High-resolution entry and exit surface dosimetry in a 1.5 T MR-linac

被引:5
|
作者
Patterson, E. [1 ]
Stokes, P. [4 ]
Cutajar, D. [1 ]
Rosenfeld, A. [1 ,2 ]
Baines, J. [4 ,5 ]
Metcalfe, P. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Powers, M. [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wollongong, Ctr Med & Radiat Phys, Wollongong, NSW, Australia
[2] Univ Wollongong, Illawarra Hlth Med Res Inst, Wollongong, NSW, Australia
[3] Ingham Inst Appl Med Res, Liverpool, NSW, Australia
[4] Townsville Hosp, Townsville Canc Ctr, Hlth Serv, Townsville, Qld, Australia
[5] James Cook Univ, Coll Sci & Engn, Townsville, Qld, Australia
关键词
MR-linac; Elekta Unity; MOSFET; Skin dose; Surface dosimetry; Monte Carlo; MV RADIOTHERAPY ACCELERATOR; SKIN DOSE MEASUREMENT; IN-VIVO DOSIMETRY; MAGNETIC-FIELD; MOSKIN DETECTOR; TLD EXTRAPOLATION; SCANNER; BEAM; ORIENTATION; ENTRANCE;
D O I
10.1007/s13246-023-01251-6
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
The magnetic field of a transverse MR-linac alters electron trajectories as the photon beam transits through materials, causing lower doses at flat entry surfaces and increased doses at flat beam-exiting surfaces. This study investigated the response of a MOSFET detector, known as the MOSkin (TM), for high-resolution surface and near-surface percentage depth dose measurements on an Elekta Unity. Simulations with Geant4 and the Monaco treatment planning system (TPS), and EBT-3 film measurements, were also performed for comparison. Measured MOSkin (TM) entry surface doses, relative to D-max, were (9.9 +/- 0.2)%, (10.1 +/- 0.3)%, (11.3 +/- 0.6)%, (12.9 +/- 1.0)%, and (13.4 +/- 1.0)% for 1 x 1 cm(2), 3 x 3 cm(2), 5 x 5 cm(2), 10 x 10 cm(2), and 22 x 22 cm(2) fields, respectively. For the investigated fields, the maximum percent differences of Geant4, TPS, and film doses extrapolated and interpolated to a depth suitable for skin dose assessment at the beam entry, relative to MOSkin (TM) measurements at an equivalent depth were 1.0%, 2.8%, and 14.3%, respectively, and at a WED of 199.67 mm at the beam exit, 3.2%, 3.7% and 5.7%, respectively. The largest measured increase in exit dose, due to the electron return effect, was 15.4% for the 10 x 10 cm(2) field size using the MOSkin (TM) and 17.9% for the 22 x 22 cm(2) field size, using Geant4 calculations. The results presented in the study validate the suitability of the MOSkin (TM) detector for transverse MR-linac surface dosimetry.
引用
收藏
页码:787 / 800
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] High-resolution entry and exit surface dosimetry in a 1.5 T MR-linac
    E. Patterson
    P. Stokes
    D. Cutajar
    A. Rosenfeld
    J. Baines
    P. Metcalfe
    M. Powers
    Physical and Engineering Sciences in Medicine, 2023, 46 : 787 - 800
  • [2] Gated Beam Dosimetry Properties of a 1.5T MR-Linac
    Chen, X.
    Omari, E.
    Tai, A.
    Jassar, H.
    Zhang, Y.
    Paulson, E.
    Ahunbay, E.
    Sandin, C.
    Kydonieos, M.
    Li, X.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2022, 49 (06) : E318 - E318
  • [3] Surface and near-surface dose measurements at beam entry and exit in a 1.5 T MR-Linac using optically stimulated luminescence dosimeters
    Kim, Anthony
    Lim-Reinders, Stephanie
    Ahmad, Syed Bilal
    Sahgal, Arjun
    Keller, Brian M.
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2020, 65 (04):
  • [4] Performance of the HYPERSCINT scintillation dosimetry research platform for the 1.5 T MR-linac
    Uijtewaal, Prescilla
    Cote, Benjamin
    Foppen, Thomas
    de Vries, Wilfred
    Woodings, Simon
    Borman, Pim
    Lambert-Girard, Simon
    Therriault-Proulx, Francois
    Raaymakers, Bas
    Fast, Martin
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2023, 68 (04):
  • [5] Towards Best Practice Guidelines for Reference Dosimetry in a 1.5 T MR-Linac
    Iakovenko, V.
    Keller, B.
    Nusrat, H.
    Sahgal, A.
    Sarfehnia, A.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2020, 47 (06) : E441 - E441
  • [6] The Quality Assurance of a 1.5 T MR-Linac
    Riis, Hans Lynggaard
    Chick, Joan
    Dunlop, Alex
    Tilly, David
    SEMINARS IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2024, 34 (01) : 120 - 128
  • [7] Performance Characterization of a Clinical 1.5 T MR-Linac
    Keller, B.
    Kim, A.
    Iakovenko, V.
    Ruschin, M.
    McCann, C.
    Beachey, D.
    Chugh, B.
    Elzibak, A.
    Sahgal, A.
    Sarfehnia, A.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2020, 47 (06) : E827 - E827
  • [8] Comparison of the Adaptation Algorithms on the 1.5T MR-Linac
    Nachbar, M.
    Moennich, D.
    Marks, C.
    Stolte, A.
    Weidner, N.
    Paulsen, F.
    Dohm, O.
    Mueller, A. -C
    Thorwarth, D.
    Zips, D.
    Gani, C.
    Boeke, S.
    STRAHLENTHERAPIE UND ONKOLOGIE, 2019, 195 : S12 - S12
  • [9] The patient's perspective on radiotherapy on a 1.5 T MR-Linac
    Ehlers, J.
    Gani, C.
    Marks, C.
    Stolte, A.
    Thorwarth, D.
    Weidner, N.
    Mueller, A.
    Moennich, D.
    Nachbar, M.
    Dohm, O.
    Zips, D.
    Boeke, S.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2020, 152 : S688 - S688
  • [10] Compact bunker shielding assessment for 1.5 T MR-Linac
    Sung, Jiwon
    Choi, Yeonho
    Kim, Jun Won
    Lee, Ik Jae
    Lee, Ho
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2022, 12 (01)