Scoping Reviews: Expanding Methodological Approaches to Literature Reviews in Adult Education

被引:0
|
作者
Samuel, Anita [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Uniformed Serv Univ Hlth Sci, Ctr Hlth Profess Educ, Sch Med, Bethesda, MD USA
[2] Uniformed Serv Univ Hlth Sci, Ctr Hlth Profess Educ, Sch Med, 4301 Jones Bridge Rd, Bethesda, MD 20814 USA
关键词
literature review; scoping review; knowledge synthesis;
D O I
10.1177/10451595231201346
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Literature reviews map the research landscape in a topic area, identify gaps that new research can address, or frame a future research project. Literature reviews inform research and are integral to developing evidence-based policies. In adult education, systematic, critical, integrative, and historical reviews have been conducted. Scoping reviews, however, have yet to be widely adopted, although they can provide adult educators with a systematic process for reviewing a heterogeneous body of literature in adult education. This article explores why scoping reviews are a good fit for adult education and presents a systematic approach to conducting scoping reviews. The paper presents an expanded nine-step scoping review process that begins with the conception of an idea and ends with writing a manuscript for publication. The article discusses best practices, highlights challenges, and provides suggestions to help adult education researchers avoid common pitfalls when conducting scoping reviews.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Literature reviews in mathematics education and their significance to the field
    Kaiser, Gabriele
    Schukajlow, Stanislaw
    [J]. ZDM-MATHEMATICS EDUCATION, 2024, 56 (01): : 1 - 3
  • [42] Types and roles of reviews of the literature in dental education
    Nevius, Amanda M.
    Stellrecht, Elizabeth M.
    Schvaneveldt, Nena
    Dragan, Irina F.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DENTAL EDUCATION, 2020, 84 (08) : 847 - 851
  • [43] Literature reviews vs systematic reviews
    Robinson, Priscilla
    Lowe, John
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2015, 39 (02) : 103 - 103
  • [44] Reviews of Literature in Nursing Research Methodological Considerations and Defining Characteristics
    Silva, Amina Regina
    Padilha, Maria Itayra
    Petry, Stefany
    Silva, Vanessa Silva E.
    Woo, Kevin
    Galica, Jacqueline
    Wilson, Rosemary
    Luctkar-Flude, Marian
    [J]. ADVANCES IN NURSING SCIENCE, 2022, 45 (03) : 197 - 208
  • [45] POOR METHODOLOGICAL QUALITY OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS PUBLISHED IN THE UROLOGICAL LITERATURE
    Ding, Maylynn
    Johnson, Jared
    Ariel Alvez, Gustavo
    Dahm, Philipp
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2023, 209 : E342 - E342
  • [46] Systematic reviews versus narrative reviews in clinical anatomy: Methodological approaches in the era of evidence-based anatomy
    Henry, Brandon Michael
    Skinningsrud, Bendik
    Vikse, Jens
    Pekala, Przemyslaw A.
    Walocha, Jerzy A.
    Loukas, Marious
    Tubbs, R. Shane
    Tomaszewski, Krzysztof A.
    [J]. CLINICAL ANATOMY, 2018, 31 (03) : 364 - 367
  • [47] Scoping reviews: Their development and application in environmental and sustainable education research
    Gutierrez-Bucheli, Laura
    Reid, Alan
    Kidman, Gillian
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION RESEARCH, 2022, 28 (05) : 645 - 673
  • [48] Scoping Reviews: Mapping New Terrain in Family Medicine Education
    Phillips, Julie P.
    [J]. FAMILY MEDICINE, 2020, 52 (04) : 241 - 242
  • [49] Exploring the world "out there": the use of scoping reviews in education research
    Godfrey, Christina
    [J]. JBI EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS, 2020, 18 (05) : 859 - 860
  • [50] Literature reviews
    Anon
    [J]. Fluid Power Journal, 2002, 9 (01):