Statins for primary prevention in multimorbid patients: to prescribe or not to prescribe? A qualitative analysis of general practitioners' decision-making processes

被引:1
|
作者
Onaisi, Racha [1 ]
Bezzazi, Anais [2 ]
Berthouin, Thomas [2 ]
Boulet, Justine [2 ]
Hasselgard-Rowe, Jennifer [3 ]
Maisonneuve, Hubert [2 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bordeaux, Dept Gen Practice, F-33000 Bordeaux, France
[2] Univ Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Univ Coll Gen Med, Lyon, France
[3] Univ Geneva, Inst Global Hlth, Fac Med, Geneva, Switzerland
[4] Univ Geneva, Univ Inst Primary Care, Fac Med, Geneva, Switzerland
[5] Univ Geneva, Univ Inst Primary Care, Fac Med, Rue Michel Servet 1, CH-1211 Geneva 4, Switzerland
关键词
cardiovascular prevention; clinical reasoning; decision aid; decision making; shared decision making; statin; FRAMEWORK;
D O I
10.1093/fampra/cmad068
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Introduction A better understanding of the determinants involved in general practitioners' (GPs) decision-making processes when it comes to prescribing statins as primary prevention in patients with multimorbidity could provide insights for improving implementation of primary prevention guidelines. Methods We conducted a qualitative study using a deductive framework-based and inductive analysis of GPs' semi-structured interviews verbatim, from which expertise profiles of prescribers were also drawn. The analytical framework was built from a pragmatic synthesis of the evidence-based medicine, Modelling using Typified Objects (MOT) model of clinical reasoning processes, Theoretical Domains Framework, and shared decision-making frameworks. Results Fifteen GPs were interviewed between June 2019 and January 2020. Diabetes seemed to represent a specific motivation for deciding about statin prescription for primary prevention purposes; and in situations of multimorbidity, GPs differentiated between cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular multimorbidity. Expert prescribers seemed to have integrated the utilisation of cardiovascular risk calculation scores throughout their practice, whereas non-expert prescribers considered them difficult to interpret and preferred using more of a "rule of thumb" process. One interviewee used the risk calculation score as a support for discussing statin prescription with the patient. Conclusion Our results shed light on the reasons why statins remain under-prescribed for primary prevention and why non-diabetic multimorbid patients have even lower odds of being prescribed a statin. They call for a change in the use of risk assessment scores, by placing them as decision aids, to support and improve personalised shared decision-making discussions as an efficient approach to improve the implementation of recommendations about statins for primary prevention.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Decision-making regarding subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator as primary prevention in patients with low ejection fraction
    Ngan, Ho-Ting
    Li, Ka-Ying
    Wong, Shing-Lung
    Tse, Hung-Fat
    [J]. PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2024,
  • [42] Why do patients transition between orthodontic appliances? A qualitative analysis of patient decision-making
    Alansari, Reem
    Vaiid, Nikhillesh
    [J]. ORTHODONTICS & CRANIOFACIAL RESEARCH, 2024, 27 (03) : 439 - 446
  • [43] Patients' understanding of risk: a qualitative study of decision-making about the menopause and hormone replacement therapy in general practice
    Walter, FM
    Britten, N
    [J]. FAMILY PRACTICE, 2002, 19 (06) : 579 - 586
  • [44] Decision-making Processes among Prostate Cancer Survivors with Rising PSA Levels: Results from a Qualitative Analysis
    Shen, Megan Johnson
    Nelson, Christian J.
    Peters, Ellen
    Slovin, Susan F.
    Hall, Simon J.
    Hall, Matt
    Herrera, Phapichaya Chaoprang
    Leventhal, Elaine A.
    Leventhal, Howard
    Diefenbach, Michael A.
    [J]. MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2015, 35 (04) : 477 - 486
  • [45] Oncological patients' decision making processes concerning their pain medication at home: a qualitative secondary analysis
    Luescher-Buffet, Claudine
    Koller, Antje
    Schaefer, Iris
    Spichiger, Elisabeth
    [J]. PFLEGE, 2012, 25 (05): : 353 - 362
  • [46] What Is Important When Making Treatment Decisions in Metastatic Breast Cancer? A Qualitative Analysis of Decision-Making in Patients and Oncologists
    Rocque, Gabrielle B.
    Rasool, Aysha
    Williams, Beverly R.
    Wallace, Audrey S.
    Niranjan, Soumya J.
    Halilova, Karina I.
    Turkman, Yasemin E.
    Ingram, Stacey A.
    Williams, Courtney P.
    Forero-Torres, Andres
    Smith, Tom
    Bhatia, Smita
    Knight, Sara J.
    [J]. ONCOLOGIST, 2019, 24 (10): : 1313 - 1321
  • [47] A Natural Experiment Of Shared Decision-making For Primary Prevention Implantable Cardioverter-defibrillators In Patients With Heart Failure
    Rao, Birju R.
    Dickert, Neal W.
    Abernethy, Eli
    Howard, David
    Matlock, Daniel D.
    Merchant, Faisal
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CARDIAC FAILURE, 2022, 28 (05) : S98 - S98
  • [48] Evaluation of decision-making capacity in patients with dementia: challenges and recommendations from a secondary analysis of qualitative interviews
    Christopher Poppe
    Bernice S. Elger
    Tenzin Wangmo
    Manuel Trachsel
    [J]. BMC Medical Ethics, 21
  • [49] Evaluation of decision-making capacity in patients with dementia: challenges and recommendations from a secondary analysis of qualitative interviews
    Poppe, Christopher
    Elger, Bernice S.
    Wangmo, Tenzin
    Trachsel, Manuel
    [J]. BMC MEDICAL ETHICS, 2020, 21 (01)
  • [50] 'I just thought it was normal aches and pains': a qualitative study of decision-making processes in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis
    Sheppard, J.
    Kumar, K.
    Buckley, C. D.
    Shaw, K. L.
    Raza, K.
    [J]. RHEUMATOLOGY, 2008, 47 (10) : 1577 - 1582