CARBON CAPTURE; POWER-SYSTEM; FUEL-CELL; OPTIMIZATION; COAL; METHODOLOGY; PERFORMANCE; ELECTRICITY; GENERATION; EMISSIONS;
D O I
10.1038/s41598-024-53495-1
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Natural gas distributed energy is recognized as a pivotal means to enhance energy efficiency and mitigate carbon dioxide emissions through localized energy cascading. Positioned as a key option for advancing the Sustainable Development Goals, this system optimizes energy utilization near end-users. While maximizing energy efficiency, it is imperative to address potential environmental challenges. A thorough, comprehensive environmental assessment, facilitated by the life cycle assessment method, proves instrumental in meeting this standard. Employing this method enables an intuitive grasp of the environmental strengths and weaknesses inherent in natural gas distributed energy within the power structure. This insight serves as a foundation for informed project decision-making, fostering the growth of the industry. We selected six environmental impact assessment categories based on the CML 2001 method, and conducted the life cycle analysis across four stages. China's inaugural natural gas distributed energy demonstration project was chosen as a model case, and an environmental impact assessment inventory was established, utilizing survey data and literature for comprehensive data collection and analysis. Results from case testing yield environmental impact assessment outcomes, with a specific sensitivity analysis for stages with notable environmental impact factors. The study underscores that the operation phase has the highest environmental impact, comprising 78.37% of the total combined environmental impact, followed by the fuel production phase. Comparative analyses with coal-fired and conventional natural gas power generation, based on dimensionless literature data, reveal that abiotic resources depletion potential is the primary contributor to the environmental impact of 1 kWh of electricity product, constituting 52.76% of the total impact value, followed by global warming potential. Concrete strategies have been outlined for decision-making in both the operational and planning phases of natural gas distributed energy projects. The strengthening of policies is pinpointed towards grid connection and scale expansion.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Environmental impact efficiency of natural gas combined cycle power plants: A combined life cycle assessment and dynamic data envelopment analysis approach
    Martin-Gamboa, Mario
    Iribarren, Diego
    Dufour, Javier
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2018, 615 : 29 - 37
  • [22] Life cycle assessment of a food waste composting system: environmental impact hotspots
    Saer, Alex
    Lansing, Stephanie
    Davitt, Nadine H.
    Graves, Robert E.
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2013, 52 : 234 - 244
  • [23] Liquefied natural gas for the UK: a life cycle assessment
    Carla Tagliaferri
    Roland Clift
    Paola Lettieri
    Chris Chapman
    The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2017, 22 : 1944 - 1956
  • [24] Liquefied natural gas for the UK: a life cycle assessment
    Tagliaferri, Carla
    Clift, Roland
    Lettieri, Paola
    Chapman, Chris
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2017, 22 (12): : 1944 - 1956
  • [25] Blending low-carbon hydrogen with natural gas: Impact on energy and life cycle emissions in natural gas pipelines
    Cappello, Vincenzo
    Sun, Pingping
    Elgowainy, Amgad
    GAS SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2024, 128
  • [26] Energy, environmental and economic life cycle assessment of hydrogen source via natural gas steam reforming for fuel cell vehicles
    Feng, W
    Wang, SJ
    Wan, W
    Zheng, XY
    Chen, CH
    Ni, WD
    Xu, XC
    ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2003, : 405 - 410
  • [27] Balance between energy conservation and environmental impact: Life-cycle energy analysis and life-cycle environmental impact analysis
    Hu, Ming
    ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2017, 140 : 131 - 139
  • [28] Life cycle assessment on improvement strategies of environmental sustainability for a liquified natural gas plant in Indonesia
    Benarimo, Sapto
    Lukito, Edi
    Adnan, Muflih Arisa
    Margono, Sunu Herwi
    Pranolo, Sunu Herwi
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2023, 28 (09): : 1142 - 1154
  • [29] Life cycle assessment on improvement strategies of environmental sustainability for a liquified natural gas plant in Indonesia
    Sapto Benarimo
    Edi Lukito
    Muflih Arisa Adnan
    Sunu Herwi Margono
    The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2023, 28 : 1142 - 1154
  • [30] Environmental impact assessment of solar energy systems results from a life cycle analysis
    Gekas, V
    Frantzeskaki, N
    Tsoutsos, T
    PROTECTION AND RESTORATION OF THE ENVIRONMENT VI, VOLS I - III, PROCEEDINGS, 2002, : 1569 - 1575