Comparison of spin-echo echo planar imaging and gradient-recalled echo sequences in magnetic resonance elastography of liver at 1.5T same MRI scanner

被引:0
|
作者
Abe, Ryouna [1 ]
Fukuzawa, Kei [1 ]
Yoshihara, Chiharu [1 ]
Tano, Masakatsu [1 ]
Saitoh, Satoshi [2 ]
机构
[1] Toranomon Gen Hosp, Dept Radiol Technol, 2-2-2 Toranomon,Minato Ku, Tokyo, Japan
[2] Toranomon Gen Hosp, Dept Hepatol, 2-2-2 Toranomon,Minato Ku, Tokyo, Japan
关键词
Liver MRI; GRE MRE; SE-EPI MRE; R2*; Liver stiffness; HEPATIC-FIBROSIS; DISEASE; QUANTIFICATION; MULTIFREQUENCY; PERFORMANCE; STEATOSIS;
D O I
10.1007/s00261-023-04098-3
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose Magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) is used to measure liver stiffness with gradient-recalled echo (GRE)-based and spin-echo echo planar imaging (SE-EPI)-based sequences. We compared the liver stiffness (LS) values of the two sequences on a 1.5-T MR imaging scanner.Methods This is a retrospective study. An MRE imaging section was obtained from a horizontal section of the liver. Region of interest was drawn on the elastogram, and the mean LS and pixel values were measured and compared. The correlations between proton density fat fraction, R2* values, and biochemical data from electronic medical records were confirmed, and multivariate analysis was performed.Results The mean LS values were 3.01 +/- 1.78 kPa for GRE and 3.13 +/- 1.57 kPa for SE-EPI, showing excellent agreement and a strong correlation between the two sequences (correlation coefficient r = 0.96). The mean pixel values were 369.5 +/- 142.7 pixels for GRE and 490.1 +/- 197.9 pixels for SE-EPI, showing a significant difference by the Wilcoxon rank sum test (p < 0.01). There were no LS unmeasurable cases in SE-EPI, but seven (2.5%) were unmeasurable in GRE, and multivariate analysis showed a significant difference with p < 0.001 in R2* values (mean, 92.7 Hz) for the GRE method.Conclusion The GRE and SE-EPI methods were comparable for LS measurements in 1.5-T liver MRE, indicating that SE-EPI MRE is more useful because GRE MRE may not measure cases with high R2* values and the region of interest tends to be smaller.
引用
收藏
页码:694 / 702
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of spin-echo echo planar imaging and gradient-recalled echo sequences in magnetic resonance elastography of liver at 1.5T same MRI scanner
    Ryouna Abe
    Kei Fukuzawa
    Chiharu Yoshihara
    Masakatsu Tano
    Satoshi Saitoh
    Abdominal Radiology, 2024, 49 : 694 - 702
  • [2] Comparison of spin-echo echo-planar imaging magnetic resonance elastography with gradient-recalled echo magnetic resonance elastography and their correlation with transient elastography
    Yoon, Jin Woo
    Lee, Eun Sun
    Park, Hyun Jeong
    Park, Sung Bin
    Cho, Young Youn
    Kannengiesser, Stephan
    Hur, Joonho
    DIAGNOSTIC AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2022, 28 (04) : 294 - 300
  • [3] MR elastography in patients with suspected diffuse liver disease at 1.5T: Intraindividual comparison of gradient-recalled echo versus spin-echo echo-planar imaging sequences and investigation of potential confounding factors
    Plaikner, Michaela
    Kremser, Christian
    Zoller, Heinz
    Kannengiesser, Stephan
    Henninger, Benjamin
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2021, 142
  • [4] Comparison of gradient-recalled echo and spin-echo echo-planar imaging MR elastography in staging liver fibrosis: a meta-analysis
    Yong Seek Kim
    Yu Na Jang
    Ji Soo Song
    European Radiology, 2018, 28 : 1709 - 1718
  • [5] Comparison of gradient-recalled echo and spin-echo echo-planar imaging MR elastography in staging liver fibrosis: a meta-analysis
    Kim, Yong Seek
    Jang, Yu Na
    Song, Ji Soo
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2018, 28 (04) : 1709 - 1718
  • [6] Magnetic Resonance Elastography for the Evaluation of Liver Fibrosis in Chronic Hepatitis B and C by Using Both Gradient-Recalled Echo and Spin-Echo Echo Planar Imaging: A Prospective Study
    Shi, Yu
    Xia, Fei
    Li, Qiu-ju
    Li, Jia-hui
    Yu, Bing
    Li, Yue
    An, He
    Glaser, Kevin J.
    Tao, Shengzhen
    Ehman, Richard L.
    Guo, Qi-yong
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2016, 111 (06): : 823 - 833
  • [7] MR elastography of liver at 3 Tesla: comparison of gradient-recalled echo (GRE) and spin-echo (SE) echo-planar imaging (EPI) sequences and agreement across stiffness measurements
    Chenyang Zhan
    Stephan Kannengiesser
    Hersh Chandarana
    Matthias Fenchel
    Justin Ream
    Krishna Prasad Shanbhogue
    Abdominal Radiology, 2019, 44 : 1825 - 1833
  • [8] MR elastography of liver at 3 Tesla: comparison of gradient-recalled echo (GRE) and spin-echo (SE) echo-planar imaging (EPI) sequences and agreement across stiffness measurements
    Zhan, Chenyang
    Kannengiesser, Stephan
    Chandarana, Hersh
    Fenchel, Matthias
    Ream, Justin
    Shanbhogue, Krishna Prasad
    ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 2019, 44 (05) : 1825 - 1833
  • [9] Comparison of technical failure of MR elastography for measuring liver stiffness between gradient-recalled echo and spin-echo echo-planar imaging: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Kim, Dong Wook
    Kim, So Yeon
    Yoon, Hee Mang
    Kim, Kyung Won
    Byun, Jae Ho
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2020, 51 (04) : 1086 - 1102
  • [10] Magnetic Resonance Elastography of the Liver Qualitative and Quantitative Comparison of Gradient Echo and Spin Echo Echoplanar Imaging Sequences
    Wagner, Mathilde
    Besa, Cecilia
    Ayache, Jad Bou
    Yasar, Temel Kaya
    Bane, Octavia
    Fung, Maggie
    Ehman, Richard L.
    Taouli, Bachir
    INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 2016, 51 (09) : 575 - 581