Decision-making Processes among Prostate Cancer Survivors with Rising PSA Levels: Results from a Qualitative Analysis

被引:19
|
作者
Shen, Megan Johnson [1 ]
Nelson, Christian J. [1 ]
Peters, Ellen [2 ]
Slovin, Susan F. [3 ]
Hall, Simon J. [4 ]
Hall, Matt [4 ]
Herrera, Phapichaya Chaoprang [4 ]
Leventhal, Elaine A. [5 ]
Leventhal, Howard [5 ]
Diefenbach, Michael A. [4 ]
机构
[1] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Psychiat & Behav Sci, New York, NY 10021 USA
[2] Ohio State Univ, Dept Psychol, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[3] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Med, New York, NY 10021 USA
[4] Mt Sinai, Dept Urol, New York, NY USA
[5] Univ Med & Dent New Jersey, Robert Wood Johnson Med Sch, Dept Med, New Brunswick, NJ 08903 USA
关键词
prostate cancer; decision making; survivorship; androgen deprivation therapy; rising prostate specific antigen; RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; DOUBLING TIME; PROGRESSION; RECURRENCE; ANTIGEN; COMMUNICATION; INVOLVEMENT; PREFERENCES; UNCERTAINTY; PATTERNS;
D O I
10.1177/0272989X14558424
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background. Prostate cancer survivors with a rising prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level have few treatment options, experience a heightened state of uncertainty about their disease trajectory that might include the possibility of cancer metastasis and death, and often experience elevated levels of distress as they have to deal with a disease they thought they had conquered. Guided by self-regulation theory, the present study examined the cognitive and affective processes involved in shared decision making between physicians and patients who experience a rising PSA after definitive treatment for prostate cancer. Methods. In-depth interviews were conducted with 34 prostate cancer survivors who had been diagnosed with a rising PSA (i.e., biochemical failure) within the past 12 months. Survivors were asked about their experiences and affective responses after being diagnosed with a rising PSA and while weighing potential treatment options. In addition, patients were asked about their decision-making process for the initial prostate cancer treatment. Results. Compared with the initial diagnosis, survivors with a rising PSA reported increased negative affect following their diagnosis, concern about the treatability of their disease, increased planning and health behavior change, heightened levels of worry preceding doctor appointments (especially prior to the discussion of PSA testing results), and a strong reliance on physicians' treatment recommendations. Conclusions. Prostate cancer survivors' decision-making processes for the treatment of a rising PSA are markedly different from those of the initial diagnosis of prostate cancer. Because patients experience heightened distress and rely more heavily on their physicians' recommendations with a rising PSA, interactions with the health care provider provide an excellent opportunity to address and assist patients with managing the uncertainty and distress inherent with rising PSA levels.
引用
收藏
页码:477 / 486
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] DECISION-MAKING PROCESSES FOR BREAST, COLORECTAL, AND PROSTATE CANCER SCREENING: RESULTS FROM THE DECISIONS STUDY
    Hoffman, Richard M.
    Lewis, Carmen
    Pignone, Michael
    Couper, Mick P.
    Barry, Michael J.
    Elmore, Joanne G.
    Levin, Carrie A.
    VanHoewyk, John
    Zikmund-Fisher, Brian J.
    [J]. ANNALS OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE, 2011, 41 : S151 - S151
  • [2] Dietary decision-making in Chinese breast cancer survivors: A qualitative study
    Tang, Julia Wei Chun
    Lam, Wendy Wing Tak
    Kwong, Ava
    Ma, Anson Shin Ying
    Fielding, Richard
    [J]. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2022, 105 (02) : 460 - 465
  • [3] Medicare Decision-making, Understanding, and Satisfaction Among Cancer Survivors
    Franklin, Elizabeth F.
    Nichols, Helen M.
    Bohannon, Linda
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CANCER EDUCATION, 2022, 37 (01) : 141 - 147
  • [4] Medicare Decision-making, Understanding, and Satisfaction Among Cancer Survivors
    Elizabeth F. Franklin
    Helen M. Nichols
    Linda Bohannon
    [J]. Journal of Cancer Education, 2022, 37 : 141 - 147
  • [5] Shared decision-making—Results from an interdisciplinary consulting service for prostate cancer
    M. Schostak
    T. Wiegel
    M. Müller
    S. Hoecht
    M. Schrader
    B. Straub
    D. Bottke
    W. Hinkelbein
    K. Miller
    [J]. World Journal of Urology, 2004, 22 : 441 - 448
  • [6] Shared decision-making -: Results from an interdisciplinary consulting service for prostate cancer
    Schostak, M
    Wiegel, T
    Müller, M
    Hoecht, S
    Schrader, M
    Straub, B
    Bottke, D
    Hinkelbein, W
    Miller, K
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2004, 22 (06) : 441 - 448
  • [7] The complicated 'Yes': Decision-making processes and receptivity to lung cancer screening among head and neck cancer survivors
    Seaman, Aaron T.
    Dukes, Kimberly
    Hoffman, Richard M.
    Christensen, Alan J.
    Kendell, Nicholas
    Sussman, Andrew L.
    Velez-Bermudez, Miriam
    Volk, Robert J.
    Pagedar, Nitin A.
    [J]. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2018, 101 (10) : 1741 - 1747
  • [8] Patient participation in treatment decision-making of prostate cancer: a qualitative study
    Shucheng Pan
    Jinjiao Mao
    Lijuan Wang
    Yun Dai
    Wei Wang
    [J]. Supportive Care in Cancer, 2022, 30 : 4189 - 4200
  • [9] Patient participation in treatment decision-making of prostate cancer: a qualitative study
    Pan, Shucheng
    Mao, Jinjiao
    Wang, Lijuan
    Dai, Yun
    Wang, Wei
    [J]. SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2022, 30 (05) : 4189 - 4200
  • [10] Decision-making processes among men with low-risk prostate cancer: A survey study
    Hoffman, Richard M.
    Van den Eeden, Stephen K.
    Davis, Kimberly M.
    Lobo, Tania
    Luta, George
    Shan, Jun
    Aaronson, David
    Penson, David F.
    Leimpeter, Amethyst D.
    Taylor, Kathryn L.
    [J]. PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY, 2018, 27 (01) : 325 - 332